Journals / FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 /

Balancing of Badiou’s ‘Two’: Taking into Account of ‘One’

BADİOU’DAKİ İKİ’Yİ DENGEYE OTURTMAK YA DA BİR’İN HESABA KATILIŞI

Pages
171–186
Publication Date
2013-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All the arguments in the article and the discourse on difference are aimed to be reasoned by a new representation, which allows for several ways of thinking and is shown by #

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study focuses on the concept of Two, which has a considerable place in the Badiouean philosophy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It aims to show that, in the case of One is not, Two is in an unbalanced situation and thus, Badiou has fallen into one-sidedness.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All the arguments in the article and the discourse on difference are aimed to be reasoned by a new representation, which allows for several ways of thinking and is shown by #
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Badiou · İki · Bir

Abstract

This study focuses on the concept of Two, which has a considerable place in the Badiouean philosophy. It aims to show that, in the case of One is not, Two is in an unbalanced situation and thus, Badiou has fallen into one-sidedness. It intends to prove that Two can come into balance only when One “is” ontology with One and this indicates a reverse ontology, the content of which is yet unknown. Furthermore, it aims to show that the position of One forms a new beginning, one that is different from the Badiouean beginning, which is founded in the void. All the arguments in the article and the discourse on difference are aimed to be reasoned by a new representation, which allows for several ways of thinking and is shown by #

Özet

Bu makalede, Badiou’nun felsefesinde önemli bir yer işgal eden İki kavramı üzerine odaklanılmıştır. Makale boyunca, İki’nin Bir’in olmadığı bir durumda dengesiz bir konumda olduğu ve böylece Badiou’nun tek yanlılığa düştüğü gösterilmek istenmiştir. İki’nin ancak Bir olduğunda Bir’li bir ontolojide dengeye gelebileceği ve bunun ise, henüz içeriği tam olarak bilinmeyen ters bir ontolojiyi işaret ettiği ispatlanmaya çalışılmıştır. Ayrıca, Bir’in konumunun, boşlukla temellenen Badioucu bir başlangıç noktasının varlığının yanı sıra, yeni ve ondan farklı başka bir başlangıç noktası daha oluşturduğu gösterilmeye çalışılmıştır. Makalede geçen bütün iddialar ve farka ilişkin ontolojik anlatım, birçok düşünme olanağını kendinde barındıran ve # ile gösterilen yeni bir gösterim ile temellendirilmeye çalışılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

DURSUN, Y. (2013). Balancing of Badiou’s ‘Two’: Taking into Account of ‘One’. FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 171–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/71132

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Dursun, Yücel. “Lacan‟ın Düşüncesindeki “Bir” Eksik Üzerine”, MonoKL, İstanbul, sayı: 6-7, 2009, 365-38.
  2. Badiou, Alain. Being and Event (Tr. Oliver Feltham), USA: Continuum, 2005.
  3. Badiou, Alain. “New Horizons in Mathematics as a Philosophical Condition: An Interview with Alain Badiou”, (Tr. Tzuchien Tho), Parrhesia, Number 3, 1-11. 2007a.
  4. Badiou, Alain. “Destruction, Negation, Subtraction” –on Pier Paolo Pasolini, Graduate Seminar - Art Center College of Design in Pasadena - February 6, 2007b
  5. Badiou, Alain. “The Three Negations”, Cardozo Law Review, Vol 29:5, 1877:1883, 2008.
  6. Badiou, Alain. Theory of the Subject (Tr. Bruno Bosteels), UK: Continuum, 2009.
  7. Clemens, Justin. “Doubles of Nothing: The Problem of Binding Truth to Being in the Work of Alain Badiou”, Filozosfki Vestnik, Volume XXVI, Number 2, 97-111, 2005.
  8. Hallward, Peter. A Subject to Truth, Minneapolis & London: University of Minneapolis Press, 2003.