Journals / FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 /

Saló: Political Apparatus of Torture

SALÓ: POLİTİK BİR AYGIT OLARAK İŞKENCE

Pages
17–30
Publication Date
2016-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At issue here is a kind of torture that is political, a constitutive act of state terror, which aims to decrease the body’s revolting capacity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Focusing on Pier Paolo Pasolini’s final film, Saló, this article discusses torture as an apparatus of domination, as the most privileged actualisation of state terror.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Based on Agamben’s conceptualisation of the state of exception, it argues that, on the one hand sovereign political power turns the state of exception into the rule; on the other it aims to justify repressive apparatuses such as torture.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At issue here is a kind of torture that is political, a constitutive act of state terror, which aims to decrease the body’s revolting capacity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Egemenlik · işkence · istisna hâli

Abstract

Focusing on Pier Paolo Pasolini’s final film, Saló, this article discusses torture as an apparatus of domination, as the most privileged actualisation of state terror. Based on Agamben’s conceptualisation of the state of exception, it argues that, on the one hand sovereign political power turns the state of exception into the rule; on the other it aims to justify repressive apparatuses such as torture. In this sense sovereignty is not only about states of exception. The article therefore discusses torture and the state of exception as inseparable elements of the ‘liberal way of war’. Torture reveals the nature of sovereignty and its rational consciousness. At issue here is a kind of torture that is political, a constitutive act of state terror, which aims to decrease the body’s revolting capacity.

Özet

Bu makale Pier Paolo Pasolini’nin son filmi Saló’ya odaklanarak, işkenceyi egemenliğin bir tahakküm aygıtı, devlet terörünün en ‘ayrıcalıklı’ politik biçimlerinden biri olarak kuramlaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Agambenci bir şemayı kullanan makale, egemenliğin bir taraftan istisna hâlini kurala dönüştürürken, diğer taraftan işkence gibi baskı ve kontrol tekniklerini de meşrulaştırmaya çalıştığını iddia etmektedir. Dolayısıyla, egemenlik sadece istisna hâliyle sınırlı değildir. Makale, bu bakımdan, işkence ve istisna hâlini ‘liberal savaş biçimi’nin ayrılmaz parçaları olarak tartışacaktır. İşkence hem egemenliğin doğasını hem de rasyonel bilincini tüm çıplaklığıyla açığa vurur. Burada söz konusu olan politik bir işkencedir, çünkü işkence bedenin oluş ve direniş potansiyelini azaltan kurucu bir devlet terörü edimidir

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞKALE, A. R. (2016). Saló: Political Apparatus of Torture. FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/71033

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Agamben G, Homo Sacer. Sovereign Power and Bare Life, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1998
  2. Agamben Giorgio, State of Exception, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2005
  3. Bigo D ve A Tsoukala, Terror, Insecurity and Liberty: Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regimes after 9/11, London, Routledge, 2008
  4. Brenner N, New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004 Brighenti AM, “On Territorology: Towards a General Science of Territory” Theory, Culture & Society, 27(1), 2010, ss. 52-72.
  5. Butler J, Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, Verso, London, 2004
  6. Chiesa, L, “Pasolini and the Ugliness of Bodies”, In corpore: bodies in postunification Italy içinde, Eds L Polezzi ve C Ross, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, Madison and. Teaneck, 2007, ss. 208-226.
  7. Dershowitz A, Why terrorism works: understanding the threat, responding to the challenge, Yale University Press, New Haven, 2002
  8. Diken B, Revolt, Revolution, Critique: The Paradox of Society, London, Routledge, 2012 Dillon M & Reid J, The Liberal Way of War: Killing to Make Life Live, Routledge, London and New York, 2009
  9. Elden S, Terror and Territory: The Spatial Extent of Sovereignty, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2009
  10. Evans B, Liberal Terror, Cambridge, Polity, 2013
  11. Evans, B & Reid, J, Resilient Life: The Art of Living Dangerously, Cambridge, Polity, 2014
  12. Graham, S, Cities Under Siege: The New Military Urbanism, London, Verso, 2010 Gregory D, “The Black Flag: Guantanamo Bay and the Space of Exception” Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography, 88(4), 2006, ss. 405- 427. Hardt M & Negri A, Empire, Harvard University Press,
  13. Cambridge, Mass., 2000 Human Rights Watch, “Torture and Mistreatment in Pre-Trial Detention by Anti-Terror Police”, 1 Mart, 1997 http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/publisher,HRW,,TUR,3ae6a7dd4,0.ht ml (14.08.2015) Jones J, “The Pasolini code” G2, 24 Kasım, 2005 http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2005/nov/24/2 (14.08.2015) Kelly T, “The Cause of Human Rights: Doubts about Torture, Law and Ethics at the United Nations”, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17(4), 2011, ss. 728-744. Kelly T, “The UN Committee Against Torture: Human Rights Monitoring and the Legal Recognition of Torture”, Human Rights Quarterly 31(3), 2009, ss. 777-800.
  14. Langbein JH, Torture and the Law of Proof: Europe and England in the Ancien Regime, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2006 Luban D, “Liberalism, Torture, and the T