SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2017 / 22. UPK Ahmet Hamdi İSLAMOĞLU Özel Sayısı

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TIME ORIENTATION AND CONSUMER INNOVATIVENESS: THE CASE OF TURKEY AND IRAN

ZAMAN ORYANTASYONU İLE TÜKETİCİ YENİLİKÇİLİĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: TÜRKİYE VE İRAN ÖRNEĞİ

Tevfik Şükrü YAPRAKLI
Ali ABSALAN
Musa ÜNALAN
Pages
209–222
Publication Date
2017-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results suggest that future and past orientation were negatively related to consumers’ innovativeness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between consumers’ time orientation (future, present, and past) and consumer innovativeness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample comprised of 541 participants from Turkey (n=229) and Iran (n=312).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results suggest that future and past orientation were negatively related to consumers’ innovativeness.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tüketici Yenilikçiliği · Zaman Oryantasyonu · Türkiye

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between consumers’ time orientation (future, present, and past) and consumer innovativeness. Time orientation is a general orientation towards the present or the future. Consumer innovation is a personal profile which reflects tendency towards change. The sample comprised of 541 participants from Turkey (n=229) and Iran (n=312). The results suggest that future and past orientation were negatively related to consumers’ innovativeness. The findings also indicate that in terms of present orientation, past orientation and consumer innovativeness, there is a significant difference among the countries. Moreover, the degrees of future orientation in Iran participants higher than Turkish participants while the degrees of past orientation, present orientation and consumer innovativeness in Turkish respondents higher than Iran. The research results can contribute to the marketing professionals for understanding consumer behaviors.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı tüketicilerin zaman oryantasyonu (geçmiş, şimdiki, gelecek) ile tüketici yenililikçiliği arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Zaman oryantasyonu, geçmiş, bugün ve geleceğe yönelik genel bir yönelimdir. Tüketici yenilikçiliği, değişime yönelik eğilimi yansıtan kişisel bir profildir. Türkiye (n=229) ve İran (n=312) ‘dan toplamda 541 katılımcı çalışmanın örneklemini oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre, tüketicilerin geçmiş ve gelecek oryantasyonu ile tüketici yenilikçiliği arasında negatif bir ilişki olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Ayrıca, iki ülke arasında geçmiş oryantasyon, şimdiki oryantasyon ve tüketici yenilikçiliği değişkenleri açısından aralarında anlamlı bir farklılık olduğu görülmüştür. Bununla birlikte, İranlı katılımcıların gelecek oryantasyonları Türk katılımcılarından yüksek iken; Türk katılımcıların geçmiş oryantasyon, şimdiki oryantasyon ve tüketici yenilikçiliği değişkenleri bakımından algı düzeyleri daha yüksek çıkmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarının, pazarlama yöneticilerinin tüketici davranışlarını anlamalarına katkıda bulunması beklenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAPRAKLI, T. Ş., ABSALAN, A., ÜNALAN, M. (2017). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TIME ORIENTATION AND CONSUMER INNOVATIVENESS: THE CASE OF TURKEY AND IRAN. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 22. UPK Ahmet Hamdi İSLAMOĞLU Özel Sayısı, 209–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/709287

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aaker. D. A., and Keller, KL. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extension. Journal of Marketing, 54, 27-41.
  2. Ali Abu-Rahma, Bushra Jaleel, (2017) "Influence of managers’ time orientation on strategic practices in the UAE: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty", International Journal of Emerging Markets, Vol. 12 Issue: 2, pp.219-237, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-01-2015-0011 Altaf Merchant, and K. Sivakumar (2011), “Erratum to: Relationships Among Time Orientation, Consumer Innovativeness, and Innovative Behavior: The Moderating Role of Product Characteristics,” Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1 (2), 99–116.
  3. Amirshahi, M., Yazdani, H. R., & Aulipour, E. (2014). Investigation of Green Marketing Tools' Effect on Consumers' Behavior among Members of Social Networks in Iran. New Marketing Research Journal, 3(4). Beek, J., Handgraaf, M. J., & Antonides, G. (2017). Time orientation and construal level: effects on eating and exercising behaviour and preferences. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(1), 54-60.
  4. Cowart, K O, Fox G L & Wilson A E 2008, "A Structural Look at Consumer Innovativeness and Self-Congruence in New Product Purchases", Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 25, No. 12, pp.1111-1130.
  5. Foxall, G., R., and Goldsmith R. E. (2003). The measurment of innovativeness, in L V Shavinina. The International Handbook on Innovation, Elsevier Science Ltd, pp.321-328.
  6. Graham, Robert J.(1981),‘‘The Role of Perception of Time in Consumer Research,’’ Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (March), 335-42.
  7. Green, E. G., Deschamps, J. C., & Páez, D. (2005). Variation of individualism and collectivism within and between 20 countries a typological analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 321–339. doi:10.1177/0022022104273654 Harber, Kent D., Phillip G. Zimbardo, and John N. Boyd (2003), “Participant Self-Selection Biases as a Function of Individual Differences in Time Perspective,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25 (3), 255–264.
  8. Hart, D. N. (1997). Dendritic cells: unique leukocyte populations which control the primary immune response. Blood, 90(9), 3245-3287.
  9. Hauser, J., Tellis, G. J., and Griffin, A. (2006). Research on innovation: a review and agenda for marketing science. Journal of Marketing science, 25, 687–717.
  10. Heidenreich, S., and Spieth, P. (2013). Why innovations fail the case of passive and active innovation resistance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(5), 1–42.
  11. Hirschman, E. C. (1980). Innovativeness, novelty