SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2019 / Sayı: 24

THE MODERATING EFFECT OF POWER DISTANCE ON ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE AND ORGANİZATIONAL CYNICISM

ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET İLE ÖRGÜTSEL SİNİZM ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE GÜÇ MESAFESİNİN DÜZENLEYİCİ ETKİSİ

Ali ACARAY
Pages
197–214
Publication Date
2019-07-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Research results covered up that distributive justice had a negative effect on affective and behavioral cynicism; interactional justice had a negative effect on cognitive and affective cynicism; power distance had a moderator effect on the relationship between distributive justice and behavioral cynicism and interactional justice and behavioral cynicism; procedural justice had a moderator effect on the relationship between distributive justice and cognitive cynicism and interactional justice and cognitive cynicism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Employees develop various attitudes against to policies and practices of their organizations in their working lives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To accomplish this aim, the data were collected from 255 employees working at different organizations in the banking sector.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Research results covered up that distributive justice had a negative effect on affective and behavioral cynicism; interactional justice had a negative effect on cognitive and affective cynicism; power distance had a moderator effect on the relationship between distributive justice and behavioral cynicism and interactional justice and behavioral cynicism; procedural justice had a moderator effect on the relationship between distributive justice and cognitive cynicism and interactional justice and cognitive cynicism.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Örgütsel Adalet · Prosedürel Adalet · Örgütsel Sinizm

Abstract

Employees develop various attitudes against to policies and practices of their organizations in their working lives. As one of these attitudes organizational cynicism can arise out of unjust, unhonest, untruth, insincere and inconsistent policies, principles and practices in organizations. The main purpose of current study is to examine the relationship between organizational justice and organizational cynicism and the moderating effect of power distance on this relationship. To accomplish this aim, the data were collected from 255 employees working at different organizations in the banking sector. Data were collected through a questionnaire. The hypotheses were tested with structural equation model. Research results covered up that distributive justice had a negative effect on affective and behavioral cynicism; interactional justice had a negative effect on cognitive and affective cynicism; power distance had a moderator effect on the relationship between distributive justice and behavioral cynicism and interactional justice and behavioral cynicism; procedural justice had a moderator effect on the relationship between distributive justice and cognitive cynicism and interactional justice and cognitive cynicism.

Özet

İşgörenler çalışma yaşamlarında, kurumlarının politika ve uygulamalarına karşılık olarak çeşitli iş tutumları geliştirmektedirler. Bu tutumlardan biri olan örgütsel sinizm de, kurumlardaki adil, dürüst, doğru ve samimi olmayan, tutarsız politika, ilke ve uygulamaların varlığında ortaya çıkabilmektedir. Yapılan çalışmanın temel amacı, çalışanların örgütsel adalet algılamaları ile örgütsel sinizm tutumları arasındaki ilişkinin ve bu ilişkide güç mesafesinin düzenleyici etkisinin incelenmesidir. Bu amacı gerçekleştirmek için veriler bankacılık sektöründeki çeşitli kurumların 255 işgöreninden anket soru formu ile toplanmıştır. Değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçları; dağıtımsal adaletinin duyuşsal ve davranışsal sinizmi, etkileşim adaletinin bilişsel ve duyuşsal sinizmi negatif etkilediğini; güç mesafesinin dağıtımsal adalet ile davranışsal sinizm ve etkileşim adaleti ile davranışsal sinizm arasındaki ilişkide düzenleyici bir etkiye; prosedürel adaletinin dağıtımsal adalet ile bilişsel sinizm ve etkileşim adaleti ile bilişsel sinizm arasındaki ilişkide düzenleyici bir etkiye sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACARAY, A. (2019). THE MODERATING EFFECT OF POWER DISTANCE ON ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE AND ORGANİZATIONAL CYNICISM. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Sayı: 24, 197–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/709241

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abraham, R. (2000). Organizational Cynicism: Bases and Consequences. Generic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126(3), 269-292.
  2. Acaray, A. ve Şevik, N. (2016). Kültürel Boyutların Örgütsel Sessizliğe Etkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Hacettepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 34(4), 1-18.
  3. Acaray, A. ve Yıldırım, S. (2017). The Impact of Personality Traits on Organizational Cynicism in the Education Sector. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 13(1), 65-76.
  4. Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an Understanding of Inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
  5. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. (Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Ed.: Berkowitz, L.), New York: Academic Press, 267-299.
  6. Akyol, Ş. (2009). Örgüt Kültüründe Güç Mesafesi ve Liderlik İlişkisi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi SBE, İstanbul.
  7. Ambrose, M., Hess, R. L. ve Ganesan, S. (2007). The Relationship between Justice and Attitudes: An Examination of Justice Effects on Event and System-related Attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decionis Processes, 103(1), 21-36.
  8. Andersson, L. M. (1996). Employee Cynicism: An Examination Using A Contract Violation Framework. Human Relations, 49(11), 1395-1418.
  9. Andersson, L. M. ve Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the Workplace: Some Causes and Effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 449-469.
  10. Arabacı, B. (2010). The Effects of Depersonalization and Organizational Cynicism Levels on the Job Satisfaction of Educational Inspectors. African Journal of Business Management, 4(13), 2802-2811.
  11. Asgari, A., Silong, A.D., Ahmad, A. ve Samah, B. A. (2008). The Relationship between Organizational Characteristics, Task Characteristics, Cultural Context and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 13, 94-107.
  12. Bedeian, A. G. (2007). Even if the Tower Is “Ivory,” It Isn’t “White:” Understanding the Consequences of Faculty Cynicism. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(1), 9-32.Ertürk, E. (2014). Sosyal Mübadele Teorisi Bağlamında Güç Mesafesi ve Örgütsel Adalet Algılamalarının Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Selçuk Üniversitesi SBE, Konya. Bernerth, J. B., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S. ve Walker, H. J. (2007).
  13. Justice, Cynicism, and Commitment: A Study of Important Organizational Change Variables. Journal of Applied Beh