Journals / Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

The Evaluation of Physical Space Quality in Education Buildings in Regard to User Satisfaction

EĞİTİM YAPILARINDA FİZİKSEL ÇEVRE KALİTESİNİN KULLANICI MEMNUNİYETİ AÇISINDAN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Pages
25–42
Publication Date
2016-08-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study is first to understand which criteria are important for the students and then to improve the physical space quality in regard to the dissatisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, physical space quality of two different engineering department buildings in Uludag University Gorukle Campus, Bursa, Turkey are analyzed in regard to user evaluations about the physical space quality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the analysis of these evaluations, criteria about physical space quality are predetermined by the authors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study is first to understand which criteria are important for the students and then to improve the physical space quality in regard to the dissatisfaction.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Eğitim Binası · Kullanım Sürecinde Değerlendirme · Fiziksel Çevre Kontrolü

Abstract

In this study, physical space quality of two different engineering department buildings in Uludag University Gorukle Campus, Bursa, Turkey are analyzed in regard to user evaluations about the physical space quality. In the analysis of these evaluations, criteria about physical space quality are predetermined by the authors. In the method of the study, the below phases are implemented. In first, the literature review about the physical space quality is done and then a questionnaire is prepared with regard to the key themes in literature review in order to evaluate the user satisfaction. The key themes in user satisfaction questionnaire is accessibility, ergonomics, thermal comfort, audible comfort, visual comfort, inner space air quality, service spaces, socialization. The aim of this study is first to understand which criteria are important for the students and then to improve the physical space quality in regard to the dissatisfaction.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Uludag Üniversitesi Gorukle Yerleşkesi’nde yer alan 2 ayrı mühendislik bölümüne ait binalardaki iç mekân fiziksel çevre kalitesi kullanıcı görüşleri alınarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bu değerlendirmenin yapılabilmesi için fiziksel çevre kalitesini oluşturan unsurlar çalışma yazarları tarafından belirlenmiştir. Çalışmanın yöntemi aşağıdaki aşamalarda gerçekleşmiştir: ilk aşamada fiziksel çevre kalitesine ile ilgili literatür analizi yapılmıştır. Literatür analizinde öne çıkan anahtar kavramlardan yola çıkarak bu kavramların sorgulanmasına ilişkin kullanıcı görüşlerini almaya yönelik olarak anket hazırlanmıştır. Literatür analizi sonrasında ortaya konulan anahtar kavramlar Ulaşılabilirlik, Erişilebilirlik, Ergonomi, Isıl Konfor, İşitsel Konfor, Görsel Konfor, İç Hava Kalitesi, Hizmet Mekânları, Sosyalleşmedir. Bu değerlendirmenin amacı, mekân kullanımında öğrenciler için önemli olan kriterleri tespit etmek ve binanın ihtiyaç duyulan performans koşullarını yerine getirmesine olanak sağlamaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZER, F. Ş., ARSLAN, T. V. (2016). The Evaluation of Physical Space Quality in Education Buildings in Regard to User Satisfaction. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 25–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/708793

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Agraa, O. M. and Whitehead, B. (1968) A study of movement in a school building, Building Science, 2(4), 279-289. doi: 10.1016/007-3628(68)90008-X Arena, A. P. and De Rosa, C. (2003) Life cycle assessment of energy and environmental implications of the implementation of conservation technologies in school buildings in Mendoza-Argentina: Arena, Building and Environment, 38(2), 359–368. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0360-1323(02)00056-2
  2. Avsar, Y.and Gonullu, M. T. (2005) Determination of safe distance between roadway and school buildings to get acceptable school outdoor noise level by using noise barriers, Building and Environment, 40(9), 1255-1260. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv. 2004.10.020 Baker, N. (1982) The influence of thermal comfort and user control on the design of a passive solar school building-Locksheath primary school, Energy and Buildings, 5(2), 135-145. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-7788(82)90009-3
  3. Becker, R. and Goldberger, I. and Paciuk, M. (2007) Improving energy performance of school buildings while ensuring indoor air quality ventilation, Building and Environment, 42(9), 3261-3276. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.08.016
  4. Boneh, M. (1982) Environmental comfort in educational buildings — Influence of windows and other openings, Energy and Buildings, 4(3), 239-243. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-7788(82)90053-6
  5. Butala, V. and Novak, P. (1999) Energy consumption and potential energy savings in old school buildings, Energy and Buildings, 29(3), 241-246. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(98)00062-0
  6. Carter, D. J. (1984) The lighting of the St. Mary's School, Wallasey, Building and Environment, 19(4), 209-215. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(84)90001-5
  7. Chan, F. (2001) Public school, public building: The role of the school in building the city, Cities, 18(3), 193-197. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00011-7
  8. Clay, F. (1903)
  9. The ventilation of school buildings, The Lancet, 161, 760 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)85035-2
  10. Clements-Croome, D.J. and Awbi, H.B. and Bakó-Biró, Zs and Kochhar, N. and Williams, M. (2008)
  11. Ventilation rates in schools, Building and Environment, 43(3), 362-367. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.03.018
  12. Graça, V. A. C. and Kowaltowski, D. C. C. K. and Petrache, J. R. D. (2007) An evaluation method for school building design at the preliminary phase with optimisation of aspects of environmental comfort for the school system of the State São Paulo in Bra