Journals / Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Eğitim Yapılarında Fiziksel Çevre Kalitesinin Kullanıcı Memnuniyeti Açısından Değerlendirilmesi

THE EVALUATION OF PHYSICAL SPACE QUALITY IN EDUCATION BUILDINGS IN REGARD TO USER SATISFACTION

Pages
25–41
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study is first to understand which criteria are important for the students and then to improve the physical space quality in regard to the dissatisfaction

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, physical space quality of two different engineering department buildings in Uludag University Gorukle Campus, Bursa, Turkey are analyzed in regard to user evaluations about the physical space quality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the analysis of these evaluations, criteria about physical space quality are predetermined by the authors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study is first to understand which criteria are important for the students and then to improve the physical space quality in regard to the dissatisfaction
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, physical space quality of two different engineering department buildings in Uludag University Gorukle Campus, Bursa, Turkey are analyzed in regard to user evaluations about the physical space quality. In the analysis of these evaluations, criteria about physical space quality are predetermined by the authors. In the method of the study, the below phases are implemented. In first, the literature review about the physical space quality is done and then a questionnaire is prepared with regard to the key themes in literature review in order to evaluate the user satisfaction. The key themes in user satisfaction questionnaire is accessibility, ergonomics, thermal comfort, audible comfort, visual comfort, inner space air quality, service spaces, socialization. The aim of this study is first to understand which criteria are important for the students and then to improve the physical space quality in regard to the dissatisfaction

Özet

Bu çalışmada Uludag Üniversitesi Gorukle Yerleşkesi'nde yer alan 2 ayrı mühendislik bölümüne ait binalardaki iç mekân fiziksel çevre kalitesi kullanıcı görüşleri alınarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bu değerlendirmenin yapılabilmesi için fiziksel çevre kalitesini oluşturan unsurlar çalışma yazarları tarafından belirlenmiştir. Çalışmanın yöntemi aşağıdaki aşamalarda gerçekleşmiştir: ilk aşamada fiziksel çevre kalitesine ile ilgili literatür analizi yapılmıştır. Literatür analizinde öne çıkan anahtar kavramlardan yola çıkarak bu kavramların sorgulanmasına ilişkin kullanıcı görüşlerini almaya yönelik olarak anket hazırlanmıştır. Literatür analizi sonrasında ortaya konulan anahtar kavramlar Ulaşılabilirlik, Erişilebilirlik, Ergonomi, Isıl Konfor, İşitsel Konfor, Görsel Konfor, İç Hava Kalitesi, Hizmet Mekânları, Sosyalleşmedir. Bu değerlendirmenin amacı, mekân kullanımında öğrenciler için önemli olan kriterleri tespit etmek ve binanın ihtiyaç duyulan performans koşullarını yerine getirmesine olanak sağlamaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZER, F. Ş., ARSLAN, T. V. (2016). Eğitim Yapılarında Fiziksel Çevre Kalitesinin Kullanıcı Memnuniyeti Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 25–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/330162

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Agraa, O. M. and Whitehead, B. (1968)A study of movement in a school building,Building Science,2(4), 279-289.doi: 10.1016/007-3628(68)90008-X 2.Arena, A. P. and De Rosa, C. (2003)Life cycle assessment of energy and environmental implications of the implementation of conservation technologies in schoolbuildings in Mendoza-Argentina: Arena, Building and Environment, 38(2),359-368.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(02)00056-2 3.Avsar, Y.and Gonullu, M. T. (2005) Determination of safe distance between roadway and school buildings to get acceptable school outdoor noise level by using noise barriers, Building and Environment,40(9), 1255-1260.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.10.020 4.Baker, N.(1982)The influence of thermal comfort and user control on the design of a passive solar school building-Locksheath primary school, Energy and Buildings,5(2),135-145.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-7788(82)90009-3 5.Becker, R.andGoldberger, I.andPaciuk, M. (2007)Improving energy performance of school buildings while ensuring indoor air quality ventilation, Building and Environment,42(9),3261-3276.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.08.016 6.Boneh, M. (1982)Environmental comfort in educational buildings --Influence of windows and other openings, Energy and Buildings,4(3), 239-243.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-7788(82)90053-6 7.Butala, V.andNovak, P. (1999)Energy consumption and potential energy savings in old school buildings, Energy and Buildings,29(3),241-246.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(98)00062-0 8.Carter, D. J. (1984)The lighting of the St. Mary's School, Wallasey, Building and Environment,19(4),209-215.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(84)90001-5 9.Chan, F. (2001)Public school, public building: The role of the school in building the city, Cities,18(3),193-197.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00011-7 10.Clay, F. (1903)The ventilation of school buildings, The Lancet,161, 760doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)85035-2 11.Clements-Croome, D.J. andAwbi, H.B. andBakó-Biró, Zs andKochhar, N. andWilliams, M. (2008)Ventilation rates in schools, Building and Environment,43(3),362-367.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.03.018 12.Graça, V. A.C. andKowaltowski, D.C.C.K.andPetrache, J.R. D. (2007)An evaluation method for school building design at the preliminary phase with optimisation of aspects of environmental comfort for the school system of the State São Paulo in Brazil, Building and Environment,42(2),9