Journals / Endüstri Mühendisliği / 2017 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

CLOSED LOOP SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORK DESIGN PROBLEM

KAPALI DÖNGÜ TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ AĞI TASARIMI

Pages
2–18
Publication Date
2017-11-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the tactical level, the model decides on the amount of products that are obtained either from manufacturing or recovery to send to customers in the forward direction, the amount of used products to send from the customers to the recovery facilities in the reverse direction, and the total amount of products to be processed in production and recovery facilities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we address the closed loop supply chain network design problem, which integrates reverse flows and reverse supply chain activities into the traditional forward supply chain activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This network design problem requires strategic and tactical level decisions to be taken into account simultaneously.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the tactical level, the model decides on the amount of products that are obtained either from manufacturing or recovery to send to customers in the forward direction, the amount of used products to send from the customers to the recovery facilities in the reverse direction, and the total amount of products to be processed in production and recovery facilities.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kapalı döngü tedarik zinciri · tersine lojistik · Closed loop supply chain

Abstract

In this study, we address the closed loop supply chain network design problem, which integrates reverse flows and reverse supply chain activities into the traditional forward supply chain activities. This network design problem requires strategic and tactical level decisions to be taken into account simultaneously. Within this context, a multiproduct and capacitated mixed integer linear programming model is developed. At the strategic level, the model decides where to open production and recovery facilities and which existing facilities to close. At the tactical level, the model decides on the amount of products that are obtained either from manufacturing or recovery to send to customers in the forward direction, the amount of used products to send from the customers to the recovery facilities in the reverse direction, and the total amount of products to be processed in production and recovery facilities.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, ileri yöndeki geleneksel tedarik zinciri faaliyetlerine ek olarak tersine akış ve tersine tedarik zinciri faaliyetlerini de içinde barındıran kapalı döngü tedarik zinciri ağı tasarımı problemi ele alınmaktadır. Stratejik ve taktik seviyedeki kararların birlikte verilmesini gerektiren bu tasarım problemi kapsamında çok ürünlü, kapasiteli, karma bir tamsayılı doğrusal programlama modeli geliştirilmiştir. Stratejik seviyede, üretim ve geri kazanım tesislerinin nerelere açılacağına ve hâlihazırda açık olan tesislerden hangilerinin kapatılacağına karar verilmektedir. Taktik seviyede ise üretim tesislerinde elde edilen yeni ürünlerle geri kazanım tesislerinde elde edilen yenilenmiş ürünlerin müşterilere doğru ileri yöndeki akış miktarları ile kullanılmış ürünlerin müşterilerden geri kazanım tesislerine doğru tersine yöndeki akış miktarlarına ve üretim ile geri kazanım tesislerinde işlenmesi gereken toplam ürün miktarlarına karar verilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, A., ALEV, S. A. (2017). CLOSED LOOP SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORK DESIGN PROBLEM. Endüstri Mühendisliği, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 2–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/70693

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. TC AB Bakanlığı. 2014. “Avrupa Birliği’nin Çevre Politikası,” http://www.ab.gov.tr/index.php?p=92&l=1, son erişim tarihi: 03.06.2014
  2. Amin, S. H., Zhang, G. 2013.“A Multi-Objective Facility Location Model for Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Under Uncertain Demand and Return,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 37, p. 4165–4176
  3. Akcalı, E., Çetinkaya, S., Üster, H. 2009.“Network Design for Reverse and Closed-Loop Supply Chains: An Annotated Bibliography of Models and Solution Approaches,” Networks, vol. 53 (3), p. 231-248
  4. Alumur, S. A., Kara, B. Y., Melo, T. 2015. Location and Logistics,Editor: Laporte, G., Nickel, S., Saldanha-da-Gama, F., ISBN-13: 978-3-319-13110-8, Springer, Berlin
  5. Araújo, M. G., Magrini, A., Mahler, C. F., Bilitewski, B. 2012. “A Model for Estimation of Potential Generation of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment in Brazil,” Waste Management, vol. 32(2), p. 335-342
  6. European Commission. 2014. “Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment,” http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/weee/legis_en.htm, son erişim tarihi: 03.06.2014
  7. Eur-Lex. 2011. “End-of-Life Vehicles,” http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/environment/waste_management/l21225_en.ht, sonerişim tarihi: 26.09.2011
  8. Beamon, B. M., Fernandes, C. 2004. “Supply-Chain Network Configuration for Product Recovery,” Production Planning & Control, vol. 15 (3), p. 270–281
  9. Demirel, N., Gökçen, H. 2008. “A Mixed Integer Programming Model for Remanufacturing in Reverse Logistics Environment,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, vol. 39, p. 1197–1206
  10. Easwaran, G., Uster, H. 2010. “A Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Design Problem with Integrated Forward and Reverse Channel Decisions,” IIE Transactions, vol. 42, p. 779–792
  11. Fahimniaa, B., Sarkis, J., Dehghanianc, F., Banihashemi, N., Rahman, S. 2013. “The Impact of Carbon Pricing on a Closed-Loop Supply Chain: An Australian Case Study,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 59, p. 210-225
  12. Fleischmann, M., Beullens, P., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., Wassenhove, L. 2001. “The Impact of Product Recovery on Logistics Network Design,” Production Operations Management, vol. 10, p. 156–173
  13. Guide, V., Harrison, T.P., Wassenhove, L. 2003.“The Challenge of Closed-Loop Supply Chains,” Interfaces, vol. 33, p. 3–6
  14. Jayaraman, V., Guide, V., Srivastav, R. 1999.“A Closed-Loop Logistics Model for Remanufacturing,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 50, p. 497-508. 15.