Journals / Endüstri Mühendisliği / 2017 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

PARALLEL PRODUCTION LINES WITH SEQUENCE-DEPENDENT SETUP TIMES AND SIDE CONSTRAINTS

DİZİYE BAĞLI KURULUM SÜRELERİ VE YAN KISITLARI OLAN PARALEL ÜRETİM HATLARI

Pages
7–22
Publication Date
2018-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of our extensive runs have revealed the satisfactory performance of our heuristic procedures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We consider a scheduling problem observed in a soft-drink production facility with multiple production lines and sequence-dependent setup times.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The primary objective is to obtain a weekly schedule that minimizes the total weighted unsatisfied demand.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of our extensive runs have revealed the satisfactory performance of our heuristic procedures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çizelgeleme · dizi bağımlı kurulum zamanları · sezgisel

Abstract

We consider a scheduling problem observed in a soft-drink production facility with multiple production lines and sequence-dependent setup times. The primary objective is to obtain a weekly schedule that minimizes the total weighted unsatisfied demand. As a secondary objective we aim to minimize the total production and setup times. The number of molds and the number of shifts at any day are limited. We formulate the problem as a Mixed Integer Linear Program and propose several heuristic procedures for its solution. The results of our extensive runs have revealed the satisfactory performance of our heuristic procedures.

Özet

Çoklu üretim hatları ve diziye bağlı kurulum süreleri ile bir meşrubat üretim tesisinde gözlemlenen bir çizelgeleme problemini ele alıyoruz. Birincil hedefimiz, toplam ağırlıklı karşılanamayan talebi en aza indirecek haftalık bir program elde etmektir. İkinci bir hedef olarak, toplam üretim ve kurulum sürelerini en aza indirmeyi hedefliyoruz. Herhangi birgün de kalıp sayısı ve vardiya sayısı sınırlıdır. Problemi bir Karma Tamsayılı Doğrusal Program olarak formüle edip, çözüm için birkaç sezgisel prosedür önermekteyiz. Kapsamlı çalışmalarımızın sonucu, sezgisel prosedürlerimizin tatmin edici performansını ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARGUT, F. Z., AZİZOĞLU, M. (2018). PARALLEL PRODUCTION LINES WITH SEQUENCE-DEPENDENT SETUP TIMES AND SIDE CONSTRAINTS. Endüstri Mühendisliği, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 7–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/70690

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Allahverdi, A. 2015. “The Third Comprehensive Survey on Scheduling Problems with Setup Times/Costs,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 246 (2), p. 345-378
  2. Araujo, S. A., Clark, A. 2013. “A priori Reformulations for Joint Rolling-Horizon Scheduling of Materials Processing and lot-Sizing Problem,” Computers Industrial Engineering, vol. 65 (4), p. 577-585
  3. Baldo, T. A., Santos, M. O., Almada-Lobo, B., Morabito, R. (2014). “An Optimization Approach for the Lot Sizing and Scheduling Problem in the Brewery Industry,” Computers Industrial Engineering, vol. 72, p. 58-71
  4. Boudhar, M., Haned, A. 2009. “Preemptive Scheduling in the Presence of Transportation Times,” Computers Operations Research, vol. 36 (8), p. 2387-2393
  5. Chen, J. F., Wu, T. H. 2006. Total Tardiness Minimization on Unrelated Parallel Machine Scheduling with Auxiliary Equipment Constraints,” Omega, vol. 34 (1), p. 81-89
  6. Clark, A., Mahdieh, M., Rangel, S. 2014. “Production Lot Sizing and Scheduling with Non-Triangular Sequence-Dependent Setup Times,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 52 (8), p. 2490-2503
  7. Dhaenens-Flipo, C. 2001. “A Bicriterion Approach to deal with a Constrained Single Objective Problem,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 74 (1), p. 93-101
  8. Drexl, A., Kimms, A. 1997. “Lot Sizing and Scheduling Survey and Extensions,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 99 (2), p. 221-235
  9. Ferreira, D., Morabito, R., Rangel, S. 2009. “Solution Approaches for the Soft Drink Integrated Production Lot Sizing and Scheduling Problem,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 196 (2), p. 697-706
  10. Ferreira, D., Morabito, R., Rangel, S. 2010. “Relax and Fix Heuristics to Solve One-Stage One-Machine Lot-Scheduling Models for Small-Scale Soft Drink Plants,” Computers Operations Research, vol. 37 (4), p. 684-691
  11. Ferreira, D., Clark, A. R., Almada-Lobo, B., Morabito, R. 2012. “Single-Stage Formulations for Synchronized Two-Stage Lot Sizing and Scheduling in Soft Drink Production,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 136 (2), p. 255-265
  12. Freeman, N. K., Mittenthal, J., Melouk, S. H. 2014. “Parallel-Machine Scheduling to Minimize Overtime and Waste Costs,” IIE Transactions, vol. 46 (6), p. 601-618
  13. Gicquel, C., Minoux, M. (2015). “Multi-Product Valid Inequalities for the Discrete Lot Sizing and Scheduling Problem,” Computers Operations Research, vol. 54, p. 12-20
  14. Kaya, C., Sarac, T. 20