Journals / Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Utilization of Demolition Waste for Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage and Immobilization of Heavy Metals Released from Copper Flotation Tailings

Pages
58–62
Publication Date
2022-09-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that the pH increased from 2.21 (t=0) to 10.37 after 120 minutes of shaking in an orbital shaker.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD) and immobilization of heavy metals released from CFT (copper flotation tailings) were investigated using strongly alkaline demolition waste (DW), collected from the urban renewal areas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:During the tests, samples were collected from filtered leachates at regular intervals to monitor pH, SO42- and release of heavy metals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that the pH increased from 2.21 (t=0) to 10.37 after 120 minutes of shaking in an orbital shaker.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Copper flotation tailings · Demolition waste · Acid mine drainage

Abstract

In this study, the treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD) and immobilization of heavy metals released from CFT (copper flotation tailings) were investigated using strongly alkaline demolition waste (DW), collected from the urban renewal areas. Shake flask batch tests were conducted to assess the influence of time and different ratios of CFT/DW on the acidity and heavy metal release characteristics of the drainage water. During the tests, samples were collected from filtered leachates at regular intervals to monitor pH, SO42- and release of heavy metals. The results indicated that the pH increased from 2.21 (t=0) to 10.37 after 120 minutes of shaking in an orbital shaker. The highest SO42- release ([SO42-]=4558 mg L-1, t=0) was measured at 1:3 dose of CFT:DW application with 257 mg L-1 (pH=10.37) at the end of 120 minutes. The addition of DW almost completely reduced the release of heavy metals from CFT due to its high alkaline content. As a result, it was suggested that DW could effectively be used for the treatment of AMD and immobilization of heavy metals released from CFT.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOZSİN, G., KOÇ, E., YAYLALI, B., DEVECİ, H. (2022). Utilization of Demolition Waste for Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage and Immobilization of Heavy Metals Released from Copper Flotation Tailings. Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 58–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/705667

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akcil A, Koldas S. Acid mine drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies. J Clean Prod. 2006; 14: 1139-1145
  2. Tozsin G, Arol AI, Cayci G. Evaluation of pyritic tailings from a copper concentration plant for calcareous sodic soil reclamation. Physicochem Probl Miner Process. 2014; 50 (2): 693-704
  3. Pandey S, Kankeu EF, Redelinghuys J, Kim J, Kang M. Implication of biofilms in the sustainability of acid mine drainage and metal dispersion near coal tailings. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 788: 147851
  4. Menzel K, Barros L, García A, Figueroa RR, Estay H. Metal sulfide precipitation coupled with membrane filtration process for recovering copper from acid mine drainage. Sep Purif Technol. 2021; 270: 118721
  5. Silva D, Weber C, Oliveira C. Neutralization and uptake of pollutant cations from acid mine drainage (AMD) using limestones and zeolites in a pilot-scale passive treatment system. Miner Eng. 2021; 170: 107000
  6. Alcolea A, Vazquez M, Caparros A, Ibarra I, Garcia C, Linares R, Rodriguez R. Heavy metal removal of intermittent acid mine drainage with an open limestone channel. Miner Eng. 2012; 26: 86-98
  7. Valero AG, Martínez SM, Faz A, Rivera J, Acosta JA. Environmentally sustainable acid mine drainage remediation: use of natural alkaline material. J Water Process Eng. 2020; 33: 101064
  8. Huang WL, Lin DH, Chang NB, Song K. Recycling of C&D waste via a mechanical sorting process. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2002; 37: 23-37
  9. Marzouk M, Azab S. Environmental and economic impact assessment of construction and demolition waste disposal using system dynamics. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2014; 82: 41-49
  10. EPA. Advancing sustainable materials management: 2015 fact sheet. Assessing trends in material generation, recycling, composting, combustion with energy recovery and landfilling in the United States, July, 1-23; 2018
  11. Shi M, Ling TC, Gan B, Guo MZ. Turning concrete waste powder into carbonated artificial aggregates. Constr Build Mater. 2019; 199: 178-184
  12. Gencel O, Erdugmus E, Sutcu M, Oren OH. 2020. Effects of concrete waste on characteristics of structural fired clay bricks. Constr Build Mater. 2020; 255: 119362
  13. Sobek AA, Schuller WA, Freeman JR, Smith RM. Field and laboratory methods applicable to overburden and minesoils, EPA 600/2-78-054, 203; 1978
  14. EPA. Acid mine drainage prediction. EPA Technical Document 530 R 94 036, NTIS PB94-201829, Washington DC, USA; 1994
  15. EPA. Sulfate turbidimetric. Method 375.4, Methods