Journals / Marmara Medical Journal / 1991 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4

A review: Cochlear implants

Pages
167–169
Publication Date
1991-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since that time over 5000 individuals have been implanted with a variety of these devices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Electrical stimulation of the auditory system in deaf individuals has been first explained in 1935 by Andreev et al. and in 1940 by Jones et al, resulting in sensation of hearing (1,2).
📊
Key Findings & Data:These attempts are facilitated by Djourno et al who first implanted electrical devices in two subjects in 1957 (3).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since that time over 5000 individuals have been implanted with a variety of these devices.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:implants

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the auditory system in deaf individuals has been first explained in 1935 by Andreev et al. and in 1940 by Jones et al, resulting in sensation of hearing (1,2). These attempts are facilitated by Djourno et al who first implanted electrical devices in two subjects in 1957 (3). But this type of stimulation has been a controversy until 1974, when cochlear implant was successfully implanted by W.F. House. Since that time over 5000 individuals have been implanted with a variety of these devices.

Keywords
🔖

Cite This Article

Batman, Ç., Üneri, C., Şehitoijlu, M. (1991). A review: Cochlear implants. Marmara Medical Journal, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4, 167–169. https://ajindex.com/articles/689218

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Andreev AM, Gersuni CV, Volkhov AA. On the electrical excitability of the human ear. On the effect of alternating currents on the affected auditory apparatus. J Physiol USSR 1935; 18:250-265.