Journals / Marmara Medical Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Visual qualitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient quantification and Ki-67 proliferation index for predicting atypia in surgical meningiomas

Görsel kalitatif DW görüntüleme, ADC kantifikasyonu ve Ki-67 proliferasyon indeksinin referans

Pages
68–75
Publication Date
2018-04-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We suggest that visual qualitative evaluation of DW imaging may be helpful to predict atypia and the risk of recurrence in patients with surgically treated meningiomas.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The goal in this study was to investigate the efficiency of qualitative evaluation using DW imaging, ADC quantification, and Ki-67 proliferation labeling index in grading intracranial meningiomas compared to our reference standard histopathology.Methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:From our database, we enrolled 35 consecutive patients with pathologic report of a meningioma, conventional MR imaging, contrast-enhanced MR imaging, DW imaging and ADC maps.Results.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We suggest that visual qualitative evaluation of DW imaging may be helpful to predict atypia and the risk of recurrence in patients with surgically treated meningiomas.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:difüzyon ağırlıklı görüntüleme · meningiom · cerrahi

Abstract

Object. The goal in this study was to investigate the efficiency of qualitative evaluation using DW imaging, ADC quantification, and Ki-67 proliferation labeling index in grading intracranial meningiomas compared to our reference standard histopathology.Methods. From our database, we enrolled 35 consecutive patients with pathologic report of a meningioma, conventional MR imaging, contrast-enhanced MR imaging, DW imaging and ADC maps.Results. Eight patients (23%) had atypical meningioma (5 women and 3 men; mean age: 57.1±15.8 years); 27 (77%) had low-grade-typical (19 women, 8 men; mean age: 54.3±14.0 years). The most frequent histological subtype was the meningothelial type in both low-grade (37%) and atypical meningiomas (59%). The mean Ki-67 proliferation index for low-grade and atypical meningiomas were 2.31±1.44% (range: 1-5) and 7.37 ± 2.72% (range: 3-10), respectively. Meningiomas with Ki-67 proliferation index higher than 4% (except one) were atypical (p<0.001). In visual qualitative evaluation; diffusion restriction was significantly more common in atypical meningiomas (p<0.05). In quantitative evaluation, benign and atypical tumor groups had no significant difference in mean ADC values (p=0.471). Conclusion. We suggest that visual qualitative evaluation of DW imaging may be helpful to predict atypia and the risk of recurrence in patients with surgically treated meningiomas.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada amacımız, intrakranyal meningiomların derecelendirmesinde görsel kalitatif DW görüntüleme, ADC kantifikasyonu ve Ki-67 proliferasyon indeksinin referans standart histopatoloji ile karşılaştırıldığında etkinliğini araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Patolojisi meningiom olarak rapor edilmiş toplam 35 hastamızın, konvansiyonel MR görüntülemeleri, kontrastlı MR görüntülemeleri, DW görüntülemeleri ve ADC haritaları arşivimizden elde edilmiştir. Bulgular: Sekiz hastada (23%) atipik (5 kadın ve 3 erkek; ortalama yaş: 57.1±15.8 yıl); 27 hastada ise (77%) düşük dereceli tipik meningiom (19 kadın, 8 erkek; ortalama yaş: 54.3±14.0 yıl) vardı. Hem (59%) en sık histolojik alttip meningotelyal tip idi. Ki-67 proliferasyon indeksi, düşük dereceli ve atipik meningiomlarda sırasıyla 2.31±1.44% (aralık: 1-5) and 7.37 ± 2.72% (aralık: 3-10) olarak saptandı. Görsel kalitatif değerlendirmede, difüzyon kısıtlanması atipi meningiomlarda daha belirgindi (p<0.05). Kantitatif değerlendirmede, ADC değerlerinde heriki grup arasında anlamlı fark saptanmadı (p=0.471). Sonuç : Görsel kalitatif DW görüntüleme değerlendirmesinin, atipi ve cerrahi tedavi uygulanmış meningiom hastalarında tekrarlama riskinin tahmininde yardımcı olabileceğini önermekteyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

YİLMAZ, B., SENER, S., TEYYUB, H., AKAKIN, A., YAPICIER, Ö., DEMİR, M. K. (2018). Visual qualitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient quantification and Ki-67 proliferation index for predicting atypia in surgical meningiomas. Marmara Medical Journal, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 68–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/688328

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Commins DL, Atkinson RD, Burnett ME. Review of meningioma histopathology. Neurosurg Focus 2007;23:E3. Fatima Z, Motosugi U, Hori M, et al. Age-related white matter changes in high b-value q-space diffusion-weighted imaging. Neuroradiology 2013;55:253-259.
  2. Fatima Z, Motosugi U, Waqar AB, et al. Associations among q-space MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI and histopathological parameters in meningiomas. Eur Radiol 2013;23:2258-2263.
  3. Filippi CG, Edgar MA, Ulug AM, Prowda JC, Heier LA, Zimmerman RD. Appearance of meningiomas on diffusion-weighted images: correlating diffusion constants with histopathologic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:65-72.
  4. Hakyemez B, Yildirim N, Gokalp G, Erdogan C, Parlak M. The contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging to distinguishing typical from atypical meningiomas. Neuroradiology 2006;48:513-520.
  5. Hsu CC, Pai CY, Kao HW, Hsueh CJ, Hsu WL, Lo CP. Do aggressive imaging features correlate with advanced histopathological grade in meningiomas? J Clin Neurosci 2010;17:584-587.
  6. Klimas A, Drzazga Z, Kluczewska E, Hartel M. Regional ADC measurements during normal brain aging in the clinical range of b values: a DWI study. Clin Imaging 2013;37:637-644.
  7. Knopp EA, Cha S, Johnson G, et al. Glial neoplasms: dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 1999;211:791-798.
  8. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M: Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 168:497-505, 1988
  9. Ma C, Xu F, Xiao YD, Paudel R, Sun Y, Xiao EH. Magnetic resonance imaging of intracranial hemangiopericytoma and correlation with pathological findings. Oncol Lett 2014;8(5):2140-2144.
  10. Mahmood A, Caccamo DV, Tomecek FJ, Malik GM. Atypical and malignant meningiomas: a clinicopathological review. Neurosurgery 1993;33:955-963.
  11. Maier H, Ofner D, Hittmair A, Kitz K, Budka H. Classic, atypical, and anaplastic meningioma: three histopathological subtypes of clinical relevance. J Neurosurg 1992; 77:616-623.
  12. Nagar VA, Ye JR, Ng WH, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: diagnosing atypical or malignant meningiomas and detecting tumor dedifferentiation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1147-1152.
  13. Palma L, Celli P, Franco C, Cervoni L, Cantore G. Long-term prognosis for atypical and malignant meningiomas: a study of 71 surgical cases. J Neurosurg 1997;86:793-800.
  14. Park HJ, Kang HC, Kim IH, et al. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in atypical meningioma. J Neurooncol 2013;115:241-247. Pavelin S,