Journals / Marmara Medical Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3

Systemic immune-inflammation index and other inflammatory parameters in patients receiving biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs for inflammatory rheumatic disease

Pages
316–322
Publication Date
2022-10-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Significant and favourable changes were observed in all inflammatory parameters after treatment, and this variation remained stable as long as the drug was continued.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To investigate the short – and long-term dynamics in inflammation markers [systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte/ monocyte ratio (LMR)] before and after biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) or targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD) treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: Two hundred twenty-six patients (115 women, 47±13.8 years) were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Significant and favourable changes were observed in all inflammatory parameters after treatment, and this variation remained stable as long as the drug was continued.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Inflammation · Systemic immune inflammation index · Biological treatment

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the short – and long-term dynamics in inflammation markers [systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte/ monocyte ratio (LMR)] before and after biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) or targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD) treatment. Patients and Methods: Two hundred twenty-six patients (115 women, 47±13.8 years) were included. Age, gender, disease duration, and treatments were recorded retrospectively. Complete blood counts including neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet, monocyte and acute phase reactants were noted at the visit before the biological treatment, at the 3rd month, 6th month, and the last visit on medication. SII, NLR, PLR and LMR were calculated, and their dynamics over time were compared. Results: Significant changes were observed over time in all parameters reflecting inflammation (SII, NLR, PLR, LMR, ESR, and CRP) (p<0.05). In the correlation analysis of changes at baseline and six months, significant correlations with ΔESR were observed with ΔCRP, ΔPLR, ΔSII and ΔNLR (p<0.05), but no correlation with LMR was detected. Also, significant correlations with ΔCRP were noted with ΔNLR, ΔSII, ΔPLR, and ΔLMR (p<0.05). Conclusion: Significant and favourable changes were observed in all inflammatory parameters after treatment, and this variation remained stable as long as the drug was continued.

🔖

Cite This Article

GEZER, H. H., PEHLIVAN, O. (2022). Systemic immune-inflammation index and other inflammatory parameters in patients receiving biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs for inflammatory rheumatic disease. Marmara Medical Journal, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3, 316–322. https://ajindex.com/articles/688235

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Kim MJ, Lee EB, Song YW, Park JK. Profile of common inflammatory markers in treatment-naïve patients with systemic rheumatic diseases. Clin Rheumatol 2020;39:2899- 906.doi:10.1007/s10067.020.05049-9
  2. Kadiyoran C, Zengin O, Cizmecioglu HA, et al. Monocyte to lymphocyte ratio, Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and red cell distribution width are the associates with gouty arthritis. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Mukanova U, et al. The plateletto- lymphocyte ratio as an inflammatory marker in rheumatic diseases. Ann Lab Med 2019;39:345-57.doi:10.3343/ alm.2019.39.4.345 Walzik D, Joisten N, Zacher J, Zimmer P. Transferring clinically established immune inflammation markers into exercise physiology: focus on neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immuneinflammation index. Eur J Appl Physiol 2021;121:1803-14. doi:10.1007/s00421.021.04668-7
  3. Hemond CC, Glanz BI, Bakshi R, Chitnis T, Healy BC. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratios are independently associated with neurological disability and brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol 2019;19:23.doi:10.1186/s12883.019.1245-2
  4. Han BK, Wysham KD, Cain KC, Tyden H, Bengtsson AA, Lood C. Neutrophil and lymphocyte counts are associated with different immunopathologiceal mechanisms in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus Sci Med 2020;7: e000382.doi:10.1136/ Hoffmann JHO, Knoop C, Enk A, Hadaschik EN. Detailed Long-term dynamics of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio under biologic treatment reveals differential effects of tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin 12/23 antagonists. Acta Derm Venereol 2021;101:adv00568.doi:10.2340/actadv. v101.271 An I, Ucmak D, Ozturk M. The effect of biological agent treatment on neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-tolymphocyte ratio, mean platelet volume, and C-reactive protein in psoriasis patients. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 2020;37:202-6.doi:10.5114/ada.2020.94838 Turkmen K, Erdur FM, Ozcicek F, et al. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio better predicts inflammation than neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio in end-stage renal disease patients. Hemodial Int 2013;17:391-6.doi:10.1111/hdi.12040
  5. Geng Y, Shao Y, Zhu D, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. Sci Rep 2016;6:39482.doi:10.1038/srep39482 Strand V, Kimberly R, Isaacs JD. Biologic therapies in rheumatology: lessons learned, future directions. Nat Re