Journals / KONURALP TIP DERGİSİ / 2019 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Drug Eluting Stents versus Bare Metal Stents in ST- Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

ST-Segment Yükselmeli Miyokard İnfarktüsünde Çıplak Metal Stentler ve İlaç kaplı Stentlerin Karşilaştırılması

Pages
62–68
Publication Date
2019-03-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Despite increased incidence of MACE, re-MI and ST in 1-year, DES was found to be non-inferior to BMS at 2-year follow up.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of drug eluting stents (DES) with bare metal stents (BMS) in patients presented with ST- segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in a real world setting.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: One thousand five hundred ninety six STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention from January 2013 to March 2016 were enrolled to study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Despite increased incidence of MACE, re-MI and ST in 1-year, DES was found to be non-inferior to BMS at 2-year follow up.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Çıplak metal stent · ilaç kaplı stent · ST yükselmeli Myokard enfarktüsü

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of drug eluting stents (DES) with bare metal stents (BMS) in patients presented with ST- segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in a real world setting. Methods: One thousand five hundred ninety six STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention from January 2013 to March 2016 were enrolled to study. One thousand one hundred ninety four of them received BMS while 402 of them received DES. Patients were analyzed for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and stent thrombosis (ST). Results: There was no difference at 30 days in relation of MACE, all cause death, re-MI, TVR, TLR and ST. The cumulative incidence of MACE was significantly higher in DES group (9,2% vs. 7,0%, p = 0.02) at 1 year. Stent thrombosis and re-MI incidence were significantly higher in DES group (4,2% vs. 2,6%, p = 0.028, 6,9% vs. 4,8%, p = 0.015) respectively at 1 year. There was no statistically significant difference in relation of all cause death, TVR and TLR at 1 year. The statistically differences between groups vanished at 2 year and the groups looked similar. Male gender (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.94; p = 0.043) and presence of DM (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.32; p<0,001) were found to be independent predictors of 2-year MACE. Conclusion: Our study showed effectiveness and safety of DES in STEMI. Despite increased incidence of MACE, re-MI and ST in 1-year, DES was found to be non-inferior to BMS at 2-year follow up.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada ST segment elevasyonlu myokard enfarktüsünde ilaç kaplı stentleri ve çıplak metal stentleri karşılaştırmak istedik. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamıza merkezimize Ocak 2013 ve Mart 2016 tarihleri arasında başvuran toplam 1596 ST segment elevasyonlu myokard enfarktüsü alındı. Katılımcılar çıplak metal stent grubu (n=1194) ve ilaç kaplı stent grubu (n=402) olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Hastalar major kardiyak sonlanım acısından değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Grublar arasında ilk 30 günde major kardiyak sonlanım ve tüm ölüm açısından fark olmamasına rağmen, toplam major kardiyak sonlanım insidansı (9,2% vs. 7,0%, p=0.02), stent thrombozu (4,2% vs. 2,6%, p=0.028) ve tekrar myokard enfarktüsü (6,9% vs. 4,8%, p=0.015) ilaç kaplı stent grubunda yüksek bulundu. Bununla birlikte toplam mortalitede, hedef damar ve lezyon revaskülarizasyonunda istatiksel anlamlı fark bulunmadı. Major kardiyak sonlanım ve toplam mortalite 2 yıllık takipte gruplar arasında benzer bulundu. Erkek cinsiyet (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.94; p = 0.043) ve diyabet varlığı (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.32; p<0,001) major kardiyak sonlanım için bağımsız prediktör olarak saptandı.Sonuç: Sonuclarımız ilaç kaplı stentlerin çıplak metal stentler ile karşılaştırıldığında hem etkili hem de güvenli oldugunu gösterdi.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, A., TATLISU, M. A. (2019). Drug Eluting Stents versus Bare Metal Stents in ST- Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. KONURALP TIP DERGİSİ, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 62–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/686717

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Wijns, W., Kolh, P., Danchin, N., Di Mario, C., Falk, V., Folliguet, T.,. & von Segesser, L. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. European heart journal, 2010; 31: 2501-55.2. De Luca, G., Suryapranata, H., Stone, G. W., Antoniucci, D., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Kastrati, A.,. & Marino, P. Coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-regression analysis of randomized trials. International journal of cardiology, 2008: 126: 37-44.3. Spaulding, C., Teiger, E., Commeau, P., Varenne, O., Bramucci, E., Slama, M.,. & Henry, P. Four-year follow-up of TYPHOON (trial to assess the use of the CYPHer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent in acute myocardial infarction treated with BallOON angioplasty). JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2011: 4: 14-23.4. Stone, G. W., Witzenbichler, B., Guagliumi, G., Peruga, J. Z., Brodie, B. R., Dudek, D.,. & HORIZONS-AMI Trial Investigators. Heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor versus bivalirudin monotherapy and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): final 3-year results from a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 2011;377: 2193-204.5. Cutlip, D. E., Windecker, S., Mehran, R., Boam, A., Cohen, D. J., van Es, G. A.,. & Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials a case for standardized definitions. Circulation, 2007; 115: 2344-51.6. Angioplasty Substudy Investigators. A clinical trial comparing primary coronary angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO IIb). N Engl J Med, 1997; 336: 1621-8.7. Guo N, Maehara A, Mintz GS, He Y, Xu K, Wu X, Lansky AJ, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, Brodie B, Kellett MA Jr, Dressler O, Parise H, Mehran R, Stone GW. Incidence, mechanisms, predictors, and clinical impact of acute and late stent malapposition after primary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular ultrasound substudy of the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial. Circulation. 2010; 122: 1077–84. 8. Grines, C. L., Cox, D. A., Stone, G. W., Garcia, E., Mattos, L. A., Giambartolomei, A.,. & O'Neill, W. W. Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine, 1999; 341: 1949-