Journals / KONURALP TIP DERGİSİ / 2022 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Lifelong Learning Tendencies of Faculty of Medicine Students

Tıp Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Yaşam Boyu Öğrenme Eğilimleri

Pages
391–397
Publication Date
2022-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean levels of females in motivation and deprivation in regulating learning were significantly lower than males; males’ total score mean was significantly higher than females (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the lifelong learning tendencies of the students studying at the medical faculty and whether there is a relationship between lifelong learning tendencies and gender, grade level variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In the study, “Lifelong Learning Tendency Scale”, sociodemographic question form were applied face to face to the medical faculty students (n= 196) in the 2019-2020 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean levels of females in motivation and deprivation in regulating learning were significantly lower than males; males’ total score mean was significantly higher than females (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019-2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yaşam boyu öğrenme · Eğilim · Fakülte

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the lifelong learning tendencies of the students studying at the medical faculty and whether there is a relationship between lifelong learning tendencies and gender, grade level variables. Methods: In the study, “Lifelong Learning Tendency Scale”, sociodemographic question form were applied face to face to the medical faculty students (n= 196) in the 2019-2020 academic year. Statistical evaluation was made with the SPSS statistical program. Mean, standard deviation, frequency, percentage, Mann Whitney U, Kruskall Wallis tests were applied. Results: Means of motivation, persistence, deprivation in regulating learning, deprivation in curiosity subdimensions, total score average are 6.43 + 2.43; 18.9 + 6.23; 24.48 + 5.05; 24.5 + 6.54; 74.34 + 9.56 respectively. The mean levels of females in motivation and deprivation in regulating learning were significantly lower than males; males’ total score mean was significantly higher than females (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı tıp fakültesinde eğitim gören öğrencilerin yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimlerini ve yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri ile cinsiyet ve sınıf düzeyi değişkenleri arasında bir ilişki olup olmadığını belirlemektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırmada, 2019-2020 eğitim öğretim yılında tıp fakültesi öğrencilerine (n= 196) “Yaşam Boyu Öğrenme Eğilimi Ölçeği” ve sosyodemografik sorulardan oluşan form yüz yüze uygulanmıştır. İstatistiksel değerlendirme SPSS istatistik programı ile yapılmıştır. Ortalama, standart sapma, sıklık, yüzde, Mann Whitney U, Kruskall Wallis testleri uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Motivasyon, sebat, öğrenmeyi düzenlemede yoksunluk, merak yoksunluğu alt boyut ortalamaları, toplam puan ortalaması sırasıyla 6,43 + 2,43; 18,9 + 6,23; 24,48 + 5,05; 24,5 + 6,54; 74,34 + 9,56’dır. Kadınların motivasyon ve öğrenmeyi düzenlemede yoksunluk ortalamalarının erkeklere göre anlamlı olarak daha düşük; erkeklerin toplam puan ortalamalarının kadınlara göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GAYEF, A., ALPTÜRK, Ç. (2022). Lifelong Learning Tendencies of Faculty of Medicine Students. KONURALP TIP DERGİSİ, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 391–397. https://ajindex.com/articles/686640

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. REFERENCES 1.Arslan ŞF, Sarıkaya Ö, Vatansever K. Reliability and validity study of the lifelong learning tendency questionnaire for medical education. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. Eylül-Aralık 2016; Sayı 47. 2. Akbulut S, Erol A, Say S. Examining the relationship between lifelong learning tendencies and occupational anxiety of the prospective teachers. Journal of Education and New Approaches. 2018; 1(1), 1-11. 3. Şahin Ü, Sarıtaş E, Çatalbaş G. Lifelong learning tendencies of primary school teacher candidates. PAU Journal of Education. 2020; 48:374-389, doi: 10.9779/pauefd.572500. 4. Wain K. The learning society: postmodern politics. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 2000; 19 (1), 36-53. 5. Gencel İE. Prospective teachers’ perceptions towards lifelong learning competencies. Education and Science. 2013; Vol. 38, No 170, 237-252. 6. Tunca N, Şahin AS, Aydın Ö. Life-long learning tendencies of pre-service teachers. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education. 2015; Vol. 11, Issue 2, DOI: 10.17860/efd.92694. 7. Dinevski, D, Dinevski IV. The concepts of university lifelong learning provision in Europe. Transition Studies Review. 2004; 11 (3), 227-235. 8. Güleç İ, Çelik S, Demirhan B. What is lifelong learning? an evaluation on definition and scope. Sakarya University Journal of Education. 2012; 2 (3), 34-48. 9. Erdamar G, Demirkan Ö, Saraçoğlu G, Alpan G. The relationship between high school teachers’ life-long learning tendencies and their educational ınternet use self-effıcacy beliefs. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017; 17(2), 636-657. 10. Kurt E, Cevher YT, Arslan N. Pre-service turkish teachers' tendencies towards lifelong learning. Trakya Journal of Education. Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2019; 152-160. 11. Diker Coşkun Y, Demirel M. Lifelong learning tendencies of university students. H.U. Journal of Education. 2012; 42, 108-120. 12. Coşkun Diker Y. Examining lifelong learning tendencies of university students according to some variables. Hacettepe University, Social Science Institute, Educational Science Department. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ankara. 2009. 13. Şahin M, Akbaşlı S, Yelken TY. Key competences for lifelong learning; the case of prospective teachers. Educational Research and Review. 2010; 5 (10), 545-556. 14. Kangalgil M, Özgül F. Investigation of physical education and sports training students in lifelong learning trends. Journal of Global Sport and Education Research. 2018; I (1):64-72. 15. İ