Journals / KONURALP TIP DERGİSİ / 2022 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of Hematological and Biochemical Parameters and Cardiovascular Risk Scores in Patients Applying to the Obesity Outpatient Clinic

Obezite Polikliniğine Başvuran Hastalarda Hematoljik ve Biyokimyasal Parametrelerle Kardiyovasküler Risk Skorlarının Karşılaştırılması

Pages
544–550
Publication Date
2022-10-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When the patients were evaluated according to the BMI scores, it was found that 3.3% of them were underweight, 7.3% were normal weight, 22.5% were overweight and 66.9% were obese.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare hematological and biochemical parameters and cardiovascular risk scoring in patients admitted to the obesity outpatient clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, data of the patients who admitted to the Obesity Outpatient Clinic of Duzce University Research and Application Hospital between 2017 and 2018 were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When the patients were evaluated according to the BMI scores, it was found that 3.3% of them were underweight, 7.3% were normal weight, 22.5% were overweight and 66.9% were obese.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Obezite · BKI · NLR

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare hematological and biochemical parameters and cardiovascular risk scoring in patients admitted to the obesity outpatient clinic. Method: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, data of the patients who admitted to the Obesity Outpatient Clinic of Duzce University Research and Application Hospital between 2017 and 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Age, gender, smoking status, presence of Diabetes Mellitus (DM), and body mass index (BMI) were recorded and the cardiovascular risk of the patients was calculated by using the scoring system of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and Turkish Society of Cardiology (TSC). Results: A total of 631 participants were included in the study. The mean age was 38.9±12.1 (min=21, max=65) and 75.1% of the patients were female and 24.9% were male. It was observed that 19.2% of the patients were smokers, 4.6% had DM and 36.9% had insulin resistance. When the patients were evaluated according to the BMI scores, it was found that 3.3% of them were underweight, 7.3% were normal weight, 22.5% were overweight and 66.9% were obese. According to TSC risk scoring system, 51.4% of the patients were in low risk, 20.5% were in medium risk and 28.1% were in high risk category. According to the ESC risk scoring system, 83.5% of the patients were in low risk, 10.9% were in medium risk and 5.5% were in high risk category. According to both risk scoring systems, there were significant differences between the risk groups in terms of age, gender, BMI, and presence of DM (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, obezite polikliniğine başvuran hastalarda; hematolojik ve biyokimyasal parametreler ile kardiyovasküler risk skorlamasının karşılaştırmalı değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı-kesitsel olarak planlanan bu araştırmada, Düzce Üniversitesi Araştırma ve Uygulama Hastanesinin Obezite Polikliniğine 2017-2018 yılları arasında başvuran hastaların, dosya verileri retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Hastaların yaş, cinsiyet, sigara kullanımları, DM tanılarının varlığı, BKİ değerleri kaydedildi; kardiyovasküler risk faktörleri Avrupa ve Türkiye Kardiyoloji Dernekleri risk skorlamasına göre değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya %75,1’i kadın, %24,9’u erkek, 631 katılımcı dahil edilmiştir. Yaş ortalaması 38,9±12,1 (min=21-maks=65) olarak bulunmuştur. Hastaların %19,2’sinin sigara kullandığı, %4,6’sında DM ve %36,9’unda insülin direnci olduğu görülmüştür. Katılımcıların %3,3’ü zayıf, %7,3’ü normal kilolu, %22,5’i fazla kilolu ve %66,9’u obezdir. Türkiye Kardiyoloji Derneği risk skorlamasına göre hastaların %51,4’i düşük , %20,5’i orta ve %28,1’i yüksek risklidir. Avrupa Kardiyoloji Derneği risk skorlamasına göre ise hastaların %83,5’i düşük, %10,9’u orta ve %5,5’i yüksek risklidir. Her iki risk skorlamasına göre risk grupları arasında yaş, cinsiyet, beden kitle indeksi ve DM varlığı açısından anlamlı farklılık görüldü (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, N., GAMSIZKAN, Z., SUNGUR, M. A. (2022). Comparison of Hematological and Biochemical Parameters and Cardiovascular Risk Scores in Patients Applying to the Obesity Outpatient Clinic. KONURALP TIP DERGİSİ, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 544–550. https://ajindex.com/articles/686632

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. References 1. Wonca Avrupa. Aile Hekimliği Avrupa Tanımı. Ankara, Türkiye Aile Hekimleri Uzmanlık Derneği Yayınları, 2011
  2. World Health Organization. Facts about overweight and obesity. Ara. 2012. URL:https://www.who.int/news- room/fact- sheets/detail/obesity- and-overweight. adresinden 11.12.2021 3. Bhosale VV, Singh S, Srivastava M, Pathak P, Prakash S, Sonkar S, Misra AK, Misra R, Ghatak A. A case control study of clinical and biochemical parameters of metabolic syndrome with special attention among young and middle aged population. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 Jul-Aug
  3. 13(4):2653-9. 4. Faulkner JL. Obesity-associated cardiovascular risk in women: hypertension and heart failure. Clin Sci (Lond). 2021 Jun 25
  4. 135(12):1523-44. 5. Bisciglia A, Pasceri V, Irini D, Varveri A, Speciale G. Risk Factors for Ischemic Heart Disease. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2019
  5. 14(2):86-94., 6. Ural D. Kardiyovasküler risk belirlenmesi ve tabakalandırılmasının kılavuzluğuyla yapılan tedavi yaklaşımı: Öngör, önle ve bireyselleştir. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2011
  6. Graham I, Atar D, Borch-Johnsen K, Boysen G, Burell G, Cifkova R, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J 2007
  7. 414 8. Parums DV. Editorial: The 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines on the Real-World Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD). Med Sci Monit. 2021
  8. e935172. 9. Wilson, PW, et. al. Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease Using Risk Factor Categories. Circulation 1998 97 (18): 1837-47 10. Brady W, de Souza K. The HEART score: A guide to its application in the emergency department. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018
  9. 18(2):47-51. 11. Lagergren M, Fratiglioni L, Hallberg IR, Berglund J, Elmståhl S, Hagberg B, et al. A longitudinal study integrating population, care and social services data. The Swedish National study on Aging and Care (SNAC). Aging clinical and experimental research. 2004
  10. 16(2):158-68. 12. Finegold JA, Asaria P, Francis DP. Mortality from ischaemic heart disease by country, region, and age: statistics from World Health Organisation and United Nations. International journal of cardiology. 2013
  11. 168(2):934-45 13. Savji N, Rockman CB, Skolnick AH, Guo Y, Adelman MA, R