SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kocaeli Journal of Science and Engineering / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Pyrolytic Degradation Behavior of Biomass Seeds: Cherry And Peach Seed

Meltem KIZILCA ÇORUH
Hatice BAYRAKÇEKEN
Pages
46–51
Publication Date
2020-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The average activation energies (Ea) and pre-exponential factor (A) obtained from both models for cherry and peach seed were found as: Ea=125.77 kJ mol-1 and A=13.03 min-1 for KAS; Ea=135.59 kJ mol-1 and A= 27.77 min-1 for FWO and Ea=204.93 kJ mol-1 and A=34.12 min-1 for KAS; Ea=213.47 kJ mol-1 and A= 44.34 min-1 for FWO, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pyrolytic degradation behavior of peach and cherry seed were investigated by thermal analysis techniques such as thermogravimetric (TG) and derivative thermogravimetric (DTG).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pyrolysis study of peach and cherry seed, which are the sources of plant biomass, are carried out under air flow rate of 10 mL.min-1 and heating rates of 2.5-5-10 and 20 K min-1 in the temperature range of 298-1173 K by means of thermal analysis techniques.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The average activation energies (Ea) and pre-exponential factor (A) obtained from both models for cherry and peach seed were found as: Ea=125.77 kJ mol-1 and A=13.03 min-1 for KAS; Ea=135.59 kJ mol-1 and A= 27.77 min-1 for FWO and Ea=204.93 kJ mol-1 and A=34.12 min-1 for KAS; Ea=213.47 kJ mol-1 and A= 44.34 min-1 for FWO, respectively.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biomass · Flyn–Wall–Ozawa · Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose

Abstract

Pyrolytic degradation behavior of peach and cherry seed were investigated by thermal analysis techniques such as thermogravimetric (TG) and derivative thermogravimetric (DTG). Pyrolysis study of peach and cherry seed, which are the sources of plant biomass, are carried out under air flow rate of 10 mL.min-1 and heating rates of 2.5-5-10 and 20 K min-1 in the temperature range of 298-1173 K by means of thermal analysis techniques. The activation energy and pre-exponential factor were determined with different methods as Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose (KAS) and Flyn–Wall–Ozawa (FWO). The average activation energies (Ea) and pre-exponential factor (A) obtained from both models for cherry and peach seed were found as: Ea=125.77 kJ mol-1 and A=13.03 min-1 for KAS; Ea=135.59 kJ mol-1 and A= 27.77 min-1 for FWO and Ea=204.93 kJ mol-1 and A=34.12 min-1 for KAS; Ea=213.47 kJ mol-1 and A= 44.34 min-1 for FWO, respectively.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇORUH, M. K., BAYRAKÇEKEN, H. (2020). Pyrolytic Degradation Behavior of Biomass Seeds: Cherry And Peach Seed. Kocaeli Journal of Science and Engineering, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 46–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/685884

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Özsina G., Eren Pütün A., 2019. TGA/MS/FT-IR Study for Kinetic Evaluation and Evolved Gas Analysis of a Biomass/PVC Co-pyrolysis Process. Energy Conversion and Management, 182, pp.143–153
  2. Demirbaş A., 2001. Biomass Resource Facilities and Biomass Conversion Processing for Fuels and Chemicals. Energy Conversion and Management, 182, pp.143–153
  3. Zhang L., Xu C., Champagne P., 2010. Overview of Recent Advances in Tthermo-chemical Conversion of Biomass. Energy Conversion and Management, 51, pp. 969–982
  4. Samolada M. C., Stoicos T., Vasalos I. A., 1990. An Investigation of the Factors Controlling the Pyrolysis Product Yield of Greek Wood Biomass in a Fluidized Bed. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 18, pp. 127-141
  5. Kızılca M., Copur M., 2016. Investigation of the Thermal Decomposition Kinetics of Chalcopyrite Ore Concentrate Using Thermogravimetric Data. Chemical Engineering Communications, 203, pp. 692-704
  6. Özçimen D., Ersoy-Meriçboyu A., 2008. A Study on the Carbonization of Grapeseed and Chestnut Shell. Fuel Process Technol, 89, pp. 1041-1046
  7. Özçimen D., Ersoy-Meriçboyu A., 2010. Characterization of Bio Char and Bio-oil Samples Obtained from Carbonization of Various Biomass Materials. Renewable Energy, 35, pp. 1319-1324
  8. Luz Bengoechea M., Sancho Begon I., Estrella I., Gomez-Cordoves C., Hernandez M. T., 1997. Phenolic Composition of Industrially Manufactured Pure´es and Concentrates from Peach and Apple Fruits. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 45, 4071−4075
  9. Özsin G., Eren Pütün A., 2018. Co-pyrolytic Behaviors of Biomass and Polystyrene: Kinetics, Thermodynamics and Evolved Gas Analysis, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 35, pp. 428-437
  10. Kantürk Figen A., Sarı Yılmaz M., Pişkin S., 2010. Structural Characterization and Dehydration Kinetics of Kırka Inderite Mineral: Application of Non-isothermal Models. Materials Characterization, 61, pp. 640-647
  11. Kızılca M., Copur M., 2017. Thermal Dehydration of Colemanite: Kinetics and Mechanism Determined Using the Master Plots Method. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 56, pp. 259–27
  12. Ahmed A., Afolabi E. A., Garba M. U., Musa U., Alhassan A,. Ishaq I., 2019. Effect of Particle Size on Thermal Decomposition and Devolatilization Kinetics of Melon Seed Shell. Chemical Engineering Communications, 206, pp. 1228–1240
  13. Isıtan S., Ceylan S., Topcu Y., Hintz C., Tefft J., Chellappa T., Guo J., Goldfarb J. L., 2016. Product Quality Optimization in an Integrated B