Journals / Kocaeli Journal of Science and Engineering / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Local Geology Effects on Soil Amplification and Predominant Period in Düzce Basin, NW Turkey

Pages
160–170
Publication Date
2021-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that the site amplifications at stations are directly related to the local geology underlying the stations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Amplification and predominant periods of soils in Düzce Basin were investigated by analysing the data sets of last two major earthquakes and aftershocks of Kocaeli and Düzce earthquakes occurred in 1999 with a magnitude of Mw:7.4 and Mw:7.2, respectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data set includes 31 strong gorund motion records from five strong ground motion stations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that the site amplifications at stations are directly related to the local geology underlying the stations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Local Geology · Soil Amplification · Predominant Period

Abstract

Amplification and predominant periods of soils in Düzce Basin were investigated by analysing the data sets of last two major earthquakes and aftershocks of Kocaeli and Düzce earthquakes occurred in 1999 with a magnitude of Mw:7.4 and Mw:7.2, respectively. Two different methods named horizontal/vertical spectral acceleration ratio (HVSAR) and soil-to-rock Response Spectral Acceleration Ratio (RSAR) were used to determine soil amplifications for various periods in Düzce Basin. The data set includes 31 strong gorund motion records from five strong ground motion stations. It was found that the site amplifications at stations are directly related to the local geology underlying the stations. Averaging the residuals between the predicted and observed PGAs resulted in soil amplification from 1.33 to 2.33. The HVSAR method presented soil amplification values between 2.7 and 10 and predominant period values between 0.4 and 0.7 s. Soil amplification values from 1.5 to 14 and predominant periods from 0.5 to 0.8 s were obtained by the RSAR method. High site amplifications and predominant periods mainly depend on the thickness of lithological variances accompanied by low physical and geotechnical properties of alluvial deposits.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUTAŞ, E., CORUK, Ö., KARAKAŞ, A. (2021). Local Geology Effects on Soil Amplification and Predominant Period in Düzce Basin, NW Turkey. Kocaeli Journal of Science and Engineering, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 160–170. https://ajindex.com/articles/685873

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Polat O., Eyidoğan H., Haessler H., Cisternas H., Philip H., 2002. Analysis and interpretation of the aftershock sequence of the August 17, 1999, İzmit (Turkey) earthquake. Journal Seismology, 6(3), pp. 287-306
  2. Bouin M.P., Bouchon M., Karabulut H., Aktar M., 2004. Rupture process of the 1999 November 12 Düzce (Turkey) earthquake deduced from strong motion and Global Positioning System measurements. Geophysical Journal International, 159, pp. 207-211
  3. Taymaz T., 1999. Seismotectonics of the Marmara region: Source characteristics of 1999 Golcuk-Sapanca-Duzce earthquakes. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Kocaeli Earthquake. Istanbul, Turkey, 2-5 December, pp. 55-78
  4. Pucci S., Martini P.M., Pantosti D., 2008. Preliminary slip rate estimates for the Düzce segment of the North Anatolian Fault Zone from offset geomorphic markers. Geomorphology, 97, pp. 538-554
  5. Pucci S., Martini, P. M., Pantosti, D. 2008. Preliminary slip rate estimates for the Düzce segment of the North Anatolian Fault Zone from offset geomorphic markers. Geomorphology, 97, pp. 538-554
  6. Utkucu M., Nalban S.S., McCloskey J., Steacy S., Alptekin Ö., 2003 Slip distribution and stress changed associated with the 1999 November 12, Düzce (Turkey), Geophysical Journal International, 153(1), pp. 229-241
  7. Rathje E. M., Stewart J. P., Baturay M. B., Bray J. D., Bardet J. P., 2006. Strong ground motions and damage patterns from the 1999 Düzce earthquake in Turkey. Journal Earthquake Engineering, 10(5), pp. 693-724
  8. Özmen B., 2000 12 Kasım 1999 Düzce Depreminin Konut ve İşyeri Hasarları (Rakamsal Verilerle), Bayındırlık ve İskan Bakanlığı, Afet İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Deprem Araştırma Dairesi, Ankara, pp. 155-214
  9. Aki K., 1993. Local site effects on weak and strong ground motion. Tectonophysics, 218, pp. 93-111
  10. Bard P., 1999. Microtremor measurements: A tool for site effect estimation. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion. Yokohama, Japan, 3, pp. 1251-1279
  11. Seo K., 1994. On the applicability of microtremors to engineering purpose, Preliminary report of the Joint ESG Research on Microtremors after the 1993 Kushiro-Oki (Hokkaido, Japan) earthquake. Proceedings of 10th European Conference on Earthquake, 4, pp. 2643-2648
  12. Navarro M., Enomoto T., Sánchez F. J., Matsuda I., Iwatate T., Posadas A., Luzón F., Vidal F., Seo K., 2001. Surface soil effects study using short-period micr