Journals / Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi / 2017 / 2017

Aletheia and Artwork Relationship in Plato and Heidegger

Platon ve Heidegger’de Aletheia ve Sanat Yapıtı İlişkisi

Pages
51–68
Publication Date
2017-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The relation between cognition and existence is a hierarchical onto-epistemological conception of Plato, where the human mind and body capacity is directly related to its ontic and epistemological existence when evaluated in the context of the forms of existence that it can know the truth from; for Heidegger, the ontic opens a door to knowing that because it merely an ontic is, and in this way comes an understanding that every existence, including the existence of the artwork, can be associated with the act of knowing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The concept of Aletheia which corresponds to an epistemological and ontological awareness over about the disclosedness, occupies fundemental places in the thought-systems of both Heidegger and Plato.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Either of the philosophers have not only made an examination on the origin and the possibility of this concept; but they have also made an inquiry on the original value of its existence-forms, which are revealed in the relationship of the concept with the work of art.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The relation between cognition and existence is a hierarchical onto-epistemological conception of Plato, where the human mind and body capacity is directly related to its ontic and epistemological existence when evaluated in the context of the forms of existence that it can know the truth from; for Heidegger, the ontic opens a door to knowing that because it merely an ontic is, and in this way comes an understanding that every existence, including the existence of the artwork, can be associated with the act of knowing.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Aletheia · Sanat Yapıtı · Platon

Abstract

The concept of Aletheia which corresponds to an epistemological and ontological awareness over about the disclosedness, occupies fundemental places in the thought-systems of both Heidegger and Plato. Either of the philosophers have not only made an examination on the origin and the possibility of this concept; but they have also made an inquiry on the original value of its existence-forms, which are revealed in the relationship of the concept with the work of art. The relation between cognition and existence is a hierarchical onto-epistemological conception of Plato, where the human mind and body capacity is directly related to its ontic and epistemological existence when evaluated in the context of the forms of existence that it can know the truth from; for Heidegger, the ontic opens a door to knowing that because it merely an ontic is, and in this way comes an understanding that every existence, including the existence of the artwork, can be associated with the act of knowing.

Özet

Gizlenmemişlik üzerine ontolojik ve epistemolojik bir farkındalığa karşılık gelen aletheia, Platon ve Heidegger›in düşünce dizgesinde temel bir konuma sahiptir. Her iki düşünür de kavramın yalnızca kökenine ve olanağına ilişkin bir inceleme yapmakla kalmamış aynı zamanda kavramın sanat yapıtı ile olan ilişkisinde açığa çıkan varoluş biçimlerinin kökensel değerine ilişkin bir sorgulama gerçekleştirmişlerdir. Biliş ve varoluş arasındaki ilinti, kendisinden hakikatin bilinebileceği varoluş biçimleri zemininde değerlendirildiğinde Platon için insanın akıl ve beden kapasitesinin kendi ontik ve epistemolojik varlığıyla doğrudan ilişkilendirildiği hiyerarşik bir onto-pistemolojik kavrayışa; Heidegger için ise ontik olanın, yalnızca ontik olan olması yeterliliğinde bilmeye kapı araladığı ve bu sayede de sanat yapıtı varoluşu dahil her bir varoluşun bilme edimiyle ilişkilendirilebildiği bir kavrayışa çıkmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAHAN, D., AŞKIN, Z. (2017). Aletheia and Artwork Relationship in Plato and Heidegger. Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi, 2017, 51–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/68581

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Aristoteles. (1996). Metafizik, (Çev. A. Arslan), İstanbul:
  2. Sosyal Yayınları Brun, J. (2007). Platon Ve Akademia, (Çev. I. Yerguz), Ankara:
  3. Dost Yayınları Halliwell, S. (2002). The Aesthetics Of Mimesis- Ancient Texts and Modern Problems, New Jersey: Princeton University Press Hard, R. (2004). The Routledge Handbook Of Greek Mythology, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group Heidegger, M. (1977).
  4. Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann Heidegger, M. (2008). Varlık Ve Zaman, (Çev. K.H. Ökten),Istanbul: Agora Kitaplığı Moles, J. N. (2015). Aletheia: Remembering And Enlivening, Journal Of Applied Hermeneutics, April -22 Monchamp, M. (2008).
  5. Aletheia- Truth Of The Past, Journal Humanity Neumaier, O. (2010). Are Works of Art Simply Imitations Of Shadows? (Ed. Diana Teters): Metamophoses Of The Worlds: Traces, Shadows, Reflections, Echoes and Metaphors, pp: 308-326
  6. Peters, F. (2004). Antik Yunan Felsefesi Terimleri Sözlüğü, (Çev. Hakkı Hünler), İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları Platon, (1975). Diyaloglar, (Çev. Hürriyet Kolektif), Istanbul: Hürriyet Yayınları Platon, (2000). Symposion- Şölen, (Çev. Cenap Karakaya), İstanbul: Sosyal Yayınları Platon, (2007). Yasalar, (Çev. S. Babür, C. Şentuna), İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınları Platon, (2009). Devlet, (Çev. S. Eyüboğlu- M. Cimgöz), İstanbul: İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları Platon, (2010). Diyaloglar, (Çev. Kolektif), İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi