Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 19

A "Global" Strategy on Constructing "Regional" Advantage By RIS

Pages
511–532
Publication Date
2019-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this case the intervention of the public need to focus on the malfunctions in the relations, not to overall system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT Studies on regional innovation systems in various geographical levels are gradually increasing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:From this point of view Regional Innovation Systems (RIS) play a strategical role on competitive ability and innovation ability of regions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this case the intervention of the public need to focus on the malfunctions in the relations, not to overall system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Regional Innovation · Regional Innovation System (RIS) · Related variety

Özet

ABSTRACT Studies on regional innovation systems in various geographical levels are gradually increasing. The aim of this study is to reveal the importance of region spatially in the development of innovative capacity. By the regionalization of innovation policies, needs of a specific region or company are exhibited more effectively and it becomes easier to monitor and apply the precautions to be taken. Creating a regional advantage starts with identifying the environments where knowledge production, innovation and entrepreneurship actualise. From this point of view Regional Innovation Systems (RIS) play a strategical role on competitive ability and innovation ability of regions. Systematic malfunctions than can prevent innovation system from operating efficiently can be in question. In this case the intervention of the public need to focus on the malfunctions in the relations, not to overall system. In this sense the regulatory role of the government needs to focus on process-based issues such as developing regional knowledge infrastructure, catalysing to access external knowledge sources, increasing the human capital quality, supporting clusters, establishing networks among innovative actors and supporting them.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYKUL, A., MADEN, S. I. (2019). A "Global" Strategy on Constructing "Regional" Advantage By RIS. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 19, 511–532. https://ajindex.com/articles/682290

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. ReferencesAmin, A. and Cohendet, P. (2003)
  2. Architectures of Knowledge, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  3. Ascani A., Cresceuzi R., Iammarino S., 2012, Regional Economic Development. A. Review Search WP01/03, 7th European Community Framework Programme, European Commission.Asheim, B. T. and Coenen, L. (2006) Contextualising Regional Innovation Systems in a Globalising Learning Economy: On Knowledge Bases and Institutional Frameworks. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 (1), 163-173.
  4. Asheim, B. T. and Gertler, M. S. (2005) The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems. In Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. and Nelson, R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 291-317.
  5. Asheim, B. T. et al. (eds.) (2003) Regional Innovation Policy for Small-Medium Enterprises. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar. Asheim, B., et al. (2005). Regional innovation system policy: A knowledge--‐based approach." CIRCLE (Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy), Working Paper 13. Berg Jensen, M. et al. (2005) Forms of knowledge, modes of innovation and innovation systems. Unpublished paper for CIRCLE (Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy) Lecture Series on ‘Institutions, Innovation and Competence Building’, September 15th, Lund University (lecture by Ed Lorenz, one of the co-authors of the paper).Boschma, R.A. & K. Frenken (2006), Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography, Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 6, pp. 273-302.
  6. Boschma, R.A. (2004), The competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective, Regional Studies, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1001-1014.
  7. Boschma, R.A. (2005a), Proximity and innovation. A critical assessment, Regional Studies, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 61-74.
  8. Boschma, R.A. (2005b), Rethinking regional innovation policy. The making and breaking of regional history, in: G. Fuchs and P. Shapira (eds.), Rethinking regional innovation and change. Path dependency or regional breakthrough?, Springer Verlag, Dordrecht, pp. 249-271.
  9. Boschma, R.A. and J.G. Lambooy (1999), Evolutionary economics and economic geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 9, nr. 4, pp. 411-29.
  10. Charles, D. (2003) Universities and Territorial Development: Reshaping the Regional Role of UK Universities. Local Economy 18 (1), 7-20.
  11. Chatterton, P. and Goddard, J. (2003) The Response of HEIs to Regional Needs. In Rutten, R., Boekema, F. and Kuijpers, E.