Journals / Mersin University Journal of Maritime Faculty / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

DETERMINING ACTORS FOR POTENTIAL KUŞADASI MARINE TOURISM CLUSTER*

Pages
28–36
Publication Date
2021-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Once the actors are identified, it is possible for the cluster to be implemented and to support regional development by providing competitive advantage and cooperation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Industrial Clusters are regional concentrations of businesses and organizations that compete with each other, complement and depend on each other.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The reason for this is that clustering provides significant benefits to sectoral, regional and national competitiveness.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Once the actors are identified, it is possible for the cluster to be implemented and to support regional development by providing competitive advantage and cooperation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cluster · Cluster Actor · Kuşadası Region

Abstract

Industrial Clusters are regional concentrations of businesses and organizations that compete with each other, complement and depend on each other. Clustering phenomenon is developing rapidly both in the world and in Turkey. The reason for this is that clustering provides significant benefits to sectoral, regional and national competitiveness. In this study, it is aimed to determine the cluster actors of a potential Kuşadası Marine Tourism Cluster. Kuşadası Marine Tourism actors are determined by the face-to-face interview method, which is a qualitative research method, and studies in the literature. Kuşadası region have a cruise terminal, a marina, surface and underwater sports center, daily excursion tour operators, yacht manufacturing, maintenance and repair enterprises, food, beverage and entertainment businesses, yacht agencies, cruise travel agencies and tour operators, transportation businesses and small industrial sites, etc. The gathering of service providers in the value chain is not sufficient for clustering. Public institutions, chambers and associations, research institutions should also be included in the cluster ecosystem according to Porter’s Clustering Theory. Potential Kuşadası Marine Tourism Cluster actors are examined in four different groups. These are service providers (firms), government/policymakers, hybrid organizations and academia. To sum up, it is of great importance to carry out the actor analysis carefully in a region where potential clustering may occur. Once the actors are identified, it is possible for the cluster to be implemented and to support regional development by providing competitive advantage and cooperation.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖK, G. T., PAKER, S. (2021). DETERMINING ACTORS FOR POTENTIAL KUŞADASI MARINE TOURISM CLUSTER*. Mersin University Journal of Maritime Faculty, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 28–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/681328

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alüftekin, N., Yüksel, Ö., Ayşegül, T. A. Ş., Çakar, G., and Bayraktar, F. (2009). Küresel Krizden Çıkışta Kümelenme Modeli: Tekstil ve Hazır Giyim Sektörü Örneği. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 5(10): 1-19.
  2. Alsaç, F. (2010). Bölgesel Gelişme Aracı Olarak Kümelenme Yaklaşımı ve Türkiye İçin Kümelenme Destek Modeli Önerisi. (Dissertation), DPT, Ankara.
  3. Andersson, T., Schwaag-Serger, S., Sorvik, J., & Hansson, E. W. (2004). The cluster policies whitebook. 49: 371-402
  4. Arsezen, P. and Yüzsever, I. C. (2017). Turkey Marine Tourism Clustering Situation Analysis. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 4 (13), pp. 1325:1337. Artun, C. (2016). Determining the Potential of Marine Tourism Cluster in Fethiye. Journal of Marine Tourism. 1 (2), Pp. 1-7.
  5. Aziz, K. A. and Norhashim, M. (2008). Cluster‐Based Policy Making: Assessing Performance and Sustaining Competitiveness. Review of Policy Research. 25(4): 349-375.
  6. Bakan, İ., Bulu, M. and Eraslan, H. (2009). Kümelenmeler ve İnovasyona Etkisi: Türk Turizm Sektöründe Uygulamalar. Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi. 5(1). Bapista, R. (2001). Geographical Clusters and Innovation Diffusion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 66(1): 31-46
  7. Bulu, M. (2005). Türk KOBİ’leri için Rekabet Stratejileri. Organize Sanayi Gazetesi. OSTİM. Bulu, M. and Eraslan, H. (2004).
  8. Kümelenme Yaklaşımı, Çağdaş Yönetim Yaklaşımları: İlkeler, Kavramlar ve Yaklaşımlar. Bakan, İ.(Ed), Beta, İstanbul Bulu, M., Eraslan, H. and Şahin, Ö. (2004). Elmas (Diamond) Modeli ile Ankara Bilişim Kümelenmesi Rekabet Analizi. 3.Ulusal Bilgi Ekonomi ve Yönetim Kongresi, Osmangazi Üniversitesi. Access data: 25.02.2021.
  9. Cansız, M. (2011). Türkiye'de Kümelenme Politikaları Ve Uygulamaları. OSB Üst Kurulu. Cluster Management Guide (2007). Kümelenme Temel Prensip ve İlkeleri; İş ve İnşaat Makineleri Kümesi (İSİM), Turkey. Doğan, O. (2019). Deniz Turizminde Kümelenme Bağlaminda Marina İşletmeciliğinde Stratejik Yönetişim: Muğla İli Örneği. Doctora Thesis, Akdeniz University, Antalya DTM (2009). Türkiye’de Kümelenme Politikasının Geliştirilmesi Projesi. Enright, M. J. (2000). The Globalization of Competition and The Localization of Competitive Advantage: Policies Towards Regional Clustering. In The Globalization of Multinational Enterprise Activity and Economic Development (Pp. 303-331).
  10. Palgrave Macmillan, London. Enright, M. and Roberts, B. (2001). Regional Clustering in Australia. Australian Journal of Management. 26: 68 Eraydı