Journals / Mersin University Journal of Maritime Faculty / 2019 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

FREIGHT TRANSPORT MODE CHOICE WITH STATED PREFERENCE METHOD: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Pages
17–29
Publication Date
2019-12-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, it has been found that the features involved as effective variables in the preferred freight route / mode selection experiments indicated are most strongly confirmed by applying more mechanical, more easily and less subjective applied approaches to the literature review.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Modeling transport choice is one of the most important components of transportation analysis since it determines the parties to be involved, the resources to be used and the impact made on the environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Many different techniques have been used to analyze choice modelling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, it has been found that the features involved as effective variables in the preferred freight route / mode selection experiments indicated are most strongly confirmed by applying more mechanical, more easily and less subjective applied approaches to the literature review.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Freight Forwarders · Freight Transportation · Mode Choice

Abstract

Modeling transport choice is one of the most important components of transportation analysis since it determines the parties to be involved, the resources to be used and the impact made on the environment. Many different techniques have been used to analyze choice modelling. As a principle, all choice modelling techniques suppose that goods/services can be defined in terms of their characteristics or attributes and the levels. In stated preference methods, decision makers evaluate and decide on the multi-attribute and mutually exclusive alternatives they prefer. Aim of the study is to analyze the studies that use the stated preference method in transport mode choice in terms of transportation modes, study area, decision-makers, decision variables and general findings. For this purpose, a systematic literature review method has been conducted for freight mode choice using “stated preference method”. A systematic literature review from relevant academic studies has indicated such transportation choice variables through as transport time, transport cost, transport mode, flexibility, frequency, reliability, risk of delay/punctuality, risk of loss and damage and service quality. To analyze the freight transport choice, discrete choice experiments which are one of the stated preference techniques have been the most preferred methods. According to literature review, most effective variables in choosing freight transport mode are transport cost, transport time and reliability. Additionally, it has been found that the features involved as effective variables in the preferred freight route / mode selection experiments indicated are most strongly confirmed by applying more mechanical, more easily and less subjective applied approaches to the literature review.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖK, G. T., DEVECİ, D. A. (2019). FREIGHT TRANSPORT MODE CHOICE WITH STATED PREFERENCE METHOD: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. Mersin University Journal of Maritime Faculty, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 17–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/217015

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Adamowicz, V. and Boxall, P. (2001). “Future Directions of Stated Choice Methods for Environment Valuation.” Choice Experiments: A New Approach to Environmental Valuation. London, UK, April 10. Akay, D. (2016). Uluslararası Lojistikte Taşıma Modu Seçimini Etkileyen Faktörler: Türkiye Uygulaması ve bir Model Önerisi, Master Thesis: Karatay University, Social Science Institute. Alpizar, F. and Carlsson, F. (2001). “Policy Implications and Analysis of the Determinants of Travel Mode Choice, an Application of Choice Experiments to Metropolitan Costa Rica.” Costa Rica: Working Paper in Economics no. 5, Department of Economics, Göteborg University. Anciaes, P.R.; Jones, P.; Metcalfe, P.J. (2018). A Stated Preference Model to Value Reductions in Community Severance Caused by Roads.” Transportation Policy, Vol. 64, pp. 10–19.
  2. Anderson, N. H. (1970). “Functional Measurement and Psychophysical Judgment.” Psychol. Re Vol. 77, pp. 153-70
  3. Arencibia, A. I., Feo-Valero, M., García-Menéndez, L., and Román, C. (2015). “Modelling Mode Choice for Freight Transport Using Advanced Choice Experiments.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 75, pp. 252-267.
  4. Arunotayanun, K., and Polak, J. W. (2011). “Taste heterogeneity and market segmentation in freight shippers’ mode choice behavior.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 47, No.2, pp. 138-148.
  5. Bacca, J., Baldiris, S. and Fabregat, R. (2014). “Augmented Reality Trends in Education: A Systematic Review of Research and Applications,” Journal of Education, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 133–149, 2014.
  6. Bando, T., Fukuda, D, Wicaksono, A. and Wardan, L. K. (2015). “Stated Preference Analysis for New Public Transport in a Medium-sized Asian City: A Case Study in Malang, Indonesia.” Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol.11. Banomyong R. and Beresford K.C. (2001). “Multimodal Transport: The Case of Laotian Garment Exporters. International Journal of Physical Distribution.” Logistics Management, Vol. 31, pp. 651-673
  7. Bardi, E. (1973). “Carrier Selection from One Mode.” Transportation Journal, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 22-29.
  8. Bateman, I.J., Carson, R.T., Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Ozedemiroglu, E., Pearce, D., Sugden, J.and Swanson, J. (2002). Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. Bergantino, A. S. and Bolis, S. (2008). Monetary Values of Transport Service At