SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama / 2013 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Türk Öğretim Üyelerinin Elektronik Kitap Kullanim Durum ve Tercihleri

Sakine ÖNGÖZ
Pages
33–54
Publication Date
2013-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

What comes to the forefront in e-book reading preference is that lecturers read materials both from a monitor and in printed form (a combination of both media).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this survey study is to determine the electronic book usage and preferences of Turkish lecturers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:E-books are ranked third (74.8%) among electronic resources used by lecturers use and they are mostly used for research purposes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:What comes to the forefront in e-book reading preference is that lecturers read materials both from a monitor and in printed form (a combination of both media).
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:elektronik kitap · e-kitap · e-kitap kullanımı

Abstract

The purpose of this survey study is to determine the electronic book usage and preferences of Turkish lecturers. A questionnaire prepared by Neiman Library was used as a data collection instrument. The questionnaire, which was adapted into Turkish by making validity and reliability studies, was sent by e-mail to lecturers working in different universities in Turkey. Generalizable results were gained after analyzing the data obtained from valid responses. E-books are ranked third (74.8%) among electronic resources used by lecturers use and they are mostly used for research purposes. The preferred method of accessing e-books is via search-engines such as Google. Most of the lecturers stated that they would prefer reading a book in printed form, if given the option. What comes to the forefront in e-book reading preference is that lecturers read materials both from a monitor and in printed form (a combination of both media).

Özet

Bu anket çalışmasının amacı Türk öğretim üyelerinin elektronik kitap kullanma durum ve tercihlerini belirlemektir. Veri toplama aracı olarak Neiman Library tarafından hazırlanan anket formu kullanılmıştır. Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları yapılarak Türkçe'ye uyarlanan anket formu Türkiye'nin farklı üniversitelerinde görev yapan öğretim üyelerine e-posta yoluyla gönderilmiştir. Verilerin analiz edilmesi ile genellenebilir sonuçlara ulaşılmıştır. E-kitaplar öğretim üyelerinin kullandığı elektronik kaynaklar içinde %74,8 oranıyla üçüncü sırada yer almaktadır. E-kitaplara erişimde en çok tercih edilen yol Google vb. arama motorlarıdır. Öğretim üyelerinin çoğunluğu kendilerine seçme şansı verilmesi halinde bir kitabı basılı formda okumayı tercih edeceği yönünde görüş bildirmiştir. E-kitap okuma tercihi içinde en öne çıkan ise hem ekrandan hem de basılı olarak okumak şeklindedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNGÖZ, S. (2013). Türk Öğretim Üyelerinin Elektronik Kitap Kullanim Durum ve Tercihleri. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 33–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/67986

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abdullah, N. & Gibb, F. (2008). Students’ Attitudes towards e-books in a Scottish Higher Education Institute: Part 2 Analysis of e-book usage. Library Review, 57(9) 676–689.
  2. Abram, S. (2004). eBooks: Rumors of our death greatly exaggerated, Information Outlook, 8(2), 14–16.
  3. Armstrong, C. & Lonsdale, R. (2010). E-book use by academic staff and students in UK universities: Focus Group Report, Retrieved September 23, 2010, from http://www.jiscebooksproject.org/wp-content/JC-IAL_AcademiceBookUseFinal_ Report_v1-01.pdf Anuradha, K. T. & Usha, H. S. (2006). Use of e-books in an academic and research environment: A case study from the Indian Institute of Science Program. Electronic Library and Information Systems, 40(1), 48–62.
  4. Ardito, S. (2000). Electronic books: To “e” or not to “e”; that is the question. Searcher, 8(4), 1– Armatas, C., Holt, D. & Rice, M. (2003). Impacts of online-supported resource-based learning environment: Does one size fit all? Distance Education, 24(2), 141–158.
  5. Bailey, T.P. (2006). Electronic book usage at a master’s level I university: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(1), 52–59.
  6. Bierman, J., Ortega, L. & Rupp-Serrano, K. (2010). E-book usage in pure and applied sciences. Science & Technology Libraries, 29, 69–91.
  7. Brewer, S. & Milam, P. (2006). SLJ's Technology Survey 2006: New technologies—like blogs and wikis—are taking their place in the school media center. School Library Journal, 52(6), 45–49.
  8. Buzzetto-More, N., Sweat-Guy, R. & Elobaid, M. (2007). Reading in a digital age: E-books are students ready for this learning object? Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2003).
  9. Anket geliştirme, Retrieved April 18, 2011, from http://www.tebd.gazi.edu.tr/arsiv/2005_cilt3/sayi_2/133-151.pdf.
  10. Camacho, L. & Spackman, A. (2011). Transitioning to e-books: Usage and attitudes among business faculty. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 16(1), 33–45
  11. Christianson, M. & Aucoin, M. (2005). Electronic or print books: Which are used? Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 29, 71–81.
  12. Chu, H. (2003). Electronic books: Viewpoints from users and potential users. Library Hi Tech 21(3), 340–346.
  13. Erol, A. (2009). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Elektronik Yayıncılık. Thesis (PhD), Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi.
  14. Fernandez, M., 2003. A usage comparison for print and electronic books at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. Thesis (PhD) University of North Carolina.