SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama / 2013 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

BÖTE Nedir? Nasıl Tanımlanır? Okul Müzesiyle Başlayan Serüvenden İnsan Performans Teknolojilerine Uzanan Yolculuk

Hasan ÇAKIR
Ayça ÇEBİ
Seher ÖZCAN
Pages
102–111
Publication Date
2013-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, information concerning performance technologies, originated from educational technologies and later covered all, were given and job opportunities for a graduate of CEIT were briefly discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This letter is an attempt to introduce the department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology (CEIT) and to describe the concepts in the field and relations among them.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Technologies which are fundamental constituents of the field, influential relations of the learning approaches to the field and instructional systems development were elaborated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, information concerning performance technologies, originated from educational technologies and later covered all, were given and job opportunities for a graduate of CEIT were briefly discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:BÖTE · öğretim teknolojisi · performans teknolojisi

Abstract

This letter is an attempt to introduce the department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology (CEIT) and to describe the concepts in the field and relations among them. To this end, educational and instructional technology, basic concepts in the field, were explained initially. Technologies which are fundamental constituents of the field, influential relations of the learning approaches to the field and instructional systems development were elaborated. Finally, information concerning performance technologies, originated from educational technologies and later covered all, were given and job opportunities for a graduate of CEIT were briefly discussed.

Özet

Bu mektupta Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü (BÖTE)'nü tanıtmak, alandaki kavramları ve bu kavramlar arasındaki ilişkiler açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu amaçla öncelikle alandaki temel kavramlar olan eğitim ve öğretim teknolojisi kavramlarının tanımlarına yer verilmiştir. Ayrıca alanın temel bileşenleri olan teknolojilerine, öğrenme yaklaşımlarının alana etkilerine ve öğretim sistemleri geliştirme kavramlarına da değinilmiştir. Çalışmada son olarak eğitim teknolojilerinden doğan ancak daha sonra onu da kapsayan performans teknolojileri hakkında bilgi verilmiş ve bir BÖTE mezunun kendine hangi alanlarda yer bulabileceği kısaca açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKIR, H., ÇEBİ, A., ÖZCAN, S. (2013). BÖTE Nedir? Nasıl Tanımlanır? Okul Müzesiyle Başlayan Serüvenden İnsan Performans Teknolojilerine Uzanan Yolculuk. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 102–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/67983

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Alessi, S. M., ve Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon. Driscoll, M. P. (2005a). Radical behaviorism. In Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.) (pp. 29-69).
  2. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Driscoll, M. P. (2005b). Cognitive information processing. In Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.) (pp. 71-110).
  3. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Driscoll, M. P. (2005c). Constructivism. In Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.) (pp. 384-410).
  4. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Driscoll, M. P. (2007). Psychological foundations of instructional design. In R. A. Reiser (Ed.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed.) (pp. 36-44).
  5. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Duffy, T. M., ve Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the Design and Delivery of Instruction. In David H. Jonassen (Ed.). Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Macmillan. Ertmer, P. A., ve Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50-72.
  6. Gagne, R.M., Wager, W.W., Golas, K.G., ve Keller, J.M. (2005). Principles of instructional design. Toronto, ON: Thomson Wadsworth. Januszewski, A., ve Persichitte, K. A. (2008). A history of the AECT’s definitions of educational technology. In A. Januszewski& M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology (pp. 259-282). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Jonassen, D. H. (1990). Toward a constructivist view of instructional design. Educational Technology, 30(10), 32-34.
  7. Molenda, M., Pershing, J.A., ve Reigeluth, C.M. (1996). Designing instructional systems. In Robert Craig (Ed.), The ASTD Training and Development Handbook, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., ve Kemp J. E. (2004). Designing effective instruction(4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Pershing, J. (2006). Human performance technology fundamentals. In J. A. Pershing (Ed.) (2006), Handbook of human performance technology (3rd ed.) (pp. 5-34). San Francisco: Pfeiffer. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional design theory and how is it changing? In C. M. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional-design theories and models volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory, (pp. 1-29).
  8. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional desi