SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3s

A review of the use of artificial intelligence in orthodontics

Serdar AKDENİZ
Muhammet Emir TOSUN
Pages
157–162
Publication Date
2021-05-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Despite its shortcomings, artificial intelligence is considered to have an integral part of orthodontic practice in the near future.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The clinical use of artificial intelligence technology in orthodontics has increased significantly in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Artificial intelligence can be utilized in almost every part of orthodontic workflow.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Despite its shortcomings, artificial intelligence is considered to have an integral part of orthodontic practice in the near future.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Artificial intelligence · machine learning · orthodontics

Abstract

The clinical use of artificial intelligence technology in orthodontics has increased significantly in recent years. Artificial intelligence can be utilized in almost every part of orthodontic workflow. It is an important decision making aid as well as a tool for building more efficient treatment mechanics. The use of artificial intelligence reduces costs, speeds up the diagnosis and treatment process and reduces or even eliminates the need for manpower. This review article evaluates the current literature on artificial intelligence and machine learning in the field of orthodontics. The areas that the artificial intelligence is still lacking were also discussed in detail. Despite its shortcomings, artificial intelligence is considered to have an integral part of orthodontic practice in the near future.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDENİZ, S., TOSUN, M. E. (2021). A review of the use of artificial intelligence in orthodontics. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3s, 157–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/677942

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akçam, M. O., & Takada, K., 2002. Fuzzy modelling for selecting headgear types. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 24(1), 99–106.
  2. Auconi, P., Caldarelli, G., Scala, A., Ierardo, G., & Polimeni, A., 2011. A network approach to orthodontic diagnosis. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research, 14(4), 189–197.
  3. Auconi, P., Scazzocchio, M., Cozza, P., McNamara Jr, J. A., & Franchi, L., 2015. Prediction of Class III treatment outcomes through orthodontic data mining. European Journal of Orthodontics, 37(3), 257–267.
  4. Banumathi, A., Raju, S., & Abhaikumar, V., 2011. Diagnosis of dental deformities in cephalometry images using support vector machine. Journal of Medical Systems, 35(1), 113–119.
  5. Buschang, P. H., Ross, M., Shaw, S. G., Crosby, D., & Campbell, P. M., 2014. Predicted and actual end-of-treatment occlusion produced with aligner therapy. The Angle Orthodontist, 85(5), 723–727. https://doi.org/10.2319/043014-311.1
  6. Faber, J., Faber, C., & Faber, P., 2019. Artificial intelligence in orthodontics. APOS Trends in Orthodontics, 9(4), 201–205.
  7. Faltin, R. M., de Almeida, M. A. A., Kessner, C. A., & Faltin, K. J., 2003. Efficiency, three-dimensional planning and prediction of the orthodontic treatment with the Invisalign® System: case report. R Clín Ortodon Dental Press, 2(2), 61–71.
  8. Grünheid, T., Loh, C., & Larson, B. E., 2017. How accurate is Invisalign in nonextraction cases? Are predicted tooth positions achieved? The Angle Orthodontist, 87(6), 809–815.
  9. Gupta, A., Kharbanda, O. P., Sardana, V., Balachandran, R., & Sardana, H. K., 2015. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 10(11), 1737–1752. Hägg, U., & Taranger, J., 1980. Menarche and voice change as indicators of the pubertal growth spurt. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 38(3), 179–186. Hägg, U., & Taranger, J., 1982. Maturation indicators and the pubertal growth spurt. American Journal of Orthodontics, 82(4), 299–309.
  10. Harrar, H., Myers, S., & Ghanem, A. M., 2018. Art or Science? An evidence-based approach to human facial beauty a quantitative analysis towards an informed clinical aesthetic practice. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 42(1), 137–146.
  11. Hutton, T. J., Cunningham, S., & Hammond, P., 2000. An evaluation of active shape models for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 22(5), 499–508.
  12. Iglovikov, V. I., Rakhlin, A., Kalinin, A. A., &