Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

THE MEDIATING ROLE OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOR

ÇALIŞANLARIN ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET ALGILARI İLE ÜRETKENLİK KARŞITI İŞ DAVRANIŞLARI ETKİLEŞİMİNDE POZİTİF VE NEGATİF DUYGUSALLIĞIN ARACILIK ETKİSİ

Pages
215–234
Publication Date
2015-11-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it was founded that all dimensions of perceived organizational justice except distributive justice affects counterproductive work behavior negatively and distributive justice affects negative affectivity negatively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Counterproductive work behaviors are among the behaviors that harms the organizations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data collected from the employees of 9 companies in Çorum.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it was founded that all dimensions of perceived organizational justice except distributive justice affects counterproductive work behavior negatively and distributive justice affects negative affectivity negatively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Algılanan Örgütsel Adalet · Pozitif ve Negatif Duygusallık · Perceived Organizational Justice

Abstract

Counterproductive work behaviors are among the behaviors that harms the organizations. In this study organizational justice and positive negative affectivity is analyzed as predictors of counterproductive work behavior. Data collected from the employees of 9 companies in Çorum. It was intended to diversify the sample by selecting employees from different sectors. Data were evaluated by correlation and regression analyses. As a result, it was founded that all dimensions of perceived organizational justice except distributive justice affects counterproductive work behavior negatively and distributive justice affects negative affectivity negatively. Also it was determined that negative affectivity has an enhancing role on counterproductive work behavior.Keywords: Perceived Organizational Justice, Positive and Negative Affectivity, Counterproductive Work Behavior.

Özet

Üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışları örgüte zarar veren davranışlar arasındadır. Bu çalışmada üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışlarının belirleyicileri olarak örgütsel adalet ile pozitif ve negatif duygusallıkları incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklemi olarak Çorum’da 9 işletmenin çalışanları belirlenmiştir. İşletmeler farklı sektörlerden seçilerek örneklemin çeşitlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Veriler korelasyon ve regresyon analizleri kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, dağıtım adaleti dışında diğer algılanan örgütsel adalet boyutlarının üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışlarını negatif yönde etkilediği, dağıtım adaletinin ise negatif duygusallığı negatif yönde etkilediği sonuçlarına ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca negatif duygusallığın üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışlarını artırıcı bir rol oynadığı tespit edilmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Algılanan Örgütsel Adalet, Pozitif ve Negatif Duygusallık, Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışları.

🔖

Cite This Article

POLATCI, S., ÖZÇALIK, F. (2015). THE MEDIATING ROLE OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOR. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 215–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/67713

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Anderson, L. M. ve Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24 (3): 452-471.
  2. Baron, R. A. ve Neuman, J. H. (1996). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and potential causes. Aggressive Behavior, 22 (3): 161-173.
  3. Bayram, N., Gürsakal, N. ve Bilgel, N. (2009). Counterproductive work behavior among white-collar employees: A study from Turkey. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17 (2): 180-188.
  4. Bennett, R. J. ve Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (3): 349-360.
  5. Beugre, C. D. (2005). Reacting aggressively to injustice at work: A cognitive stage model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20 (2): 291-301.
  6. Bies, R. ve Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria for fairness. B. Sheppard (Ed.) Research on negotiation in organizations: İçinde 43-59.
  7. Greenwich, Ct: Jai Press.
  8. Bolton, L., R., Harvey, R. D., Grawitch, M. J. ve Barber, L. K. (2012). Counterproductive work behaviors in response to emotional exhaustion: A moderated mediational approach. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 28 (3): 222-233.
  9. Bruk-Lee, V. ve Spector, P. E. (2006). The social stressors-counterproductive work behaviors link: Are conflicts with supervisors and coworkers the same? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11 (2): 145-156.
  10. Byrne, Z. S. ve Cropanzano, R. (2001). When it's time to stop writing policies: An inquiry into procedural injustice. Human Resource Management Review, 11 (1): 31-54. doi: 10.1016/S1053-4822(00)00039-5.
  11. Chen, P. Y. ve Spector, P. E. (1992). Relationships of work stressors with aggression, withdrawal, theft and substance use: An exploratory study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65 (3): 177-184.
  12. Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T. ve Turan, N. (2013). Predicting counterproductive work behavior from guilt proneness. Journal of Business Ethics, 114 (1): 45-53.
  13. Dalal, R. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (6): 1241-1255.
  14. Doğan, Y. ve Özdevecioğlu, M. (2009). Pozitif ve negatif duygusallığın çalışanların performansları üzerindeki etkisi. SÜ İİBF Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9 (18): 165-190.
  15. Folger, R. ve Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organiza