Journals / Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Healthcare Demand Procrastination Scale: Development and Validation Study

Pages
617–626
Publication Date
2022-05-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the behavior of individuals with a certain disease about health procrastination behavior for health services can also be examined through the developed scale.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Maintaining a healthy life is the right of every individual.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Through this study, it was aimed to develop a measurement tool in order to determine the procrastination behavior for health services demand among the individuals at the age of 18 and over.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the behavior of individuals with a certain disease about health procrastination behavior for health services can also be examined through the developed scale.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Health · health procrastination behavior · health seeking behaviors

Abstract

Purpose: Maintaining a healthy life is the right of every individual. The important matter at this point is accepting early intervention without delaying healthcare demand and taking action for this intervention. Through this study, it was aimed to develop a measurement tool in order to determine the procrastination behavior for health services demand among the individuals at the age of 18 and over. Methods: In the study, a questionnaire form which consists of the demographic variables (gender, age, marital status, learning status, status of chronic diseases, number of applications to the physician, status of access to physician, and health assurance) and informed consent was employed. Healthcare Demand Procrastination Scale (HDPS) was employed as well as the Health Seeking Behavior Scale (HSBS) for the validity of criteria. The findings obtained from the study were evaluated through the programs of SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) and AMOS. Results: No significant difference was found between the scores obtained through Kendall’s test which was conducted in order to test the content validity of the scale. In order to examine the structure validation of the scale, explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis were performed and as a result of the analysis, values of goodness of fit were found normal and acceptable. Finally, HSBS was employed to ensure the criteria validity of the scale. A positive relationship was found between procrastination behavior of healthcare demand and traditional behavior of health seeking while there was a negative relationship with professional health seeking behavior. In the Pearson correlation coefficient analysis which shows the compatibility of the average test-retest scores of the draft scale, a statistically significant positive relationship was observed between two measurements. Conclusions: As a result of the research, a scale which measures the healthcare demand procrastination behavior in Turkey was obtained. In addition, the behavior of individuals with a certain disease about health procrastination behavior for health services can also be examined through the developed scale.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖYLER, S., UYAR, S., KIRAÇ, R., YILMAZ, G., KIRAÇ, F. Ç. (2022). Healthcare Demand Procrastination Scale: Development and Validation Study. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 617–626. https://ajindex.com/articles/677019

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ferrari JR, Tice DM. Procrastination as a self-handicap for men and women: A task-avoidance strategy in a laboratory setting. Journal of Research in Personality 2000
  2. 73–83. ttps://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2261 2. Ferrari JR. Compulsive procrastination: some self-reported characteristics. Psychological Reports 1991
  3. 68, 455–458. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1991.68.2.455 3. Ferrari JR, Johnson JH, McCown WG editors. Procrastination, and task avoidance: Theory, research, and treatment. New York: Plenum
  4. Sirois FM, Melia-Gordon ML, Pychyl TA. ‘‘I’ll look after my health, later’’: an investigation of procrastination and health. Personality and Individual Differences 2003
  5. 35(5): 1167–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00326-4 5. Sirois FM, Pychyl TA. Academic procrastination: Costs to health and well-being. In Paper presented at the 110th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Chicago: Illinois
  6. Tice DM, Baumeister RF. Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress, and health: The costs and benefits of dawdling. Psychological Science 1997: 8, 454–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00460.x 7. Sirois FM. Procrastination and counterfactual thinking: avoiding what might have been. British Journal of Social Psychology 2004a
  7. 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1348/0144666041501660 8. Sirois FM. Procrastination and intentions to perform health behaviors: the role of self-efficacy and the consideration of future consequences. Personality and Individual Differences 2004b
  8. 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.08.005 9. Sirois FM. ‘‘I’ll look after my health, later’’: A replication and extension of the procrastination–health model with community-dwelling adults. Elsevier, Personality and Individual Differences 2007
  9. 43 (2007): 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.003 10. Tengilimoğlu D. Işık O. Akbolat M. Sağlık İşletmeleri Yönetimi 7.baskı. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık: 2015.7. Basım. 11. Mohammadi Zeidi I, Pakpour Hajiagha A, Mohammadi Zeidi B. Reliability and validity of persian version of the health-promoting lifestyle profile. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences 2012
  10. 21(1): 102-113. 12. Kroese FM, de Ridder DT. Health behaviour procrastination: a novel reasoned route towards selfregulatory failure. Health Psychol Rev 2016
  11. 10(3):313- 325. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1116019 13. Basirimoghadam M, Rafii F, Ebadi A. At