Journals / Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

A Comparison of Left and Right Leg Static Balance Parameters in Young Handball Players

Pages
365–373
Publication Date
2022-05-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The results showed that when mean speed of left and right leg forward-backward velocity of the athletes was analysed, a significant difference was found in favour of the right leg (p≤0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare left and right leg balance parameters in young female handball players.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: 13 athletes (age: 15.07±0.19 years, height: 162.23±5.70 cm, weight: 57.38±4.39 kg, BMI 21.92±0.23 kg/m², training age: 4.23±1.36 years) volunteered for the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The results showed that when mean speed of left and right leg forward-backward velocity of the athletes was analysed, a significant difference was found in favour of the right leg (p≤0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Balance · handball · performance

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare left and right leg balance parameters in young female handball players. Methods: 13 athletes (age: 15.07±0.19 years, height: 162.23±5.70 cm, weight: 57.38±4.39 kg, BMI 21.92±0.23 kg/m², training age: 4.23±1.36 years) volunteered for the study. Normality test of the data was done using Shapiro-Wilk test, and variation homogeneity was tested using Levene’s Test of Homogeneity of Variance. When the data showed non-parametric characteristics, Mann Whitney U-Test was used; when it was parametric, Independent Sample Test was used. SPSS 17 Software was used for statistical analysis, and the significance was determined as p≤0.05. Results: The results showed that when mean speed of left and right leg forward-backward velocity of the athletes was analysed, a significant difference was found in favour of the right leg (p≤0.05). Furthermore, a significant difference was found in favour of the right leg between means of the left and right leg perimeter of the athletes (p≤0.05). However, there found no difference between means of the left and right leg lateral velocity and ellipsis area of the athletes (p≥0.05). Conclusion: These results may show that due to the training ages of the athletes (4 years), branches of the athletes did not affect the results and their improvement were still in progress. It could also be due to the dominant leg of all the athletes being their right leg and/or due to the differences in their leg strength. The most important limitation of this study could be the fact that leg strength values were not included in the study. Generally, in handball, when the dominant arm of the athlete is their right, the leg at the opposite side is the one used for jumping. Nevertheless, in individual leg balance tests done with both legs, it is expected there be no difference between the values. For these differences not to cause any sport injuries and not to negatively affect the technical move performances, it is advised that coaches have lower extremity strength and balance exercises symmetrically done.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAMÇI, H., KARADENIZLI, Z. İ., ZİLELİ, R. (2022). A Comparison of Left and Right Leg Static Balance Parameters in Young Handball Players. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 365–373. https://ajindex.com/articles/676996

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Emery CA, Cassidy JD, Klassen TP, Rosychuk R J, & Rowe BH. Effectiveness of a home-based balance-training program in reducing sports-related injuries among healthy adolescents: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Cmaj. 2005; 172(6); 749-754
  2. Radebold A, Cholewicki J, Polzhofer GK & Greene HS. Impaired postural control of the lumbar spine is associated with delayed muscle response times in patients with chronic idiopathic low back pain. Spine Journal. 2001; 26(7): 724-730
  3. Harringe ML, Halvorsen K, Renström P & Werner S. Postural control measured as the center of pressure excursion in young female gymnasts with low back pain or lower extremity injury. Gait & posture. 2008; 28(1): 38-45
  4. Erkmen N, Suveren S, Göktepe AS, & Yazıcıoğlu K. Farkli branşlardaki sporcuların denge performanslarının karşılaştırılması. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2007: 5(3); 115-122
  5. Suveren Erdoğan C. Okul öncesi eğitim alan çocuklarda denge ve koordinasyon çalışmalarının bazı motorik özellikler üzerine etkisi. Ankara: Gazi Publising House: 2018
  6. Massion J. Postural control system. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 1994; 4(6): 877-887
  7. Şimşek D & Ertan H. Postural kontrol ve spor: spor branşlarına yönelik postural sensör-motor stratejiler ve postural salınım. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2011; 9(3): 81-90
  8. Gardner EP, Martin JH & Jessell TM. Chapter 22: The bodily senses. Principles of Neural Science. 4th. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2000; 430-449 9. Ross SE & Guskiewicz KM. Examination of static and dynamic postural stability in individuals with functionally stable and unstable ankles. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 2004; 14(6): 332-338
  9. Deliagina TG, Zelenin PV, Beloozerova IN, & Orlovsky GN. Nervous mechanisms controlling body posture. Physiology & behavior. 2007; 92(1-2): 148-154
  10. Kejonen P. Body movements during postural stabilization. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis) University of Oulu, Oulu. Finland: 2002
  11. Paillard T, Noe F, Riviere T, Marion V, Montaya R & Dupui P. Postural performance and strategy in the unipedal stance of soccer players at different levels of competition. Journal of Athletic Training. 2006; 41(2): 172-176
  12. De Oliveira CB, de Medeiros ÍRT, Ferreira NA, Greters ME, & Conforto AB. Balance control in hemiparetic stroke patients: main tools for evaluation. Journal of rehabilitation research & development. 2008; 45(8): 1215-1226
  13. İnal HS. Spor Biyomekaniği Temel Prensipler. Ank