Journals / İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Network Governance: A Theoretical Study in the Context of City Management

Ağ Yönetişimi: Kent Yönetimi Bağlamında Teorik Bir İnceleme

Pages
249–267
Publication Date
2022-04-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In subject study, It is understood that network governance model, without neglecting its finiteness and criticisms, by its distinctive feature with regard to structure, operation and characteristic, presents important occasions to manage complex problems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The complexity of the problems faced by public arena brings up formations reflecting cooperation among organizations outside of the classical hierarchical organizations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, ıt seems that different collaborations appeared between formal and informal organizations and they are conceptualized in different ways.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In subject study, It is understood that network governance model, without neglecting its finiteness and criticisms, by its distinctive feature with regard to structure, operation and characteristic, presents important occasions to manage complex problems.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Karmaşık Sorunlar · Aktörler · İş Birliği

Abstract

The complexity of the problems faced by public arena brings up formations reflecting cooperation among organizations outside of the classical hierarchical organizations. In this context, ıt seems that different collaborations appeared between formal and informal organizations and they are conceptualized in different ways. One of the organizations came up at this point get its riposte by the concept of “network governance”. At this study, network governance is embraced as an organization model and became a subject of an analysis at a theoretical level in city management. Because the cities are the places that subject complex problems are realized first by social, economic and environmental aspects. In subject study, It is understood that network governance model, without neglecting its finiteness and criticisms, by its distinctive feature with regard to structure, operation and characteristic, presents important occasions to manage complex problems.

Özet

Kamusal açıdan karşılaşılan sorunların karmaşıklığı, klasik hiyerarşik örgütlenmelerin dışında, örgütler arasında iş birliklerini yansıtan oluşumları gündeme getirmektedir. Bu bağlamda biçimsel ve biçimsel olmayan örgütler arasında farklı iş birlikleri ortaya çıkmakta ve farklı şekillerde kavramsallaştırıldığı görülmektedir. Bu noktada gündeme gelen örgütlenmelerden biri de “ağ yönetişimi” kavramı ile karşılık bulmaktadır. Bu çalışmada bir örgütlenme modeli olarak ele alınan ağ yönetişimi, kent yönetimi bağlamında teorik düzeyde inceleme konusu yapılmaktadır. Çünkü kentler, günümüz açısından adı geçen karmaşık sorunların; sosyal, ekonomik ve çevresel boyutlarıyla birinci derecede gerçekleştiği mekânlardır. Yapılan incelemede, sahip olduğu sınırlılıklar ve getirilen eleştiriler ihmal edilmeden, ağ yönetişimi modelinin, yapı, işleyiş ve karakteristik açıdan ayırıcı özellikleriyle, karmaşık sorunların yönetiminde önemli fırsatlar sunduğu anlaşılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MEMİŞ, L. (2022). Network Governance: A Theoretical Study in the Context of City Management. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 249–267. https://ajindex.com/articles/676103

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. AARS, J., FIMREITE, A. L. (2005). Local government and governance in Norway: Stretched accountability in network politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28, 3, 239-256. AARSÆTHER, N., NYSETH, T., BJORNA, H. (2011). Two networks, one city: Democracy and governance networks in urban transformation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18, 3, 306–320.
  2. ACAR, M. (2004). Örgüsel yönetim. Ankara:
  3. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. AGRANOFF, R., MCGUIRE, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11-3, 295-326.
  4. AGRANOFF, R., MCGUIRE, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC.: Goorgetown University Press.
  5. AGRANOFF, R. (2007). Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations, Washington, DC.: Georgetown University Press.
  6. AGRANOFF, R. (2012). Collaborating to manage: A primer for the public sector, Washington, DC.: Georgetown University Press.
  7. ALFORD, J., O’FLYNN, J. (2012). Rethinking public service delivery: Managing with external providers. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ANSELL, C. (2000). The networked polity: Regional development in western Europe, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administaratin and Institutions, 13, 3, 303-333.
  8. ATEŞ ÖZALP, S. (2015). Turizm idaresinde ağ yönetişim modeli: Türkiye örneği (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara:
  9. ODTÜ SBE. AYGÜL, C. (2006). Şebeke kuramlarına eleştirel bir yaklaşım. Memleket SiyasetYönetim, 1, 141-153.
  10. BARNES, M., SKELCHER, C., BEIRENS, H., DALZIEL, R., JEFFARES, S., WILSON, L. (2008). Designing citizen-centred governance. Erişim tarihi: 15.08.2013, http://www.jrf.org.uk/system/files/2205-governance-citizens-engagement.pdf
  11. BEKKERS, V. (2011). Linking innovation to the public sector: Contexts, concepts and challenges. İç. Victor Bekkers, Jurian Edelenbos ve Bram Steijn (Eds.), Innovation in the public sector linking capacity and leadership (3-32).
  12. Palgrave Macmillan. BERRY, F. S., BROWER, R. S., CHOI, S. O., GOA, W. X., JANG, H., KWON, M., WORD, J. (2004). Three traditions of network research: What the public management research agenda can learn from other research communities. Public Administration Review, 64, 5, 539–552.
  13. BEVIR, M., RHODES, R. A. W. (2006). Decentred theory, change and network governance. UC Berkeley: UC Berkeley Previously Published Works. BEVIR, M. (2009). Key concepts in governance. California: Sage Publications. BOGASON, P., TOONEN, T. A. J. (1998). In