Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

CONTENT ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENT-BEHAVIOR RESEARCHES WITH AN ECOLOGICAL APPROACH IN TERMS OF SUBJECTS AND TECHNIQUES

EKOLOJİK YAKLAŞIMLI ÇEVRE-DAVRANIŞ ARAŞTIRMALARININ KONULAR VE TEKNİKLER AÇISINDAN İÇERİK ANALİZİ

Pages
805–831
Publication Date
2019-09-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the research subjects dealt with in these studies have a rich variety, and the techniques are also various and flexible.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ecological approach and ecological psychology as a branch of environmental psychology which is gaining an increasing importance in the field of environmental design till 1960’s, deal human and environment as parts of a whole and accept their interrelatedness by adopting ecology science and its basic principles. “Behavior Setting Theory” and “Affordance Theory” are examples of ecological approach to human-environment relationship.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study environment and behavior studies with an ecological approach conducted in Turkey and other parts of the world were examined in terms of their research subjects and techniques.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the research subjects dealt with in these studies have a rich variety, and the techniques are also various and flexible.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mekânsal Tasarım · İnsan-Çevre İlişkisi · Ekolojik Yaklaşımlar

Abstract

Ecological approach and ecological psychology as a branch of environmental psychology which is gaining an increasing importance in the field of environmental design till 1960’s, deal human and environment as parts of a whole and accept their interrelatedness by adopting ecology science and its basic principles. “Behavior Setting Theory” and “Affordance Theory” are examples of ecological approach to human-environment relationship. In this study environment and behavior studies with an ecological approach conducted in Turkey and other parts of the world were examined in terms of their research subjects and techniques. The results showed that the research subjects dealt with in these studies have a rich variety, and the techniques are also various and flexible. Also it was determined that studies adopted ecological approach enables both gathering numeric data and commenting on social and cultural dimensions at the same time.

Özet

Mekânsal tasarım alanında 1960’lı yıllardan itibaren önem kazanmaya başlayan çevresel psikolojinin bir dalı olan ekolojik psikoloji ya da yaklaşımlar ekoloji biliminden ve temel ilkelerinden faydalanarak insan ve çevresi arasındaki koparılamaz bağdan, her ikisini bir bütünün parçaları olarak ele almaktan bahseder. Araştırmalarda giderek yaygınlaşan Davranış Konumu Kuramı ve Olanaklılık Kuramı ekolojik yaklaşıma örnek verilebilir. Türkiye’de ve dünyada yapılmış olan ekolojik yaklaşımlı çevre-davranış araştırmalarının hangi konuları hangi tekniklerle ele aldığı bu çalışmada incelenmiştir. Sonuçlar, bu çalışmalarda ele alınan konuların çok çeşitli olduğunu ve kullanılan tekniklerin de çeşitlilik ve esneklik sergilediğini ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca ekolojik yaklaşımların araştırmacılara hem sayısal veriler elde etme imkânı sağlarken hem de toplumsal, sosyal, kültürel boyutlarda da yorum yapabilme imkânı sağladığını ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUMCU, S., DÜZENLİ, T., EREN, E. T. (2019). CONTENT ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENT-BEHAVIOR RESEARCHES WITH AN ECOLOGICAL APPROACH IN TERMS OF SUBJECTS AND TECHNIQUES. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 805–831. https://ajindex.com/articles/67561

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aladwani, A. M. (2017). Compatible quality of social media content: conceptualization, measurement, and affordances. International Journal of Information Management, 37(6), 576–582.
  2. Albayrak, G. E. (2016). Aktarma merkezlerinde mekânsal davranışlar: Üsküdar örneği. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi,
  3. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  4. Alparslan Kardeş, G. (2016). Davranış-mekân uyumu: Bilişsel esneklik düzeyleri farklı öğrencilere göre, okul ortamında olanaklılıkların (affordances) incelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi,
  5. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. Bærentsen, K. B. & Trettvik, J. (2002). An activity theory approach to affordance. Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction içinde (ss. 51-60).
  6. Arhus, Denmark: ACM. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology; concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. California, Stanford: Stanford University Pres. Barker, R. G. (1976). On the nature of the environment. H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson, L. G. Rivlin (Der.), Environmental psychology; people and their physical settings içinde (ss. 12-26).
  7. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Second Edition.
  8. Bayrakçı, O. (2003). The theory of categorization in the determination of product semantic profile and an example on its use in product design. Tasarım+Kuram, 2(3), 67-79.
  9. Blanchard, A. L. (2004). Virtual behavior settings: An application of behavior setting theories to virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(2). http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1083- 6101.2004.tb00285.x Bechtel, R. B. (1982). Contributions of ecological psychology to the evaluation of environments. International Review of Applied Psychology, 31, 153-167.
  10. Bechtel, R. B. (1987).
  11. Ecological psychology. R. B. Bechtel, R. W. Marans, W. Michelson (Der.), Methods in environmental and behavioral research içinde (ss.191-215). Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc. Bernasco, W., Bruinsma, G. JN., Pauwels, L. JR. & Weerman, F. M. (2013). Adolescent delinquency and diversity in behavior settings. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 46(3), 357–378.
  12. Berry, J. W. (1976). Ecological and cultural factors in spatial perceptual development. H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson, L. G. Rivlin (Der.), Environmental psychology; people and their physical settings içinde (ss.125-133).
  13. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Second Edition.
  14. Caplan, J. M., Kennedy, L. W., B