Journals / International Journal of Secondary Metabolite / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

A Study on the Possible Mutagenicity of Different Types of Plant Growth Regulators

Pages
425–435
Publication Date
2021-12-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, a 2500 µg/plate dose of Kinetin was to be found mutagenic on the strain TA 98 in the presence and in the absence of S9 enzyme, and on the strain TA 100 in the absence of the S9 enzyme.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is known that most chemicals, which have been increasingly used since ancient times, have carcinogenic and mutagenic effects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Experiments were performed in the presence (+ S9) or absence (-S9) of metabolic activation enzymes using TA 98 and TA 100 strains of Salmonella typhimurium. 5 non-cytotoxic doses for each test substance were investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, a 2500 µg/plate dose of Kinetin was to be found mutagenic on the strain TA 98 in the presence and in the absence of S9 enzyme, and on the strain TA 100 in the absence of the S9 enzyme.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ames test 1 · Mutagenicity 2 · Plant growth regulators 3

Abstract

It is known that most chemicals, which have been increasingly used since ancient times, have carcinogenic and mutagenic effects. As an alternative to these chemicals, natural compounds, such as plant growth regulators (PGRs) have been used. However, are the PGRs used to obtain efficient plants in agriculture as harmless as it is thought today when it is essential to access natural foods in the food and agriculture sectors? Therefore, this study investigates the mutagenic activity of two plant growth regulators (Kinetin, Chlormequat chloride (CCC)) using the Ames/Salmonella short-time test system. Experiments were performed in the presence (+ S9) or absence (-S9) of metabolic activation enzymes using TA 98 and TA 100 strains of Salmonella typhimurium. 5 non-cytotoxic doses for each test substance were investigated. The results were evaluated by comparing them with spontaneous control plates. According to the results, a 2500 µg/plate dose of Kinetin was to be found mutagenic on the strain TA 98 in the presence and in the absence of S9 enzyme, and on the strain TA 100 in the absence of the S9 enzyme. The other substance CCC did not cause mutagenic effects on the bacterial strains.

Özet

It is known that most chemicals, which have been increasingly used since ancient times, have carcinogenic and mutagenic effects. As an alternative to these chemicals, natural compounds, such as plant growth regulators (PGRs) have been used. However, are the PGRs used to obtain efficient plants in agriculture as harmless as it is thought today when it is essential to access natural foods in the food and agriculture sectors? Therefore, this study investigates the mutagenic activity of two plant growth regulators (Kinetin, Chlormequat chloride (CCC)) using the Ames/Salmonella short-time test system. Experiments were performed in the presence (+ S9) or absence (-S9) of metabolic activation enzymes using TA 98 and TA 100 strains of Salmonella typhimurium. 5 non-cytotoxic doses for each test substance were investigated. The results were evaluated by comparing them with spontaneous control plates. According to the results, a 2500 µg/plate dose of Kinetin was to be found mutagenic on the strain TA 98 in the presence and in the absence of S9 enzyme, and on the strain TA 100 in the absence of the S9 enzyme. The other substance CCC did not cause mutagenic effects on the bacterial strains.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAPICI, S., URAZ, G., BEYZİ, E. (2021). A Study on the Possible Mutagenicity of Different Types of Plant Growth Regulators. International Journal of Secondary Metabolite, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 425–435. https://ajindex.com/articles/672870

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akman, Y., & Darıcı, C. (1998). Bitki Fizyolojisi (Beslenme ve Gelişme Fizyolojisi) [Plant Physiology (Nutrition and Development Physiology)]. Kariyer Matbaacılık Ames, B.N., Lee, F.D., & Durston, W.E., (1973). An Improved Bacterial Test System for the Detection of Classification of Mutagens and Carcinogens. Proc. of the Nat. Acad. of Sci., 70, 782-786.
  2. Ames, B.N., (1985). Food Constituents as a Source of Mutagens, Carcinogens and Anticarcinogens, Genetic Toxicology of the Diet, proceeding of a Satellite Symposium of the Fourth International Conference on Environmental Mutagens Held in Copenhagen, Denmark, Ed. B. knudsen, 3-32.
  3. Bağcı, H., (1985). Yaz Okulu Moleküler Biyoloji Ders Notları [Summer School Molecular Biology Lecture Notes]. ODTÜ, pp 25-55.
  4. Basra, A.S., (2000). Plant Growth Regulators in Agriculture and Horticulture: Their Role and Commercial Uses. Haworth Press.
  5. Çetinkaya, A.M., & Baydan, E., (2006). Bitki Gelişim Düzenleyicilerin Zehirliliğine Genel Bir Bakış [An Overview of the Toxicity of Plant Growth Regulators]. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi, 77(4), 26-31.
  6. Dean, B.J., Brooks, T.M., Hodson–Walker, G., & Hutson, D.H. (1985). Genetic toxicology testing of 41 industrial chemicals. Mutat. Res, 153, 57-77
  7. Dökmeci, I., (1988).
  8. Toksikoloji, Akut zehirlenmelerde Tanı ve Tedavi [Toxicology, Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Poisoning]. Nobel Kitap kitabevi. EFSA (2008). Conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance chlormequat (considered variant chlormequat chlorid). EFSA Scientific Report 179. pp.1-77.
  9. Emig, M., Reinhardt, A., & Mersch Sunderman, V. (1996). A comparative study of five nitro musk compounds for genotoxicity in the SOS choromotest and Salmonella mutagenicity. Toxicol. Letter., 85, 151-156.
  10. Ennever, F.K., & Rosenkraz, H.J. (1986). Evaluating Batteries of Short-Term Genotoxicity Tests. Mutagenesis, 1, 293-298.
  11. Forman, D. & Ames, B., (1991). The Ames Test and the Causes of Cancer. Br. Med. J. Vol. 303, 428-429.
  12. Güleryüz, M. (1982). Bahçe ziraatında büyütücü ve engelleyici maddelerin kullanılması ve önemi [The use and importance of growth and inhibitory substances in horticulture]. Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınları, 279. Halloran, N., & Kasım, M.U. (2002). Meyve ve Sebzelerde Büyüme Düzenleyici Madde Kullanımı ve Kalıntı Düzeyleri [Use and Residues of plant Growth Regulators in Fruit and Vegetable Production (Turkish with English Abstract)]. Gıda, 27(5), 351-359.
  13. Harms, C.L., & Oplinger, E