SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Horticultural Studies / 2014 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

The effects of humic acid on nutrient status yield and quality of tomato

Domatesin beslenme durumu verimi ve kalite özelliklerine hümik asitin etkileri

Elif DEMİRTAŞ
Filiz ÖKTÜREN ASRİ
Nuri ARI
Pages
1–16
Publication Date
2014-07-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Fruit yield was increased by humic acid applications compared to control.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In order to increase organic matter content of soil, humic acid application is the most economic and fast method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the effects of humic acid and their dosages (0, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 L da-1) on nutritional, status of tomato and yield-quality were investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Fruit yield was increased by humic acid applications compared to control.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011-2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domates · Hümik asit · Bitki besleme

Abstract

In order to increase organic matter content of soil, humic acid application is the most economic and fast method. In this study, the effects of humic acid and their dosages (0, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 L da-1) on nutritional, status of tomato and yield-quality were investigated. During the growing period, a dose of NPK was applied through drip irrigation. The experiment was carried out according to randomized complete block design with four replications under greenhouse conditions in 2011-2013 autumn tomato growing season. In order to determine effects of humic acid, plant and leaves fruit were analyzed during the experiment. The results of analysis showed that increases of N, P, K, Fe, Cu content of tomato leaves was found important whereas Ca, Mg, Mn, Zn and B content was not important statistically. The effect of humic acid+NPK applications on fruit quality of tomato was positive. Fruit yield was increased by humic acid applications compared to control.

Özet

Tarımsal üretimde organik madde sorununun en ekonomik ve hızlı çözüm yollarından biri toprağa hümik asit uygulanmasıdır. Hümik asitler toprakta zamanla ayrışarak bitkilere yarayışlı hale gelmektedir. Bu çalışma ile farklı dozlarda (0, 4, 8, 12, 16 ve 20 L da-1) uygulanan hümik asidin domates bitkisinin beslenme durumu, verim ve kalitesi üzerine etkileri araştırılmıştır. Yetiştiricilik sezonu boyunca her sulamada tek doz NPK uygulanmıştır. Deneme sera koşullarında 2011-2013 sonbahar domates yetiştirme döneminde tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre dört tekerrürlü olarak yürütülmüştür. Hümik asit+NPK uygulamalarının etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla yaprak ve meyve örnekleri alınarak analiz edilmiştir.Analiz sonuçlarına göre domates bitkisinin N, P, K, Fe ve Cu içeriklerindeki artış istatistiksel olarak önemli bulunurken Mg, Ca, Mn, Zn ve B içeriklerindeki artış önemli bulunmamıştır. Hümik asit+NPK uygulamaları meyve kalite kriterlerini olumlu etkilerken, parsellerin verim değerlerini de kontrole göre artırmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRTAŞ, E., ASRİ, F. Ö., ARI, N. (2014). The effects of humic acid on nutrient status yield and quality of tomato. Horticultural Studies, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 1–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/671714

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akıncı, Ş. (2011). Hümik asitler, bitki büyümesi ve besleyici alımı. Marmara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(1): 46-56,
  2. İstanbul.
  3. Black, C. (1965). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Amer. Society of Agronomy Inc., Publisher,
  4. Madisson, Wisconsin;USA., 1372-1376.
  5. Bouyoucos, G.J. (1955). A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal, 4(9):434. Campbell, C.R. (2000). Reference sufficiency ranges for plant analysis in the southern region of the united states. Tomato, Greenhouse. http://www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/saaesd/scsb394.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 20 Ocak 20 Casenave de Sanfilppo, E., Argello, J. A., Abdaby G. & Orioli, G.A. (1990). Content of Auxin Inhibitor on Gibberellin-Like Substobces in Humic Acids Plant. Biologia Plantarum, 32: 346-351
  6. Cartwright, B., Tiler, K.G., Zarcinas, B.A. & Spouncer, L.R. (1983). The chemical assessment of B status of soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 21:3213 Çağlar, K.Ö. (1949). Toprak Bilgisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın. No: 10, 230 s., Ankara.
  7. Cemeroğlu, B. (1992). Meyve ve Sebze İşleme Endüstrisinde Temel Analiz Metodları. Biltav Yayınları, 351 s., Ankara.
  8. Çimrin, K.M., Karaca, S., & Bozkurt, M.A. (2001). Mısır bitkisinin gelişimi ve beslenmesi üzerine hümik asit ve NPK uygulamalarının etkisi. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2):95-100.
  9. David PP., Nelson PV., & Sanders DC. (1994). A humic acid improves growth of tomato seedling in solution culture. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 17: 173-184.
  10. El-Hefny, E.M. (2010). Effect of saline irrigation water and humic acid application on growth and productivity of two cultivars of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 4(12):6154-6168.
  11. El-Nemr, M.A., El-Desuki, M. El-Bassiony, A.M., & Fawzy Z.F. (2012). Response of growth and yield of cucumber plants ( Cucumis sativus L.) to different foliar applications of humic acid and bio-stimulators. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(3): 630-637.
  12. Erkoç, İ. (2009). Sera domates yetiştiriciliğinde kükürt ve leonardit uygulamalarının fosfor yarayışlılığına etkileri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi. 127 s. Fagbenro, J.A., & Agboola, A.A. (1993). Effect of different levels of humic acids on the growth and nutrient uptake of teak seedlings. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 16(8):1465-1483.
  13. Geraldson, C.M., Klacan, G.R., & Lorenz, O.A. (1973). Plant Analysis as an Aid in Fertilizing