Journals / Horticultural Studies / 2022 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1

Flowering and Non-Flowering Spur Leaf Characteristics of 'Amasya' Apple and Its Comparison with Other Cultivars

Pages
8–14
Publication Date
2022-04-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Knowledge of these characteristics provides a basis for building a model related to yield elaboration of apple trees.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Understanding the attributes of spur leaves in apple trees is essential to gain more insight into the complex process of fruit development and quality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Significant differences among cultivars were observed for the SPAD and spur leaf area.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Knowledge of these characteristics provides a basis for building a model related to yield elaboration of apple trees.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Chlorophyll · Flowering · Greenness index

Abstract

Understanding the attributes of spur leaves in apple trees is essential to gain more insight into the complex process of fruit development and quality. However, limited literature is available about the spur leaf characteristics of the 'Amasya' apple cultivar. In this work, the Soil Plant Analysis Development (SPAD) and leaf area were investigated in flowering and non-flowering spur leaves of 'Amasya' and six common apple cultivars. Significant differences among cultivars were observed for the SPAD and spur leaf area. The median SPAD readings in 'Amasya' were 32.63 and 26.23 for the flowering and non-flowering spurs, respectively, which were the relatively low values among studied cultivars. The maximum SPAD value was measured in flowering spurs of 'Cripps Pink' (45.03). SPAD values were found to be lower in non-flowering spurs compared with flowering ones for all the studied cultivars, which confirms that decline in chlorophyll content coincided with a gradual decline in productivity. A notably significantly lower spur leaf area was found in 'Amasya', whereas the highest spur leaf area was in 'Cripps Pink'. However, no statistical difference was observed between flowering and non-flowering spur leaf areas within the same cultivars. The present results provided a general framework of SPAD and spur leaf areas in 'Amasya' and other apple cultivars when spurs had flowers or not. Knowledge of these characteristics provides a basis for building a model related to yield elaboration of apple trees.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAY, A. N., ATAY, E. (2022). Flowering and Non-Flowering Spur Leaf Characteristics of 'Amasya' Apple and Its Comparison with Other Cultivars. Horticultural Studies, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1, 8–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/671688

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Argenta, G., Ferreira da Silva, P., & Sangoi, L. (2004). Leaf relative chlorophyll content as an indicator to predict nitrogen fertilization in maize. Ciência Rural, 34:1379-1387.
  2. Atay, A.N., Özongun, S., Seymen, T., Bayav, A., & Atay, E. (2016). Variability and heritability of floral development in apple full-sib offsprings. Genetika, 48:383-394.
  3. Atay, A.N., Atay, E., Lauri, P.E., Kunter, B., & Kantoglu, K.Y. (2018). Phenotyping gamma-ray-induced mutant population of 'Amasya' apple for architectural traits, precocity, floral phenology and fruit characteristics. Scientia Horticulturae, 233:195-203.
  4. Atay, E., Crete, X., Loubet, D., & Lauri, P.E. (2019). A moderate regulated deficit irrigation does not negatively affect flowering, fruit-set and return-bloom in a late apple cultivar. Acta Horticulturae, 1253:63-70.
  5. Bairam, E., Delaire, M., Le Morvan, C., & Buck-Sorlin, G. (2017). Models for predicting the architecture of different shoot types in apple. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8:65. Benati, J.A., Nava, G., & Mayer, N.A. (2021). SPAD index for diagnosis of nitrogen status in ‘Esmeralda’ peach. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura Jaboticabal, 43:(e-093). Bishnu, P.K. (2020). SPAD value varies with age and leaf of maize plant and its relationship with grain yield. BMC Research Notes, 13:475. Breda, N.J.J. (2003). Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies Journal of Experimental Botany, 54: 2403-2417.
  6. Brunetto, G., Trentin, G., Ceretta C., Girotto E., Lorensini F., Miotto A., Moser, G.R.Z., & Melo, G. W. de. (2012). Use of the SPAD-502 in estimating nitrogen content in leaves and yield in grapevines in soils with different texture. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 3:1546- 1561. Castelli, F., Contillo, R., & Miceli F (1996). Non-destructive determination of leaf chlorophyll content in four crop species. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 177:275–283.
  7. Cerovic, Z.G., Ghozlen, N.B., Milhade, C., Obert, M., Debuisson, S., & Le Moigne M. (2015). Nondestructive diagnostic test for nitrogen nutrition of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) based on Dualex leafclip measurements in the field. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 63:3669–3680.
  8. Costes, E. (2003). Winter bud content according to position in 3-year-old branching systems of 'Granny Smith' apple. Annual Botany, 92:581–588.
  9. Demirsoy, H. (2009). Leaf area estimation in some species of fruit tree by using models as a non-destructive method. Frui