SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Machiavellianism and Ethical Perception Relations: A Survey in the Banking Sector

MAKYAVELİZM ve ETİK ALGISI İLİŞKİLERİ: BANKACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Semra GÜNEY
Gamze MANDACI
Pages
83–104
Publication Date
2009-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of study, there is anegative relationship between Machiavellianism and ethical perception levels of subjects.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the literature, some studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between Machiavellianism and ethical perception concepts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to identify the relationship between Machiavellianism and ethical perception levels of some salespeople and marketing staff working in the public and private banking sector in Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of study, there is anegative relationship between Machiavellianism and ethical perception levels of subjects.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Makyavelizm · etik algısı · demografik faktörler

Abstract

In the literature, some studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between Machiavellianism and ethical perception concepts. This study aims to identify the relationship between Machiavellianism and ethical perception levels of some salespeople and marketing staff working in the public and private banking sector in Ankara. According to the results of study, there is anegative relationship between Machiavellianism and ethical perception levels of subjects. Additionally, results indicate that gender and education have statistically significant relationships with both Machiavellianism and ethical perception levels of subjects.

Özet

Makyavelizm ve etik algısı kavramları arasındaki ilişkinin saptanması için çeşitli araştırmalar gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada Ankara’da faaliyet gösteren özel ve kamu bankalarının pazarlama ve satış personelinden oluşan örneklemin, Makyavelizm ve etik algılama düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin tespit edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre Makyavelizm düzeyi ve etik algı arasında güçlü bir negatif ilişki saptanmıştır. Ayrıca, cinsiyet ve öğrenim düzeyi şeklinde ifade edilebilecek demografik faktörler ile hem Makyavelizm düzeyleri, hem de etik algı düzeyleri arasında anlamlı ilişkilerin olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEY, S., MANDACI, G. (2009). Machiavellianism and Ethical Perception Relations: A Survey in the Banking Sector. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 83–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/670302

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Al-Khatib, J.A., C.J. Robertson, A.D. Stanton and S.J. Vitell (2002) “Business Ethics in the Arab Gulf States: A Three-Country Study”, International Business Review, 11, 97-111.
  2. Al-Khatip, J.A., S.J. Vitell and M.Y.A. Rawwas (1997) “Consumer Ethics: Across –Cultural Investigation”, European Journal of Marketing, 31, 750-767.
  3. Ang, H.S. and S.M. Leong (2000) “Out of the Mouths of Babes: Business Ethics and Youths in Asia”, Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 128-144.
  4. Arrow, K.J. (1972) “Gifts and Exchanges”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, 343-362.
  5. Ayyoup, T. (2002) “UAB Calls For Banking. Code of Ethics”, Jordan Times, 25 August. Best, B. (1997) “International Business and Ethics: The Role for Ethical Displacement”, Business and the Contemporary World, IX (1), 209-227.
  6. Beu D.S, M.R. Buckley and M.G. Harvey (2003) “Ethical Decision-Making: A Multi-Dimensional Construct”, Business Ethics: A European Review, 12, 88–107.
  7. Bee D. and R.M. Buckley (2001) “The Hypothesized Relationship between Accountability and Ethical Behavior”, Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 57-73.
  8. Christie, R. and F.L. Geis (1970)
  9. Studies in Machiavellianism, New York: New York Academic Press, 10-34.
  10. Dawson, Leslie M. (1997) “Ethical Differences between Men and Women in the Sales Profession”, Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1143–1152.
  11. Deiss, J. (2001) “The Swiss Financial Centre: Achievements and Challenges”, Speech on Financial Excellence, Milan. Donaldson, T. and T. Dunfee (1999) “When Ethics Travel: The Promise And Perils Of Global Business Ethics”, California Management Review, 41(4), 44-63.
  12. Ekin, M.G. and H.S. Tezölmez (1999) “Business Ethics in Turkey: An Empirical Investigation with Special Emphasis on Gender”, Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 17-34.
  13. Erffmeyer, R.C., B.D. Keillor and D.T. LeClair (1999) “An Empirical Investigation of Japanese Consumer Ethics”, Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 35-50.
  14. Ergeneli, A. (2006)
  15. Örgüt ve İnsan, Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  16. Ergeneli, A. and S. Arıkan (2002) “Gender Differences in Ethical Perceptions of Salespeople: An Empirical Examination in Turkey”, Journal of Business Ethics, 40: 247-260.
  17. Ford, C.R. and W.D. Richardson (1994) “Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature”, Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 205-221.
  18. Galie, P.J. and C. Bopst (2006) “Machiavelli & Modern Business: Realist Thought in Contemporary Corporate Leadership Manuals”, Journal of Business Ethics, 65, 235-250.
  19. Geis, F.L. and T.H. Moon (1981) “Machiave