SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Machiavellianism and ethical perception relations : A survey in the banking sector

Makyavelizm ve etik algısı ilişkileri : Bankacılık sektöründe bir araştırma

Gamze MANDACI
Semra GÜNEY
Pages
83–104
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of study, there is anegative relationship between Machiavellianism and ethical perception levels of subjects.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the literature, some studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between Machiavellianism and ethical perception concepts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to identify the relationship between Machiavellianism and ethical perception levels of some salespeople and marketing staff working in the public and private banking sector in Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of study, there is anegative relationship between Machiavellianism and ethical perception levels of subjects.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the literature, some studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between Machiavellianism and ethical perception concepts. This study aims to identify the relationship between Machiavellianism and ethical perception levels of some salespeople and marketing staff working in the public and private banking sector in Ankara. According to the results of study, there is anegative relationship between Machiavellianism and ethical perception levels of subjects. Additionally, results indicate that gender and education have statistically significant relationships with both Machiavellianism and ethical perception levels of subjects.

Özet

Makyavelizm ve etik algısı kavramları arasındaki iliskinin saptanması için çesitli arastırmalar gerçeklestirilmistir. Bu çalısmada Ankara’da faaliyet gösteren özel ve kamu bankalarının pazarlama ve satıs personelinden olusan örneklemin, Makyavelizm ve etik algılama düzeyleri arasındaki iliskinin tespit edilmesi amaçlanmıstır. Arastırma sonuçlarına göre Makyavelizm düzeyi ve etik algı arasında güçlü bir negatif iliski saptanmıstır. Ayrıca, cinsiyet ve öğrenim düzeyi seklinde ifade edilebilecek demografik faktörler ile hem Makyavelizm düzeyleri, hem de etik algı düzeyleri arasında anlamlı iliskilerin olduğu ortaya çıkmıstır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MANDACI, G., GÜNEY, S. (2022). Machiavellianism and ethical perception relations : A survey in the banking sector. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 83–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/533167

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Al-Khatib, J.A., C.J. Robertson, A.D. Stanton and S.J. Vitell (2002) “Business Ethics in the Arab Gulf States: A Three-Country Study”, International Business Review, 11, 97-111.
  2. Al-Khatip, J.A., S.J. Vitell and M.Y.A. Rawwas (1997) “Consumer Ethics: Across – Cultural Investigation”, European Journal of Marketing, 31, 750-767.
  3. Ang, H.S. and S.M. Leong (2000) “Out of the Mouths of Babes: Business Ethics and Youths in Asia”, Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 128-144.
  4. Arrow, K.J. (1972) “Gifts and Exchanges”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, 343-362.
  5. Ayyoup, T. (2002) “UAB Calls For Banking. Code of Ethics”, Jordan Times, 25 August. Best, B. (1997) “International Business and Ethics: The Role for Ethical Displacement”,Business and the Contemporary World, IX (1), 209-227.
  6. Beu D.S, M.R. Buckley and M.G. Harvey (2003) “Ethical Decision-Making: A Multi- Dimensional Construct”, Business Ethics: A European Review, 12, 88–107.
  7. Bee D. and R.M. Buckley (2001) “The Hypothesized Relationship between Accountability and Ethical Behavior”, Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 57-73.
  8. Christie, R. and F.L. Geis (1970)
  9. Studies in Machiavellianism, New York: New York Academic Press, 10-34.
  10. Dawson, Leslie M. (1997) “Ethical Differences between Men and Women in the Sales Profession”, Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1143–1152.
  11. Deiss, J. (2001) “The Swiss Financial Centre: Achievements and Challenges”, Speech on Financial Excellence, Milan. Donaldson, T. and T. Dunfee (1999) “When Ethics Travel: The Promise And Perils Of Global Business Ethics”, California Management Review, 41(4), 44-63.
  12. Ekin, M.G. and H.S. Tezölmez (1999) “Business Ethics in Turkey: An Empirical Investigation with Special Emphasis on Gender”, Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 17-34.
  13. Erffmeyer, R.C., B.D. Keillor and D.T. LeClair (1999) “An Empirical Investigation of Japanese Consumer Ethics”, Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 35-50.
  14. Ergeneli, A. (2006) Örgüt ve Đnsan, Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  15. Ergeneli, A. and S. Arıkan (2002) “Gender Differences in Ethical Perceptions of Salespeople: An Empirical Examination in Turkey”, Journal of Business Ethics, 40: 247-260.
  16. Ford, C.R. and W.D. Richardson (1994) “Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature”, Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 205-221.
  17. Galie, P.J. and C. Bopst (2006) “Machiavelli & Modern Business: Realist Thought in Contemporary Corporate Leadership Manuals”, Journal of Business Ethics,65, 235-250.
  18. Geis, F.L. and T.H. Moon (1981) “Machiave