SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Birth Perceptions of Midwifery Students and Its Relationship with Premenstural Syndrome

Ebelik Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Doğum Algıları ve Premenstural Sendrom ile İlişkisi

Sümeyye BARUT
Pages
444–453
Publication Date
2022-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was determined that the relationship between students' PMS scale total score scores and TCPS total score scores was low, positive and significant ( r (214)=0,14, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this cross-sectional study, birth perceptions of midwifery students and their relationship with premenstural syndrome were examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was carried out with 214 midwifery students of Fırat University Faculty of Health Sciences in April 2021.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was determined that the relationship between students' PMS scale total score scores and TCPS total score scores was low, positive and significant ( r (214)=0,14, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ebe · Öğrenci · Travmatik doğum algısı

Abstract

In this cross-sectional study, birth perceptions of midwifery students and their relationship with premenstural syndrome were examined. The study was carried out with 214 midwifery students of Fırat University Faculty of Health Sciences in April 2021. The data were collected using the Personal Information Form prepared by the researcher, the Traumatic Birth Perception Scale (TCPS) and the Premenstrual Syndrome Scale (PMS). Analysis of the data used number, percentage, mean, chi-square test and Pearson correlation analysis in SPSS 22.0 program. It was determined that 77.1% of the students had a medium and above traumatic birth perception, 66.4% of them experienced premenstural symptoms. The total mean score of the students from the PMS scale was determined to be 127,27±42,15, and the average TCPS score to 70,64±23,56. It was determined that the relationship between students' PMS scale total score scores and TCPS total score scores was low, positive and significant ( r (214)=0,14, p

Özet

Kesitsel tipte olan bu çalışmada ebelik bölümü öğrencilerinin doğum algıları ve premenstural sendrom ile ilişkisi incelenmiştir. Çalışma Nisan 2021 tarihlerinde Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi’nin 214 Ebelik Bölümü öğrencisi ile yürütülmüştür. Veriler araştırmacı tarafından hazırlanan Kişisel Bilgi Formu ile Travmatik Doğum Algısı Ölçeği (TDAÖ) ve Premenstrual Sendrom Ölçeği (PMS) kullanılarak toplandı. Verilerin analizi SPSS 22.0 programında; sayı, yüzde, ortalama, ki kare testi ve Pearson korelasyon analizi kullanılarak yapıldı. Öğrencilerin %77,1’inin orta ve üzerinde travmatik doğum algısına sahip olduğu, %66,4’ünün premenstural semptom yaşadığı belirlendi. Öğrencilerin PMS ölçeğinden aldıkları toplam puan ortalaması 127,27±42,15, TDAÖ puan ortalaması 70,64±23,56 olarak belirlendi. Öğrencilerin PMS ölçeği toplam puan skorları ve TDAÖ toplam puan skorları arasındaki ilişkinin düşük seviyede, pozitif yönde ve anlamlı olduğu belirlendi ( r (214)=0,14, p

🔖

Cite This Article

BARUT, S. (2022). Birth Perceptions of Midwifery Students and Its Relationship with Premenstural Syndrome. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 444–453. https://ajindex.com/articles/668588

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Yıldırım, G. ve Hotun Şahin, N. (2003). “Doğum ağrısının kontrolünde hemşirelik yaklaşımı’’. CÜ Hemşirelik Yüksek Okulu Dergisi, 7 (1), 14-20
  2. İsbir, G.G. ve İnci, F. (2014). “Travmatik Doğum Ve Hemşirelik Yaklaşımları”. Kadın Sağlığı Hemşireliği Dergisi, 1 (1), 29-40
  3. Jafari, E, Mohebbi, P. and Mazloomzadeh, S. (2017). “Factors related to women's childbirth satisfaction in physiologic and routine childbirth groups”. Iranian Journal Of Nursing And Midwifery Research, 22 (3), 219
  4. World Health Organization. (2018). “Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization. Erişim adresi: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260178/9789241550215-eng.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 27.04.2021)
  5. Rizk, D.E, Mosallam, M, Alyan, S. and Nagelkerke, N. (2006). “Prevalence and impact of premenstrual syndrome in adolescent schoolgirls in the United Arab Emirates”. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 85 (5), 589-598
  6. Selçuk, K.T, Avcı, D. ve Alp, F.Y. (2014). “Hemşirelik öğrencilerinde premenstrual sendrom prevalansı ve etkileyen etmenler”. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 5 (2), 98-103
  7. Matsumoto, T, Egawa, M, Kimura, T, and Hayashi, T. (2019). “A potential relation between premenstrual symptoms and subjective perception of health and stress among college students: a cross-sectional study”. BioPsychoSocial medicine, 13, 26
  8. Bohren, M.A, Hofmeyr, G.J, Sakala, C, Fukuzawa, R.K. and Cuthbert, A. (2017). “Continuous support for women during childbirth”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (7), 1-10
  9. Şimşek, H, Demirci, H. ve Bolsoy, N. (2018). “Sosyal destek sistemleri ve ebelik”. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8 (2), 97-103. 10
  10. Dahlen, H.G, Barclay, L.M, and Homer, C. S. (2010). “The novice birthing: theorising first-time mothers” experiences of birth at home and in hospital in Australia”. Midwifery, 26 (1), 53-63
  11. Kapisiz, O, Karaca, A, Suzer Ozkan, F. and Gulen Savas, H. (2017). “Perceptions of nursing students regarding childbirth”. Journal of Duzce University Health Sciences Institute, 7 (3), 156-160. 13
  12. Gençdoğan, B. (2006). “Premenstruel sendrom için yeni bir ölçek”. Türkiye'de Psikiyatri Dergisi, 8 (2), 81-87
  13. Yalnız, H, Canan, F, Ekti Genç, R, Kuloğlu, M.M. ve Geçici, Ö. (2017). “Travmatik doğum algısı ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi”. Yeni Tıp Dergisi 6, 81-87
  14. De Schepper, S, Vercauteren, T, Tersago, J, Jacquemyn, Y, Raes, F, and Franck, E. (2016).