It’s not possible in the term of examining a particular prophetic text or critizing its understanding to question everyone’s intention toward it , just As there is who follows a motivational tendency when it came to studying those text, there is on the other hand who stands behind an intellectual motivation in attempt to re-read the prophetic text in its proper context , however this attempt of contextualize come in clash in reality with what can be called the common believe of the Umma who is deeply attached not only with the text itself as a sacred one but with the different interpretations which by the time become as indubitable as the text itself and then make the process of re-examine it as if it is an endeavor of skepticism towards one of the main pillars that represent the belief of the Umma, even when those interpretations it’s not in conformity with the spirit of the Quran This paper represents and set up a new methodology of re-read thoughtfully those debatable texts based on two essential steps: first is to free the text from different interpretations in order for the original intended meaning to be clear and then this study will also show in a practical manner the very different between this original methodological way of reading and the influence that shaped the common belief towards those texts.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It’s not possible in the term of examining a particular prophetic text or critizing its understanding to question everyone’s intention toward it , just As there is who follows a motivational tendency when it came to studying those text, there is on the other hand who stands behind an intellectual motivation in attempt to re-read the prophetic text in its proper context , however this attempt of contextualize come in clash in reality with what can be called the common believe of the Umma who is deeply attached not only with the text itself as a sacred one but with the different interpretations which by the time become as indubitable as the text itself and then make the process of re-examine it as if it is an endeavor of skepticism towards one of the main pillars that represent the belief of the Umma, even when those interpretations it’s not in conformity with the spirit of the Quran This paper represents and set up a new methodology of re-read thoughtfully those debatable texts based on two essential steps: first is to free the text from different interpretations in order for the original intended meaning to be clear and then this study will also show in a practical manner the very different between this original methodological way of reading and the influence that shaped the common belief towards those texts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It’s not possible in the term of examining a particular prophetic text or critizing its understanding to question everyone’s intention toward it , just As there is who follows a motivational tendency when it came to studying those text, there is on the other hand who stands behind an intellectual motivation in attempt to re-read the prophetic text in its proper context , however this attempt of contextualize come in clash in reality with what can be called the common believe of the Umma who is deeply attached not only with the text itself as a sacred one but with the different interpretations which by the time become as indubitable as the text itself and then make the process of re-examine it as if it is an endeavor of skepticism towards one of the main pillars that represent the belief of the Umma, even when those interpretations it’s not in conformity with the spirit of the Quran This paper represents and set up a new methodology of re-read thoughtfully those debatable texts based on two essential steps: first is to free the text from different interpretations in order for the original intended meaning to be clear and then this study will also show in a practical manner the very different between this original methodological way of reading and the influence that shaped the common belief towards those texts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It’s not possible in the term of examining a particular prophetic text or critizing its understanding to question everyone’s intention toward it , just As there is who follows a motivational tendency when it came to studying those text, there is on the other hand who stands behind an intellectual motivation in attempt to re-read the prophetic text in its proper context , however this attempt of contextualize come in clash in reality with what can be called the common believe of the Umma who is deeply attached not only with the text itself as a sacred one but with the different interpretations which by the time become as indubitable as the text itself and then make the process of re-examine it as if it is an endeavor of skepticism towards one of the main pillars that represent the belief of the Umma, even when those interpretations it’s not in conformity with the spirit of the Quran This paper represents and set up a new methodology of re-read thoughtfully those debatable texts based on two essential steps: first is to free the text from different interpretations in order for the original intended meaning to be clear and then this study will also show in a practical manner the very different between this original methodological way of reading and the influence that shaped the common belief towards those texts.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hadis metni · eş zamanlı okuma · yorumlayıcı okuma
Abstract
It’s not possible in the term of examining a particular prophetic text or critizing its understanding to question everyone’s intention toward it , just As there is who follows a motivational tendency when it came to studying those text, there is on the other hand who stands behind an intellectual motivation in attempt to re-read the prophetic text in its proper context , however this attempt of contextualize come in clash in reality with what can be called the common believe of the Umma who is deeply attached not only with the text itself as a sacred one but with the different interpretations which by the time become as indubitable as the text itself and then make the process of re-examine it as if it is an endeavor of skepticism towards one of the main pillars that represent the belief of the Umma, even when those interpretations it’s not in conformity with the spirit of the Quran This paper represents and set up a new methodology of re-read thoughtfully those debatable texts based on two essential steps: first is to free the text from different interpretations in order for the original intended meaning to be clear and then this study will also show in a practical manner the very different between this original methodological way of reading and the influence that shaped the common belief towards those texts.
Özet
Sahîhayn’da “bilgelik şüphesi” özelliğini taşıyan hadisler bulunduğundan hadisleri her eleştirenin niyetinden şüphe etmek mümkün değildir. Çünkü söz konusu şüphelerini ortadan kaldırma amaçlı farklı okumalar yapmak isteyenler de vardır. Fakat bu şahıslar, ümmetin kolektif aklıyla karşı karşıya geleceklerini düşünerek hadislere yaklaşımda fikirlerini ortaya koymaktan çekinirler. Zîrâ genel olarak milletin anlayışında Kur’ân ruhuna veya dinin asıllarına muhalefet eden delaletleri dahi tartışmak ve bu delaletleri yeniden gözden geçirmek, ümmetin sabit temellerini ve kabul ettikleri inançlarını şüphe altında sorgulamakla eşdeğer görülür. Peki, metnin orijinal anlamını korumak için hadis metninin güvenilir okuması nasıl olmalıdır ve hadis metni, ortaya çıktığı zamandan sonra oluşan insanlık anlayışından etkilenebilir mi?Bu araştırma bu guruptaki metinlere dâir yeni bir okuma önerisine temel oluşturur. Söz konusu öneri iki ana aşamaya dayalı bir okumadır. Bu okuma, metnin orijinal anlamını ve ham anlamını ortaya çıkararak okuyanı şahsî fikirlerden büyük ölçüde arındırır. Okuyacağınız makalede, orijinal okuma ile ümmetin kolektif zihnindeki anlayışlarıyla sabit olanlar arasındaki fark ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Eleştirel ve analitik düşünme metodunu uyguladığımız bu çalışmamız; giriş, iki bölüm ve sonuçtan oluşmaktadır.
KORİCHİ, M. (2018). The prophetic text (Hadith) between the simultaneous interpretative reading and the objective reading. Nüsha, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 47, 269–308. https://ajindex.com/articles/66686
ثبت المصادر والمراجع:1 ـــ إرشاد الساري لشرح صحيح البخاري، أبو العباس أحمد بن محمد شهاب الدين القسطلاني، المطبعة الكبرى الأميرية، مصر، ط: السابعة، 1323 هـ.2 ـــ أضواء البيان في إيضاح القرآن بالقرآن، محمد الأمين بن محمد المختار الشنقيطي، دار الفكر للطباعة و النشر و التوزيع بيروت – لبنان، 1415 هـ - 1995 مـ. 3 ـــ البحر المديد في تفسير القرآن المجيد، أبو العباس أحمد بن محمد، ت: أحمد عبد الله القرشي رسلان، الدكتور حسن عباس زكي – القاهرة، ط: الأولى، 1419 هـ. 4 ـــ البيان والتعريف في أسباب ورود الحديث الشريف، إبراهيم بن محمد، برهان الدين ابن حَمْزَة الحنفي الدمشقيّ، ت: سيف الدين الكاتب، دار الكتاب العربي – بيروت. دط.5 ـــ التحرير والتنوير «تحرير المعنى السديد وتنوير العقل الجديد من تفسير الكتاب المجيد»، محمد الطاهر بن عاشور، الدار التونسية للنشر - تونس: 1984 هـ.6 ـــ التسهيل لعلوم التنزيل، أبو القاسم، محمد بن أحمد ابن جزي، ت: الدكتور عبد الله الخالد، شركة دار الأرقم بن أبي الأرقم – بيروت، ط: الأولى - 1416 هـ. 7 ـــ التمهيد لما في الموطأ من المعاني والأسانيد أبو عمر يوسف بن عبد البر، ت: مصطفى بن أحمد العلوي, محمد عبد الكبير البكري، وزارة عموم الأوقاف والشؤون الإسلامية – المغرب، 1387 هـ.8 ـــ الجامع المسند الصحيح المختصر من أمور رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم وسننه وأيامه = صحيح البخاري، محمد بن إسماعيل أبو عبدالله البخاري الجعفي، ت: محمد زهير بن ناصر الناصر، دار طوق النجاة (مصورة عن السلطانية بإضافة ترقيم محمد فؤاد عبد الباقي)، ط: الأولى، 1422هـ.9 ـــ الجامع لأحكام القرآن = تفسير القرطبي، أبو عبد الله محمد شمس الدين، ت: أحمد البردوني وإبراهيم أطفيش، دار الكتب المصرية – القاهرة، ط: الثانية، 1384هـ - 1964 م.10 ـــ الجواهر الحسان في تفسير القرآن، أبو زيد عبد الرحمن الثعالبي، ت: محمد علي معوض وعادل أحمد عبد الموجود، دار إحياء التراث العربي – بيروت، ط: الأولى - 1418 هـ.11 ـــ السنن الكبرى، أحمد بن الحسين أبو بكر البيهقي، ت: محمد عبد القادر عطا، دار الكتب العلمية، بيروت – لبنات، ط: الثالثة، 1424 هـ - 2003 م.12 ـــ العَذْبُ النَّمِيرُ مِنْ مَجَالِسِ الشَّنْقِيطِيِّ فِي التَّفْسِيرِ، محمد الأمين بن محمد المختار الشنقيطي، ت: خالد بن عثمان السبت، دار عالم الفوائد للنشر والتوزيع، مكة المكرمة، ط: الثانية، 1426 هـ.13 ـــ العرف الشذي شرح سنن الترمذي، محمد أنور شاه بن معظم شاه الكشميري الهندي، تصحيح: الشيخ محمود شاكر، دار التراث العربي -بيروت، لبنان، ط: الأولى، 1425 هـ - 2004م.14 ـــ المجتبى من السنن = السنن الصغرى للنسائي، أبو عبد الرحمن أحمد بن شعيب بن علي الخراساني، النسائي، ت: عبد الفتاح أبو غدة، مكتب المطبوعات الإسلامية – حلب، ط: الثانية، 1406 – 1986م.15 ـــ المحرر الوجيز في تفسير الكتاب العزيز، أبو محمد عبد الحق بن عطية، ت: عبد السلام عبد الشافي محمد، دار الكتب العلمية – ب