SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Decision Making For Rail System Projects With AHP-GP and ANP-GP

Raylı Sistem Projeleri Kararında Ahs-Hp Ve Aas-Hp Kombinasyonu

Mustafa Hamurcu
Tamer Eren
Pages
1–13
Publication Date
2017-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the same results were obtained in the goal programming solutions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As one of the most crowded cities in the world, Istanbul attaches great importance to investments in rail system and makes projects to solve the problem of urban transportation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to be impossible for every projected project to be passed on to life, todays, the necessity of project selection is emerge in according to scarce resources.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the same results were obtained in the goal programming solutions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ANP · AHP · Raylı sistemler

Abstract

As one of the most crowded cities in the world, Istanbul attaches great importance to investments in rail system and makes projects to solve the problem of urban transportation. Due to be impossible for every projected project to be passed on to life, todays, the necessity of project selection is emerge in according to scarce resources. Multicriteria decision making process is required in the transportation project selection due to the evaluation with various factors such as cost, engineering, population, access, integration etc. In this study, the analytic network process and the analitic hierarcy process was used individually to weight the selection criteria and the best suitable projects were selected from the projected rail system projects for Istanbul with the founded AHP-GP and ANP-GP models. Finally, the results found by this method were compared and evaluated. The AHP and ANP ranking were made, then the project selection problem is solved with the AHP-HP and ANP-HP.The ranking found with AHP and ANP in the weighting process varied. However, the same results were obtained in the goal programming solutions.

Özet

Dünyanın en kalabalık şehirlerinden biri olan İstanbul, kent içi ulaşım problemini çözmek için raylı sistem yatırımlarına önem vermekte ve projeler ortaya koymaktadır. Düşünülen her projenin hayata geçirilmesinin imkânsız olduğu günümüzde kıt kaynaklar doğrultusunda proje seçiminin yapılması zorunluluğu ortaya çıkmaktadır. Ulaşım projesi seçiminin maliyet, mühendislik, nüfus, erişim, entegrasyon vb. gibi çeşitli faktörler doğrultusunda değerlendirilmesi çok kriterli karar verme sürecini gerekli kılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, analitik ağ süreci (AAS) ve analitik hiyerarşi süreci (AHS) ile ayrı ayrı projelerin ağırlıklandırılması yapılarak ortaya konulan hedef programlama (HP) modeli ile İstanbul için düşünülen raylı sistem projeleri arasından seçim yapılmıştır. Yapılan ağırlıklandırma ile AHS sırası, AAS sırası ve sonra AHSHP ile AAS-HP çözümleri gösterilmiştir. Ağırlıklandırma sürecinde bulunan sıralamalar farklılık göstermiştir. Ancak hedef programlama çözümlerinde ise aynı sonuçlar elde edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Hamurcu, M., Eren, T. (2017). Decision Making For Rail System Projects With AHP-GP and ANP-GP. Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 1–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/666779

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Meade L.M., Presley A. R&D project selection using the analytic network process. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 2012, 49:59-66. DOI: 10.1109/17.985748 [2] Cheng E.W., Li H. Analytic network process applied to project selection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2005, 131: 459-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:4(459) [3] Begičević N., Divjak B., Hunjak T. Decisionmaking on prioritization of projects in higher education institutions using the analytic network process approach, Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2010, 18:341-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-009-0113-3 [4] Ivanović I., Grujičić D., Macura D., Jović J., Bojović N. One approach for road transport project selection. Transport Policy, 2013, 25:22-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.10.001 [5] Grady C.A., He X., Peeta S. Integrating social network analysis with analytic network process for international development project selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42: 5128-5138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.039 [6] Tuzkaya U.R., Yolver E. R&D project selectıon by integrated grey analytic network process and grey relational analysis: an implementation for home appliances company. Journal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies, 2015, 8: 35-41. DOI: 10.7603/s40690-015-0014-8. [7] Lee J.W., Kim S.H. An integrated approach for interdependent information system project selection. International Journal of Project Management, 2001, 19:111-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00053-8 [8] Wey W.M., Wu K.Y. Using ANP priorities with goal programming in resource allocation in transportation. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 2007, 46:985-1000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.017. [9] Ravi V., Shankar R., Tiwari M.K. Selection of a reverse logistics project for end-of-life computers: ANP and goal programing approach. International Journal of Production Research, 2008, 46:4849-4870. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207540601115989 [10] Hamurcu M., Gür Ş., Özder E.H., Eren T. A multicriteria decision making for monorail projects with analytic network process and 0-1 goal programming. International Journal of Advances in Electronics and Computer Science (IJAECS), 2016, 3:8-12. [11] Gür Ş., Hamurcu M., Eren T., Ankara‟da monoray projelerinin analitik hiyerarşi prosesi ve 0-1 hedef programlama ile seçimi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 2017, 23:437-443.