SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 2

Small And Micro-Modular Reactors As A Clean Energy Source: Environmental Impacts And Comparative Analysis

Ömer Faruk Tunçbilek(Türkiye Enerji Nükleer ve Maden Araştırma Kurumu-Temiz Enerji Araştırma Enstitüsü)0000-0002-9156-4025
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-08-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal that SMR and MMR have a critical role as a base load in line with net-zero targets, but emphasize that realizing this potential depends on solving structural problems such as nuclear waste, water usage, and proliferation risk.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article examines Small Modular Reactors (SMR) and Micro Modular Reactors (MMR) technologies, which are gaining increasing importance in the global energy transition alongside renewable energy sources on Turkey's path to clean energy independence, through a comparative analysis of their environmental impacts and other resources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study investigates the definition and classification of these reactors, their current global development status, environmental advantages such as low carbon footprint, and various environmental risks, primarily nuclear waste management.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal that SMR and MMR have a critical role as a base load in line with net-zero targets, but emphasize that realizing this potential depends on solving structural problems such as nuclear waste, water usage, and proliferation risk.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Clean Energy · Nuclear Energy · Small Modular Reactor

Abstract

This article examines Small Modular Reactors (SMR) and Micro Modular Reactors (MMR) technologies, which are gaining increasing importance in the global energy transition alongside renewable energy sources on Turkey's path to clean energy independence, through a comparative analysis of their environmental impacts and other resources. The study investigates the definition and classification of these reactors, their current global development status, environmental advantages such as low carbon footprint, and various environmental risks, primarily nuclear waste management. In addition, SMR/MMR technologies are evaluated comparatively with fossil fuels and renewable energy sources within the framework of life cycle analysis (LCA). The findings reveal that SMR and MMR have a critical role as a base load in line with net-zero targets, but emphasize that realizing this potential depends on solving structural problems such as nuclear waste, water usage, and proliferation risk.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tunçbilek, Ö. F. (2026). Small And Micro-Modular Reactors As A Clean Energy Source: Environmental Impacts And Comparative Analysis. Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 12 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.30855/gmbd.070526A08

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. International Energy Agency (IEA), “CO₂ emissions in 2023,” IEA, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/c2-emissions-in-2023. [Accessed: Apr. 10, 2026].
  2. International Energy Agency (IEA), “Global energy review 2025: CO₂ emissions,” IEA, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org. [Accessed: Apr. 10, 2026].
  3. International Energy Agency (IEA), “Nuclear power,” IEA, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/energy-system/electricity/nuclear-power. [Accessed: Apr. 10, 2026].
  4. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), “What are small modular reactors (SMRs)?,” IAEA, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.iaea.org/topics/small-modular-reactors. [Accessed: May 20, 2026].
  5. World Nuclear Association (WNA), “Small modular reactors,” World Nuclear Association, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-power-reactors/small-nuclear-power-reactors. [Accessed: May 20, 2026].
  6. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), “SMR technology catalogue 2024,” IAEA, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iaea.org. [Accessed: May 23, 2026].
  7. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.
  8. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), “Small modular reactors and microreactors under development in the United States,” EIA, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=67584. [Accessed: May 25, 2026].
  9. European Commission, “Small modular reactors explained,” Energy – European Commission, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/nuclear-energy/small-modular-reactors/small-modular-reactors-explained_en. [Accessed: May 25, 2026].
  10. Energy Sustainability Directory, “What are SMRs' long-term environmental effects?,” Energy Sustainability Directory, 2025. [Online]. Available: [suspicious link removed]. [Accessed: May 19, 2026].
  11. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), “Life cycle assessment of electricity generation options,” UNECE, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/LCA_final.pdf. [Accessed: Apr. 23, 2026].
  12. International Energy Agency (IEA), “Nuclear power and secure energy transitions,” IEA, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/nuclear-power-and-secure-energy-transitions. [Accessed: Apr. 23, 2026].
  13. International Energy Agency (IEA), “The path to a new era for nuclear energy – Executive summary,” IEA, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/the-path-to-a-new-era-for-nuclear-energy. [Accessed: Apr. 10, 2026].
  14. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), “Decarbonizing industries with the help of small and micro nuclear reactors,” IAEA Bulletin, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iaea.org/bulletin. [Accessed: May 23, 2026].
  15. American Nuclear Society (ANS), “White paper argues for SMRs over renewables for data centers,” Nuclear Newswire, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ans.org/news/article-6460. [Accessed: May 24, 2026].
  16. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), “IAEA milestones guidance updated to include considerations for SMRs,” IAEA, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iaea.org/newscenter. [Accessed: May 23, 2026].
  17. K. J. Metzger, “Nuclear waste from small modular reactors,” Physics 241: Introduction to the Physics of Nuclear Energy, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, USA, Course Paper, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2024/ph241/nafi1/. [Accessed: May 12, 2026].
  18. Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), “Argonne releases small modular reactor waste analysis report,” ANL, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.anl.gov/article/argonne-releases-small-modular-reactor-waste-analysis-report. [Accessed: Apr. 23, 2026].
  19. Food & Water Watch, “Going nuclear in the neighborhood: The dangers of small modular reactors,” Food & Water Watch, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/2506_FSW_GoingNuclear.pdf. [Accessed: May 01, 2026].
  20. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), “Combating climate change while promoting nonproliferation: Addressing new nuclear risks from SMRs and FNPPs,” Center for Global Security Research (CGSR), 2020. [Online]. Available: https://cgsr.llnl.gov/sites/cgsr/files/2024-08/SMR-FNPP-Risk_9.15.22_EJ_FINAL.pdf. [Accessed: May 01, 2026].
  21. Canadian Environmental Law Association (CELA), “A dangerous distraction from real climate action in Canada,” CELA, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://cela.ca/take-action-against-small-modular-reactors/. [Accessed: Apr. 14, 2026].
  22. World Nuclear Association (WNA), “Comparison of lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various electricity generation sources,” World Nuclear Association, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://world-nuclear.org/images/articles/comparison_of_lifecycle1.pdf. [Accessed: May 01, 2026].
  23. Clean Air Task Force (CATF), “Assessing hydrogen emissions across the entire lifecycle,” CATF, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.catf.us. [Accessed: Apr. 15, 2026].
  24. H. Ritchie, “How does the land use of different electricity sources compare?,” Our World in Data, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-per-energy-source. [Accessed: May 01, 2026].
  25. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), “Capacity factors for utility-scale generators,” EIA, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_6_07_b. [Accessed: May 25, 2026].
  26. Energy Sustainability Directory, “How does SMR cost compare to renewables?,” Energy Sustainability Directory, 2025. [Online]. Available: [suspicious link removed]. [Accessed: Apr. 15, 2026].
  27. H. Ritchie and P. Rosado, “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?,” Our World in Data, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy. [Accessed: May 01, 2026].
  28. IPCC, “Annex II: Metrics & methodology,” in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, O. Edenhofer et al., Eds. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014, pp. 1281–1306.
  29. X. Wang, L. Guo, G. Xue, J. Tan, W. Niu, and Y. Wu, “Toward low-carbon power systems: Reviewing life cycle carbon footprints of diverse generation pathways,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 24, Art. no. 6413, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.3390/en18246413.
  30. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD-NEA), “NEA SMR dashboard Edition II,” OECD-NEA, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_73678. [Accessed: May 23, 2026].
  31. International Energy Agency (IEA), “Outlook for nuclear investment,” in The Path to a New Era for Nuclear Energy, IEA, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/the-path-to-a-new-era-for-nuclear-energy/outlook-for-nuclear-investment. [Accessed: Apr. 10, 2026].
  32. L. M. Krall, A. M. Macfarlane, and R. C. Ewing, “Nuclear waste from small modular reactors,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119, no. 23, Art. no. e2111833119, Jun. 2022. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111833119
  33. T. Gibon and Á. Hahn Menacho, “Parametric life cycle assessment of nuclear power for simplified models,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 57, no. 38, pp. 14194–14205, Sep. 2023. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c03190
  34. J. Lovering et al., “Land-use intensity of electricity production and tomorrow’s energy landscape,” PLoS ONE, vol. 17, no. 7, Art. no. e0270155, Jul. 2022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270155