SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskiyeni / 2014 / Sayı: 29

On Relation between Habit and Morality in the Thoughts of Ibn Sina (Avicenna) and Felix Ravaisson

İbn Sina ve Felix Ravaisson’da Alışkanlık ve Ahlâk İlişkisi Üzerine

Muhammet Enes KALA
Journal
Eskiyeni
Pages
121–145
Publication Date
2014-12-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The paper, in one respect, shall take on a task to examine the relation between morality and habit.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The simple words, which have been used in daily life, may seem totally different with aid of the philosophical point of view.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this paper, we shall attempt to examine a word, the concept of habit we often use in daily life and its relation with morality as a practical area in the thoughts of Ibn Sina (Avicenna) and Ravaisson.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The paper, in one respect, shall take on a task to examine the relation between morality and habit.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Alışkanlık · ahlâk · Aristoteles

Abstract

The simple words, which have been used in daily life, may seem totally different with aid of the philosophical point of view. In this paper, we shall attempt to examine a word, the concept of habit we often use in daily life and its relation with morality as a practical area in the thoughts of Ibn Sina (Avicenna) and Ravaisson. Both of the thinkers, who were impressed by Aristotle, have assigned the concept of habit a private place in their understandings of morality. The paper, in one respect, shall take on a task to examine the relation between morality and habit.

Özet

Günlük yaşamda kullanılan basit sözcükler felsefi bakış açısıyla bambaşka görünebilir. Bu çalışmada günlük yaşamda sıklıkla kullandığımız bir sözcük olan alışkanlık kelimesinin pratik bir alan olan ahlâk ile ilişkisini, İbn Sina ve Ravaisson’un düşünceleri üzerinden sorgulamaya çalışacağız. Aristoteles’ten çok ciddi şekilde etkilenen her iki düşünür de kendi ahlâk düşüncelerinde alışkanlık kavramına önemli bir yer tahsis etmiştir. Bu çalışma bir bakıma ahlâk ile alışkanlığın arasında kurulan ilişkiyi sorgulama görevini üstlenecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALA, M. E. (2014). On Relation between Habit and Morality in the Thoughts of Ibn Sina (Avicenna) and Felix Ravaisson. Eskiyeni, Sayı: 29, 121–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/664542

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Âmiri, es-Saâde ve’l-s’ad fi-Sireti’l Insaniyye, Tehran: Intişarat-ı Danisgah, 1336 h. Andrews, B.K., “Habit”, The American Journal of Psychology, 14:2 (1903).
  2. Aristotle, Ethics, ed. David Bostock, Oxford: OUP, 2000.
  3. Aristotle, The Basic Works of Aristotle, transl-ed. Richard Mckeon, New York: Oxford University Press, 1941.
  4. Aristotle, Nicomechean Ethics, ed. Roger Crisp, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  5. Benedict, R., Patterns of Culture, London: Penguin, 1934.
  6. Bichat, X., Psychological Researches on Life and Death, transl. Tobias Watkins, Smith and Maxwell, Phidelphia, 1809. Biran, Maine de (e.d.) The Influence of Habit on The Faculty of Thinking, transl. Margaret Donaldson Boehm, Weitport: C.T Greenwood Press.
  7. Boer, T.J., The History of Philosophy in Islam, transl. Edward Jones, Rowe and Biydane, London, 1933.
  8. Bonet, P., Ravaisson, Mollien Jean-Gaspart Felix (1813-1900), (Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Vol. 8, Ed. Edvard Craig, Routledge, London, 1998)
  9. Bostock, D., Aristotle Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  10. Bowyer, C., Philosophical Perspectives for Education,: Scot Foresman, Illinois, 1970.
  11. Copleston, F., A History of Philosophy, vol. 9, London: Search Press, 1975.
  12. Carlisle, C. “Clare Carlisle, Becoming and Unbecoming The Theory and Practice of Anatta” Contemporary Buddhism, 7:1, (2006), pp. 75-89.
  13. Carlisle, C. and Sinclair, M. Editors’ Comments (2008a) (in Ravaisson, F. Of Habit, transl. Clare Carlisle and Mark Sinclair, Continuum, London, 2008.)
  14. Carlisle, C. and Sinclair M. (2008b) Introduction. (in Ravaisson, F. Of Habit, transl. Clare Carlisle and Mark Sinclair, Continuum, London, 2008.)
  15. Carlisle, C. The Force of Habit in 19th Century French Philosophy, Ravaisson after Maine de Biran. Carlisle, C. “Between Freedom and Necessity: Felix Ravaisson on Habit and The Moral Life” (Basılmamış Ders Notu) 2008.
  16. Dunlop, K., “The Identity of Instinct and Habit”, The Journal of Phil osophy, 19: 4 (1922).
  17. Fakhry, M., A History of Islamic Philosophy, New York: Colombia Uni. Press, 1970.
  18. Fakhry, M., Ethical Theories in Islam, New York: E.J. Brill, 1991.
  19. Hume, D., An Enquiriy Concerning Human Understanding, Oxford: Clanderon Press, 1902.
  20. İbn Sina, El-Necâd, Cairo: Babi al Halabi, 1357 h. İbn Sina, Kitab al-Siyasa, ed. by Louis Maaluf, Cairo: Majallat al-Sarq, 1906.
  21. İbn Sina, Kitabu’l Hudûd, Intişâra Bidar, 1400 h. İbn Sina, Metafizik 2. ter. Ekrem Demirli-Ömer Türker, İstanbul: Litera Yay., 2005.
  22. İbn Sina, Risale fi’s-Saâde, Dairetu’l