Journals / Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering / 2022 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

ANALYSIS OF THE COLLISION EFFECT FOR ADJACENT STRUCTURES IN THE TIME-FREQUENCY DOMAIN

Pages
195–206
Publication Date
2022-09-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To determine the effects of earthquake joints, condition assessment and damage detection studies were carried out and the sufficiency of seismic joints was discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Many reinforced concrete structures are built side by side in our cities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Turkish Building Earthquake Code (TBEC) 2018 requires calculations of vertical joints for some types of structures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To determine the effects of earthquake joints, condition assessment and damage detection studies were carried out and the sufficiency of seismic joints was discussed.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Attached RC Structures · Collision Effect · Time-Frequency Analysis

Abstract

Many reinforced concrete structures are built side by side in our cities. There are very few applications of earthquake joints in adjacent apartment buildings, most of them were constructed completely adjacent. Adjoining buildings or any property should be protected from damage or collapse during construction, restoration and demolition work. In case of the static condition, protection must be supplied for foundations, walls and roofs. We have already observed many building collapses in Turkey with a great number of life lost. For the constructed buildings, there is a need to understand the structural system of an existing building to manage risk. In case of earthquakes like dynamic loading, earthquake joints are essential. The Turkish Building Earthquake Code (TBEC) 2018 requires calculations of vertical joints for some types of structures. Earthquake joints should be left in the gap calculated for structures of some height. It is thought that this gap will prevent the structures from colliding. However, it has been the subject of research how the performance of the building will change when it is produced adjacent or when floor offsets cause collisions at earthquake joints. In this study, structures of different heights were analyzed in the time domain for specific earthquake motions. Collision situations of more than two buildings are discussed by making a street model. Structural performances of discrete and adjacent structures obtained from nonlinear analysis were compared. The motion parameters obtained from the structures were analyzed in the time-frequency domain by wavelet and Hilbert transforms. To determine the effects of earthquake joints, condition assessment and damage detection studies were carried out and the sufficiency of seismic joints was discussed.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAK, Ö. F., BEYEN, K. (2022). ANALYSIS OF THE COLLISION EFFECT FOR ADJACENT STRUCTURES IN THE TIME-FREQUENCY DOMAIN. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 195–206. https://ajindex.com/articles/664393

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Anagnostopoulos SA. Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1988; 16: 443-456
  2. Davis RO. Pounding of buildings modelled by an impact oscillator. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992; 21: 253–274
  3. Maison B, Kasai K. Dynamics of pounding when two building collide. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992; 21: 771-786
  4. Filiatrault A, Wagner P, Cherry S. Analytical prediction of experimental building pounding. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1995; 24: 1131–1154
  5. Papadrakakis M, Mouzakis H. Earthquake simulator testing of pounding between adjacent buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1995; 24: 811–834
  6. Papadrakakis M, Apostolopoulou C, Zacharopoulos A, Bitzarakis S. Three-dimensional simulation of structural pounding during earthquakes. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1996; 122: 423–431
  7. Stavroulakis GE, Abdalla KM. Contact between adjacent structures. Journal of Structural Engineering 1991; 117: 2838–2850
  8. Filiatrault A, Cervantes M. Separation between buildings to avoid pounding during earthquakes. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 1995; 22: 164–179
  9. Lin JH. Separation distance to avoid seismic pounding of adjacent buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1997; 26: 395–403
  10. Jeng V, Kasai K. Spectral relative motion of two structures due to seismic travel waves. Journal of Structural Engineering 1996; 122: 1128–1135
  11. Hao H, Zhang SR. Spatial ground motion effect on relative displacement of adjacent building structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28: 333–349
  12. Pantelides CP, Ma X. Linear and non-linear pounding of structural systems. Computers and Structures 1998; 66: 79–92
  13. Chau KT, Wei XX. Pounding of structures modelled as non-linear impacts of two oscillators. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 30: 633–651
  14. Rahman AM, Carr AJ, Moss PJ. Seismic pounding of a case of adjacent multiplestorey buildings of differing total heights considering soil flexibility effects. Bull NZ Soc Earthquake Eng 2001; 34: 140–159
  15. Muthukumar S. A contact element approach with hysteresis damping for the analysis and design of pounding in bridges. In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy in civil and environmental engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia, 2003
  16. Gong L, Hao H. A