SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

The Effects of International and Industrial Diversification on Firm Value: Evidence from Turkey

Uluslararası ve Endüstriyel Çeşitlendirmenin Firma Değeri Üzerindeki Etkileri: Türkiye Örneği

Semra BANK
Hüseyin ÜNAL
Yusuf GÜNEYSU
Pages
519–534
Publication Date
2022-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Acquired diversification premiums were also observed to continue in case of control of institutional investors’ share ownership; in addition, a positive relation was found between institutional investors’ share ownership and firm value at low share ownership, while it is negative in high ownership rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study determined that international diversification does not have significant effect on the value of the firms operating in manufacturing sector among the firms listed in the Borsa Istanbul Equity Market; however, that the industrial diversification increases the firm value by using the “Excess Value Methodology” developed by Berger and Ofek (1995) and modified by Fauver et al (2004).
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study determined that international diversification does not have significant effect on the value of the firms operating in manufacturing sector among the firms listed in the Borsa Istanbul Equity Market; however, that the industrial diversification increases the firm value by using the “Excess Value Methodology” developed by Berger and Ofek (1995) and modified by Fauver et al (2004).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Acquired diversification premiums were also observed to continue in case of control of institutional investors’ share ownership; in addition, a positive relation was found between institutional investors’ share ownership and firm value at low share ownership, while it is negative in high ownership rates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Uluslararası Çeşitlendirme · Endüstriyel Çeşitlendirme · Firma Değeri

Abstract

This study determined that international diversification does not have significant effect on the value of the firms operating in manufacturing sector among the firms listed in the Borsa Istanbul Equity Market; however, that the industrial diversification increases the firm value by using the “Excess Value Methodology” developed by Berger and Ofek (1995) and modified by Fauver et al (2004). Acquired diversification premiums were also observed to continue in case of control of institutional investors’ share ownership; in addition, a positive relation was found between institutional investors’ share ownership and firm value at low share ownership, while it is negative in high ownership rates.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Berger ve Ofek (1995) tarafından geliştirilen ve Fauver vd. (2004) tarafından modifiye edilen “Artık Değer Metodolojisi”ni kullanarak, Borsa İstanbul Pay Piyasası’nda işlem gören firmalardan İmalat Sektöründe yer alan firmalar için uluslararası çeşitlendirmenin firma değeri üzerinde herhangi bir anlamlı etkiye sahip olmadığını bununla birlikte endüstriyel çeşitlendirmenin firma değerlerini artırdığını tespit etmiştir. Elde edilen çeşitlendirme priminin, firmaların kurumsal yatırımcılarının sahiplik yapısı paylarının kontrol edilmesi durumunda da devam ettiği gözlenmiş; bununla birlikte, kurumsal yatırımcıların firma değeri ile düşük sahiplik oranlarında pozitif, yüksek sahiplik oranlarında ise negatif ilişkili olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BANK, S., ÜNAL, H., GÜNEYSU, Y. (2022). The Effects of International and Industrial Diversification on Firm Value: Evidence from Turkey. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 519–534. https://ajindex.com/articles/664292

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Al‐Maskati, N.; Bate, A.J.; Bhabra, G.S. (2015), “Diversification, corporate governance and firm value in small markets: evidence from New Zealand”, Accounting & Finance, Vol. 55, No. 3: 627-657.
  2. Amihud, Y.; Lev, B. (1981), “Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers”, The Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 12, No. 2: 605-617.
  3. Attig, N.; Cleary, S.; El Ghoul, S.; Guedhami, O. (2012), “Institutional investment horizon and investment–cash flow sensitivity”, Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 36, No. 4: 1164–1180.
  4. Baltagi, B.H.; Jung, B.C.; Song, S.H. (2010), “Testing for heteroskedasticity and serial correlation in a random effects panel data model”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 154, No. 2: 122-124.
  5. Berger, P.G.; Ofek. E. (1995), “Diversification’s effect on firm value”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 37, No. 1: 39-65.
  6. Bodnar, G.M.; Tang, C.; Weintrop, J. (1997), “Both sides of corporate diversification: The value impacts of geographic and industrial diversification”, NBER Working Paper No. 6224, Cambridge, October. Borah, N.; Pan, L.; Park, J.C.; Shao, N. (2018), “Does corporate diversification reduce value in high technology firms?”, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol. 51, No. 3: 683-718.
  7. Brewer, H.L. (1981), “Investor benefits from corporate international diversification”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 16, No. 1: 113-126.
  8. Caves, R. E. (1971), “International corporations: The industrial economics of foreign investment”, Economica, Vol. 38, No. 149: 1-27.
  9. Chen, C.-J.; Yu, C.-M.J. (2012), “Managerial ownership, diversification, and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market”, International Business Review, Vol. 21, No. 3: 518–534.
  10. Chen, S.-S.; Ho, K. W. (2000), “Corporate diversification, ownership structure, and firm value The Singapore evidence”, International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 9, No. 3: 315-326.
  11. Cho, K.R. (2017), “The impacts of international diversification, product diversification, and organizational learning capability on firm value: evidence from Korean firms”, Journal of Contemporary Management, Vol. 6, No.1: 39-50.
  12. Choe, C.; Dey, T.; Mishra. V. (2014), “Corporate diversification, executive compensation and firm value: Evidence from Australia”, Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 39, No. 3: 395-414.
  13. Claessens, S.; Djankov, S.; Fan, J.; Lang, L. (2001), “The pattern and valuation effects of corporate diversification: A comparison of the United States, Japan, and