Journals / Güvenlik Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

Obtaining The Optimal State of National Security

Ulusal Güvenliğin Optimal Devletini Sağlamak

Pages
189–198
Publication Date
2018-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the desired “optimal state,” for the US, the global risk to American national security must be minimized

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper uniquely gives insights into what an American Statesman should consider in the fields of international influence, economic warfare, and other measures to assert its unipolar power in the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It does not reflect the author’s opinion on how he would handle crises; instead, gives the academic insight on the task of the American Statesman, which is to manufacture a balance of fear amongst the world’s powers as part of the maintenance of an orderly international system - a system that, while not necessarily just or fair, is accepted by the game’s dominant players as legitimate and recognizes the United States as the game-master.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the desired “optimal state,” for the US, the global risk to American national security must be minimized
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Taktiksel Ekonomik Savaş · Dış Politika · Kalitatif Oyun Teorisi

Abstract

This paper uniquely gives insights into what an American Statesman should consider in the fields of international influence, economic warfare, and other measures to assert its unipolar power in the world. It does not reflect the author’s opinion on how he would handle crises; instead, gives the academic insight on the task of the American Statesman, which is to manufacture a balance of fear amongst the world’s powers as part of the maintenance of an orderly international system - a system that, while not necessarily just or fair, is accepted by the game’s dominant players as legitimate and recognizes the United States as the game-master. This mindset is not only sui generis to an American statesman, but also utilized by any statesman concerning its country’s ambitions. In the desired “optimal state,” for the US, the global risk to American national security must be minimized

Özet

Bu makale, Amerikan Devlet Memurunun uluslararası etki, ekonomik savaş ve dünyadaki tek kutuplu gücünü ileri sürmeye yönelik diğer tedbir alanlarında düşünmesi gerekenleri ortaya koyuyor. Kişisel olarak krizleri nasıl ele alacağı konusu yazarın görüşünü yansıtmıyor; aksine, düzenli bir uluslararası sistemin sürdürülmesinin parçası olarak dünya güçleri arasında bir korku dengesi üretmekte olan Amerikalı Devlet adamının görevi üzerine akademik bilgilere yer veriyor - adil ya da adil olmaksızın kabul edilen bir sistem oyunun büyük oyuncuları tarafından meşru kabul edilir ve ABD’yi oyun yöneticisi olarak tanır. Bu zihniyet sadece bir Amerika devlet adamına mahsus değil; aynı zamanda ülkenin hırslarına göre herhangi bir devlet adamı tarafından da kullanılmaktadır. ABD için arzulanan “optimal devlet” Amerikan ulusal güvenliği için ona karşı küresel riski en aza indirgemelidir

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, M. L. (2018). Obtaining The Optimal State of National Security. Güvenlik Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 189–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/66185

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Baev, Pavel, K., (2016). “Russia Is Not Strong. And Putin is Even Weaker”, Brooking Institution, 8th of June 2015, https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-cha- os/2015/06/08/russia-is-not-strong-and-putin-is-even-weaker/ (E.D: 10th of December 2018).
  2. Barone, Marco Giulio, (2014), “The Missing Doctrine of Economic Warfare”, The Cen- ter of Security Studies, 12th of January 2015, https://isnblog.ethz.ch/security/the-mis- sing-doctrine-of-economic-warfare (E.D: 11th of December 2018).
  3. Bowler, Tim, (2015), “Falling Oil Prices: Who are The Winners and Losers?”, BBC, 19th of January 2015, https://www.bbc.com/news/business-29643612 (E.D: 7th of Novem- ber 2018).
  4. Ellyatt, Holly, (2016), “Russia Expacted to Return to Growth in 2017: IMF”, CNBC, 14th of July 2016, https://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/13/russia-expected-to-return-to-growth- in-2017-imf.html (E.D: 9th of May 2018). FOCUS ECONOMICS, (2016), Russia Retail Sales - Russia Economy Forecast & Out- look, https://www.focus-economics.com/country-indicator/russia/retail-sales (E.D: 7th of December 2018).
  5. Hobson, Peter, (2015), “Calculating the Cost of Russia’s War in Syria”, The Moscow Ti- mes, 20th of October 2015, https://themoscowtimes.com/articles/calculating-the-cost- of-russias-war-in-syria-50382 (E.D: 15th of November 2018).
  6. Kendall-Taylor, Andrea; Frantz, Erica and Wright, Joseph, (2016), “The New Dicta- tors”, Foreign Affairs, 26th of September 2016, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/artic- les/2016-09-26/new-dictators (E.D: 5th of December 2018).
  7. Kissinger, Henry. A., (1957), “Metternich, Klemens and Wenzel Nepomuk Lothar Fürst von.”, A World Restored, Boston: Mifflin. Kissinger, Henry, A., (2014),
  8. World Order, New York City, NY: Penguin Press.
  9. Magstadt, Thomas, M. (2016),
  10. Understanding Politics Ideas, Institutions, and Issues, USA: Wadsworth Pub. Milliyet, (2017), “Fırat Kalkanı Harekatının 216 Günlük Bilançosu”, 30th of March 2017, http://www.milliyet.com.tr/firat-kalkani-harekatinin-216-gundem-2423279/ (E.D: 11th of December 2018). Norton, (2016), “Stuxnet Worm – Malware Virus Attack”, https://us.norton.com/stuxnet (E.D: 27th of June 2018).
  11. Pomerantsev, Peter, (2014), “How Putin Is Reinventing Warfare”, Foreign Policy, 5th of May 2014, https://foreignpolicy.com/2014/05/05/how-putin-is-reinventing-warfare/ (E.D: 10th of March 2018). Science Daily, “National Security”, https://www.sciencedaily.com/terms/national_secu- rity.htm (E.D: 13th of December 2018).
  12. Slav, Irina, (2016), “Russia Sends Mix Signals To Oi