Journals / Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: PSYCHOEDUCATION

KANITA DAYALI UYGULAMA: PSIKOEĞITIM

Pages
66–74
Publication Date
2011-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, there is a need to determine the standards regarding the number and frequency of psychoeducational intervention sessions conducted in different groups, by whom the interventions should be performed and what qualifications the persons to carry out interventions should have

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the study, the definition, usage and effectiveness of psychoeducation is investigated in the light of the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Psychoeducation, one of the evidence-based interventions, is today widely employed in many areas regarding patients/healthy individuals and/or families as one of the several dimensions of psychosocial interventions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, there is a need to determine the standards regarding the number and frequency of psychoeducational intervention sessions conducted in different groups, by whom the interventions should be performed and what qualifications the persons to carry out interventions should have
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Psikoeğitim · Kanıta Dayalı Uygulama · Psikososyal Müdahale

Abstract

In the study, the definition, usage and effectiveness of psychoeducation is investigated in the light of the literature. Psychoeducation, one of the evidence-based interventions, is today widely employed in many areas regarding patients/healthy individuals and/or families as one of the several dimensions of psychosocial interventions. Psychoeducation focuses on methods used to improve coping skills of patients/healthy individuals and families, and aims at helping patients and families manage the disease. In the literature, there are several studies in some of which psychoeducation intervention is used alone and in others of which psychoeducation is employed together with other treatment approaches during protection, treatment and rehabilitation stages. However, there is a need to determine the standards regarding the number and frequency of psychoeducational intervention sessions conducted in different groups, by whom the interventions should be performed and what qualifications the persons to carry out interventions should have

Özet

Bu çalışmada psikoeğitimin tanımı, kullanım alanları ve etkinliği, ilgili literatür doğrultusunda incelenmiştir. Kanıta dayalı uygulamalar arasında yer alan psikoeğitim, günümüzde psikososyal müdahale boyutlarından biri olarak hasta/sağlıklı birey ve aileye yönelik pek çok alanda uygulanmaktadır. Psikoeğitimde hasta/sağlıklı birey ve ailesinin baş etme becerilerini geliştirme yöntemlerine odaklanılmakta ve hastalığı yönetmede hastayı ve aileyi güçlendirme hedeflenmektedir. Literatürde koruma, tedavi ve rehabilitasyon düzeylerinde tek başına psikoeğitim müdahalesi ya da diğer tedavi yaklaşımlarıyla bir arada uygulandığı çalışmalar bulunmaktadır. Çalışmalarda psikoeğitimsel müdahalelerin bakım ve hasta sonuçları üzerine etkili olduğuna dikkat çekilmektedir. Ancak çalışmalar incelendiğinde psikoeğitim müdahalerinin farklı gruplarda oturum sayı ve sıklığının, müdahalelerin kimler tarafından yürütülebileceğinin, müdahaleleri yürütecek kişilerin taşıması gereken yeterlilikler gibi konu alanlarında standartların belirlenmesine gereksinim olduğu görülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENGÜN, F., ÜSTÜN, B., ALTIOK, H. Ö. (2011). EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: PSYCHOEDUCATION. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 66–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/661681

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Alataş G, Kurt E, Alataş ET ve ark. (2007). Duygudurum bozukluklarında psikoeğitim. Düşünen Adam, 20(4): 196-205.
  2. Aydın KB (2006).
  3. Stresle Başa Çıkma, Öner U(ed). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
  4. Aydın KB (2005). Akış kuramına dayalı stresle başa çıkma grup programının ergenlerin stresle başa çıkma stratejilerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Baker JA (2000). Developing psychosocial care for acute psychiatric wards. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 7 (2): 95-100.
  5. Barsevick AM, Sweeney C, Haney E et al. (2002). A systematic qualitative analysis of psychoeducational interventions for Depression in patients with Cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 29 (1): 73-84.
  6. Bercaw GN (2000). Advocacy training: A look toward the future for pediatric cancer patients and their families. Dissertation Abstracts International: B. Sciences & Engineering, 60: (9-B). Blair TD, Raınones VA (1997). Education as psychiatric intervention: the cognitive-behavioral context. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 35 (12):29-36.
  7. Boyd M, Nihard, M (1998).
  8. Psychiatric Nursing, Lippincott Company p: 313-314.
  9. Brotto LA (2008). Psychoeducational intervention for sexual dysfunction in women with gynecologic cancer. Arch Sex Behav, 37(2): 317-329.
  10. Bultz BD, Speca M, Brasher PM et al. (2000). A randomized controlled trial of a brief psychoeducational support for partners of early stage breast cancer patients. Psychooncology, 9 (4): 303-313.
  11. Cash TF, Hrabosky JI (2003). The Effects of psychoeducation and self- monitoring in a cognitive behavioral program for body-image improvement. Eating Disorders, 11(4): 255–270.
  12. Ciliska, D (1998). Evaluation of two nondieting interventions for obese women. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 20 (1): 119–135.
  13. Chan CWH (2005). Psychoeducational intervention: A critical review of systematic analyses. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing, 9 (3-4): 101–111.
  14. Cunningham AJ (2000). Adjuvant psychological therapy for cancer patients: Putting it on the same footing as adjunctive medical therapies. Psychooncology, 9 (5): 367–371.
  15. Cunningham AJ, Edmonds CV, Williams D (1999). Delivering a very brief psychoeducational program to cancer patients and family members in a large group format. Psychooncology, 8 (2): 177 182. Colom F, Vieta E, Martinez-Aran A et al. (2003). A randomized trial on the efficacy of group psychoeducation in the prophylaxis of recurrences in bipolar patients whose