Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle in Turkey

TÜRKİYE’DE FELDSTEIN-HORIOKA SORUNSALI

Pages
45–63
Publication Date
2014-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Then, with Gregory-Hansen and Hatemi-J models, it was found that the saving-retention coefficient got a value close to 1 and 0.426 respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, Feldstein-Horioka hypothesis on saving-investment relationship was tested for the period 1968-2008 in Turkey using Hansen-Seo, Gregory-Hansen and Hatemi-J models.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Then, with Gregory-Hansen and Hatemi-J models, it was found that the saving-retention coefficient got a value close to 1 and 0.426 respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results obtained show that in testing Feldstein-Horioka hypothesis, instead of a fixed parameter assumption, applying test techniques that take endogenous structural breaks into consideration would give more reliable results.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Feldstein-Horioka Sorunsalı · Eşik Eşbütünleşme · GregoryHansen

Abstract

In this study, Feldstein-Horioka hypothesis on saving-investment relationship was tested for the period 1968-2008 in Turkey using Hansen-Seo, Gregory-Hansen and Hatemi-J models. First of all, when Feldstein-Horioka hypothesis was researched by Hansen-Seo method, the variables did not exhibit a nonlinear structure. Then, with Gregory-Hansen and Hatemi-J models, it was found that the saving-retention coefficient got a value close to 1 and 0.426 respectively. It was understood that the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle continued. The results obtained show that in testing Feldstein-Horioka hypothesis, instead of a fixed parameter assumption, applying test techniques that take endogenous structural breaks into consideration would give more reliable results.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Hansen-Seo, Gregory-Hansen ve Hatemi-J modelleri kullanılarak Türkiye’de Feldstein-Horioka hipotezi 1968-2008 dönemi için test edilmiştir. Öncelikle Feldstein-Horioka hipotezi Hansen-Seo yöntemiyle araştırılmış, değişkenlerin uzun dönemde doğrusal olmayan bir yapı izlemediği bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Daha sonra Gregory-Hansen ve Hatemi-J modelleri çerçevesinde tasarruf tutma katsayısı sırasıyla 1’e yakın ve 0.426 olarak elde edilmiş FeldsteinHorioka sorunsalının devam ettiği gözlenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar F-H hipotezinin test edilmesinde sabit bir parametre varsayımı yerine endojen yapısal kırılmaları dikkate alan test tekniklerinin uygulanmasının daha güvenilir sonuçlar verebileceğini göstermiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

DURSUN, G., ABASIZ, T. (2014). Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle in Turkey. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 45–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/658431

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. ADEDEJI, O., THORNTON, J. (2008). International capital mobility: evidence from panel cointegration tests. Economic Letters, 99 (2), 349-352. pp. ALEXAKIS, P., APERGIS, N. (1994). The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle and exchange rate regimes: evidence from cointegration Tests. Journal of Policy Modeling, 16 (5), 459-472. pp. ANDRADE, J. S. (2008). European integration and external sustainability of the European Union: an application of the thesis of Feldstein and Horioka. Transition Studies Review, 15, 21-36. pp. ANDREWS, D. W. K. (1993). Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica, 61 (4), 821-856. pp. ANDREWS, D. W. K., PLOBERGER, W. (1994). Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica, 62 (6), 1383-1414. pp. APERGIS, N., TSOULFIDIS, L. (1997). The relationship between saving and finance: theory and evidence from EU countries. Research in Economics, 51 (4), 333-358. pp. BAI, J., PERRON, P. (2003). Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18, 1-22. pp. BAJO-RUBIO, O. (1998). The saving-investment correlation revisted: the case of Spain, 1964-1994. Applied Economics Letters, 5, 769-772. pp. BALKE, N., FOMBY, T. (1997). Threshold cointegration. International Economic Review, 38, 627-645. pp. BAXTER, M., CRUCINI, M.J. (1993). Explaining saving-investment correlations. American EconomicReview, 83, 416-436. pp. BAYOUMI, T. (1990). Saving-investment correlations: immobile capital, government policy, or endogenous behaviour? IMF Staff Papers, 37, 360-387. pp. BORATAV, K. (2001). 2000-2001 krizinde sermaye hareketleri [capital movements during The Crisis: 2000/2001]. İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 16 (186), 7-17. pp. CAPORALE, G.M., PANOPOULOU, E., PITTIS, N. (2005). The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle revisted: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of International Money and Finance, 24, 1143- 1149. pp. CHAN, T., BAHARUNSHAH, A.Z. (2007). Measuring capital mobility in the Asia Pacific Rim (MIPRA Paper No. 2208). Retrieved 2012, May 01, from http://mpra.ub.uni- muenchen.de/2208/ COAKLEY, J., KULASI, F., SMITH, R. (1996). Current account solvency and the Feldstein- Horioka puzzle. The Economic Journal, 106(436), 620-627. pp. COITEUX, M., OLIVER, S. (2000). The saving retention coefficient in the long run and in the short run: evidence from panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 19, 535-548. pp. DAVIES, R.B. (1977). Hypothesi