SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dil Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 173 - Sayı: 2

A NEW RESTRICTION ON ADJECTIVE ORDERING

SIFAT SIRALAMALARI ÜZERİNDE YENİ BİR KISITLAMA

İsa Kerem BAYIRLI
Pages
43–67
Publication Date
2022-07-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The paper comes to an end with a brief discussion of a syntactic aprroach to the Final-over-Final constraint.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, a new restriction on adjective ordering is proposed and it is shown that this restriction can be explained by the Final-over-Final Constraint.
📊
Key Findings & Data:First, the Final-over-Final Constraint is described with examples exhibiting its explanatory power.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The paper comes to an end with a brief discussion of a syntactic aprroach to the Final-over-Final constraint.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sıfatların dizimi · Sıfat Hiyerarşisi · Son-üstü-son Kısıtı

Abstract

In this paper, a new restriction on adjective ordering is proposed and it is shown that this restriction can be explained by the Final-over-Final Constraint. First, the Final-over-Final Constraint is described with examples exhibiting its explanatory power. Later, various observations about adjectives are made and two analyses for adjectival syntax are presented: (a) adjunction analysis and (b) functional head analysis. Furthermore, it is suggested that adjectives obey a word-order restriction to be dubbed the Adjective Ordering Generalization. In the last section, it is shown that the Adjective Ordering Generalization can be explained by the Final-over-Final Constraint if we assume that adjectives are introduced via functional heads. The paper comes to an end with a brief discussion of a syntactic aprroach to the Final-over-Final constraint.

Özet

Bu yazıda sıfat sıralamaları ile ilgili yeni bir genelleme ortaya atılmakta ve bu genellemenin Son-üstü-Son Kısıtı tarafından açıklanabileği gösterilmektedir. Yazıda ilk olarak Son-üstü-Son Kısıtı betimlenmekte ve bu kısıtın açıklayıcı gücüne örnekler verilmektedir. Daha sonra sıfatlar ile ilgili bazı gözlemler ışığında sıfatların dizimi ile ilgili iki analiz sunulmaktadır: (a) bitiştirme analizi ve (b) işlevsel baş analizi. Yazının sonraki bölümünde sıfat sıralamaları üzerinde adına Sıfat Sırası Genellemesi denilen bir kısıtlamanın var olduğu savunulmaktadır. Son olarak sıfatların işlevsel baş analizi varsayıldığında Sıfat Sırası Genellemesinin Son-üstü-Son Kısıtının sonuçlarından biri olarak ele alınabileceği gösterilmektedir. Yazı, Son-üstü-Son Kısıtının neden geçerli olduğunu açıklayan dizim-temelli bir analizin betimlenmesiyle sona ermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYIRLI, İ. K. (2022). A NEW RESTRICTION ON ADJECTIVE ORDERING. Dil Dergisi, Cilt: 173 - Sayı: 2, 43–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/657028

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alexiadou, A, Haegeman, L & Stavrou, M. (2007). Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Artiagoitia, X. (2006). Basque adjectives and the functional structure of the noun phrase. Basılmamış Eser. University of the Basque Country Bernstein, J. (1993) Topics in the syntax of nominal structure across Romance (doktora tezi). CUNY Biberauer, T, & Sheehan, M. (2013). Theoretical approaches to disharmonic word order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A. & Roberts, I. (2014). A syntactic universal and its consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 45(2), 169-225
  3. Biloa, E. (2013). The Syntax of Tuki: A Cartographic Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Cinque, G. (1994). On the evidence for partial N movement in the Romance DP. G. Cinque, J. Koster, J.-Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi & R. Zanuttini, (Yay), Paths Towards Universal Grammar. Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne (ss. 85-110).Georgetown University Press:
  4. Washington D.C. Cinque, G. (2010). The syntax of adjectives: A comparative study. MIT Press Dixon, R.M.W. (1982). Where have all the adjectives gone? New York: Mouton Hawkins, John. (1983). Word Order Universals. New York: Academic Press.
  5. Holmberg, A. (2000). Deriving OV Order in Finnish. P. Svenonius (Yay.) The Derivation of VO and OV (ss. 123-152). Oxford/New York: OUP. Kayne, R. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press.
  6. Laenzinger, C. (2005). French adjective ordering: perspectives on DP-internal movement types. Lingua, 115(5), 645-689.
  7. Rizzi, L. (1997). The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. L. Haegeman (Yay), Elements of Grammar (ss. 281-337)
  8. Kluwer Amsterdam. Scott, G.J. (2002). Stacked adjectival modification and the structure of nominal phrases. G. Cinque (Yay.) Functional Structure in DP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. (ss. 91–120) Oxford University Press:
  9. New York. Sheehan, M. (2009). The Final-over-Final Constraint as an effect of Complement Stranding. Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 104-125.
  10. Sheehan, M. (2013). Some implications of a Copy Theory of Labelling for the LCA. Syntax 16: 362-396
  11. Sheehan, M. (2017). The Final-over-Final Condition and the Head-Final Filter. M. Sheehan, T. Biberauer, I. Roberts and A. Holmberg (Yay.) The Final-over-Final Condition. (ss. 121 – 150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  12. Shlonsky, U. (2004). The form of Semitic noun phrases. Lingua 114(12). 1465 – 1526. Sproat, R. ve Shih, C. (1991). The cross-linguistic distribution of adjective ordering restric