SavedAdd your journal

Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Restrictions interface proposal for the selection of sustainable stormwater management tools

Nazife Tuğçe ONUK MADANOĞLU
Meltem ERDEM KAYA
Pages
335–351
Publication Date
2022-11-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since the proposed interface promotes the integration of SWM into design decision making process in undeveloped countries and can be used as an education tool, it is expected to have a widespread impact.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In leading countries, alternative stormwater management (SWM) approaches guide design process with local guides, databases and user interfaces which are mostly land depended by their priorities and targets.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study presents a proposed interface for the selection of SWM tools according to site restrictions, hydrological functions, land use and performances based on location independent data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since the proposed interface promotes the integration of SWM into design decision making process in undeveloped countries and can be used as an education tool, it is expected to have a widespread impact.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In leading countries, alternative stormwater management (SWM) approaches guide design process with local guides, databases and user interfaces which are mostly land depended by their priorities and targets. Their adoption as a reference is challenging for designers in countries where sustainable stormwater infrastructure is undeveloped. This study presents a proposed interface for the selection of SWM tools according to site restrictions, hydrological functions, land use and performances based on location independent data. SWM approaches, local guides and web-based resources are reviewed to form a dataset for common 26 SWM tools and their land-independent features to create a MS Office-based algorithm for designing an interface to help the user to define the suitable tool for the site. Interface is demonstrated as a design tool to create a water quality performance based storm-water treatment chain in ITU Ayazaga Campus. As a result, appropriate SWM tools are succesfully selected to convey runoff water from parking lots to storm-water pond considering the land use changes. And SWM tools were gathered from interface were suitable to create a chain. Also using the interface was time saving with no need for additional research on tools. Since the proposed interface promotes the integration of SWM into design decision making process in undeveloped countries and can be used as an education tool, it is expected to have a widespread impact.

🔖

Cite This Article

MADANOĞLU, N. T. O., KAYA, M. E. (2022). Restrictions interface proposal for the selection of sustainable stormwater management tools. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 335–351. https://ajindex.com/articles/655747

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ahn, J. H., Grant, S. B., Surbeck, C. Q., DiGiacomo, P. M., Nezlin, N. P., & Jiang, S. (2005). Coastal water quality impact of stormwater runoff from an urban watershed in southern California. Environmental science & technology, 39(16), 5940-5953.
  2. Asadian, Y., & Weiler, M. (2009). A new approach in measuring rainfall interception by urban trees in coastal British Columbia. Water Quality Research Journal, 44(1), 16-25
  3. Ashley, R. M., Balmforth, D. J., Saul, A. J., & Blanskby, J. D. (2005). Flooding in the future–predicting climate change, risks and responses in urban areas. Water Science and Technology, 52(5), 265-273.IWA Publishing. Ballard, W. B., Kellagher, R., Martin, P., Jefferies, C., Bray, R., & Shaffer, P. (2007). The SUDS manual (C697). London: CIRIA Ballard, W. B., Wilson, S., Udale- Clarke, H., Illman, S., Scott, T., Ashley, R., & Kellagher, R. (2015). The SUDS manual (C753). London: CIRIA Beach, D. (2003). Coastal sprawl: The effects of urban design on aquatic ecosystems in the United States, Pew Oceans Commission 2002.
  4. BMT WBM Pty Ltd. (2009). Evaluating options for water sensitive urban design – A national guide. Joint Steering Committee For Water Sensitive Cities (JSCWSC) Bray, B., Gedge, D., Grant, G., Leuthvilay, L., (2012).
  5. Rain Garden Guide, Retrieved from https://raingardens. info/. Retrieved 05.06.2020 British Plastics Federation Group, (2018). Guide to designing geocellular drainage systems to CIRIA report C737. Retrieved from https://www. bpfpipesgroup.com/media/29721/ Guide-to-designing-geocellular-drainage- systems-to-CIRIA-Report-C737. pdf. Retreved January 3, 2020.
  6. Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Maghelal, P., Grover, H., & Highfield, W. E. (2007). The rising costs of floods: Examining the impact of planning and development decisions on property damage in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(3), 330-345.
  7. Bureau of Watershed Management. (2006). Pennsylvania stormwater best management practices manual.(Document No. 363-0300-002). Department Of Environmental Protection Center For Watershed Protection, Maryland Department of the Environment Water Management Administration. (2000).
  8. Maryland stormwater design manual, Vol. I. & II. Maryland. https://mde.maryland.gov/programs/ water/stormwatermanagementprogram/ pages/stormwater_design.aspx Center for Watershed Protection. (2003). NewYork State stormwater management design manual. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. New York State. Center for Watershed P