Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Creating spaces for art: Long term impacts of street art in the urban context

Pages
459–470
Publication Date
2022-11-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings of this study reveal that street art holds the potential of contributing to the city life through creating spaces for artistic activities and moreover of changing the meaning and identity of the public spaces and the settlements.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Street art can be defined as any informal artistic performances or artworks practiced in the public spaces.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, the article overviews the concept of street art and demonstrates its positive, negative and temporal impacts on public space.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings of this study reveal that street art holds the potential of contributing to the city life through creating spaces for artistic activities and moreover of changing the meaning and identity of the public spaces and the settlements.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Street art can be defined as any informal artistic performances or artworks practiced in the public spaces. Street art has the potential to transform the public spaces by contributing to or reducing the quality of these spaces. Through street art, in many cases, public spaces are transformed into places for entertainment, cultural activities, or areas of protests and expression of the feelings and ideas. The impacts of street art practices might be limited to one part of an open space or spread to a district or even to the entire city depending on its temporal dimension. This article aims to examine the relationship of street art and public space. In this context, the article overviews the concept of street art and demonstrates its positive, negative and temporal impacts on public space. This study uses a case study approach and evaluates the long term impacts of street art practices based on the analysis of three cases in the city of İzmir, Turkey. In İzmir cases it is found out that the street art practices transformed the public space in terms of uses, activities and built environment quality and had impacts on economic and social structure of the community. The findings of this study reveal that street art holds the potential of contributing to the city life through creating spaces for artistic activities and moreover of changing the meaning and identity of the public spaces and the settlements.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOLÇAK, E., EROL, N. K. (2022). Creating spaces for art: Long term impacts of street art in the urban context. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 459–470. https://ajindex.com/articles/655754

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Aksoy, C. (2020). Cofounder of the Darağaç Collective. Personal Communication [Personal Interview]. Ateşçier, H. (2020). Artisan in Umurbey Neighbourhood. Personal Communication [Personal Interview]. Blanché, U. (2015). Street Art and related terms-discussion and working definition. Street Art & Urban Creativity Scientific Journal, 1(1), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.25765/sauc.v1i1.14 Cambridge Dictionary. (n.d.), retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge. org/dictionary/english/shortterm Cansız, O., S. (2012). Sokak Sanatinin Kent Kimliği Üzerine Etkileri. [M.S. thesis, Ege University]. https:// acikerisim.ege.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/ 11454/6366 Ceccato, V. & Wilhelmsson, M. (2012). Acts of Vandalism and Fear in Neighbourhoods: Do They Affect Housing Prices?. Ceccato, V. (Ed.), The Urban Fabric of Crime and Fear. (pp.191-213)
  2. Springer, Netherlands. Cluzeau, C., O. (2017). Tourism and contemporary arts: a particular case in Cultural Tourism. Methaodos. revista De Ciencias Sociales, 5 (1), 21- 37. http://dx.doi.org/10.17502/m.rcs. v5i1.153 Conklin, R., T. (2012).
  3. Street Art, Ideology, and Public Space. [M.S. thesis, Portland State University]. Doi: 10.15760/etd.761 Cox, C., & Guaralda, M. (2016). Public Space for Street-Scape Theatrics. Guerrilla Spatial Tactics and Methods of Urban Hacking in Brisbane, Australia. The Journal of Public Space, 1(1), 113-128. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.5204/jps.v1i1.23 Dionísio, A. & Ribeiro, T. (2013). When graffiti is not art: the damage of alkyd sprays on calcareous stones employed in Cultural Heritage. In Frediani, P., Frediani, M. and Rosi, L. (Eds.) Cultural Heritage: Protection, Developments and International Perspectives (279-291).
  4. Nova Science Publishers.
  5. Doumpa, V. & Broad, N. (2014). Buskers As An Ingredient Of Successful Urban Places. Futures of Places. http:// futureofplaces.com/media_resource /583/ Emlakgazete. (2010). İzmir Çeşme Germiyan Satılık Villa. Erden, N. ( 2020). Mural Artist. Resident of Germiyan Village. Personal Communication [Personal Interview]. Forte, F. & Paola, P., D. (2019). How Can Street Art Have Economic Value?. Sustainability. DOI: 10.3390/ su11030580 accessed https://www. mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/580 Fun, S., C. (2014). Street Art Sparkles as a New Economic Driver in Penang. In, 1st International Conference on Creative Media, Design & Technology, REKA 2014,
  6. Penang, MALAYSIA. https://reka.usm.my/images/FULL_ PAPER_002.pdf Geason, S. & Wilson, P., R. (1990). Preventing Graffiti & Vandal