SavedAdd your journal

Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

A model proposal for university campuses in the context of inclusive design

Sahika OZDEMIR
Asli SUNGUR
Pages
301–314
Publication Date
2022-11-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The fieldwork carried out in the Davutpaşa campus was divided into four categories: psycho-social arrangements, administrative arrangements, outdoor and indoor physical arrangements.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Urban public spaces should be shaped according to the need as they occupy an important place in urban development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The campuses serve as a small city due to the facilities and social environment they have and thus emerge as important public spaces.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The fieldwork carried out in the Davutpaşa campus was divided into four categories: psycho-social arrangements, administrative arrangements, outdoor and indoor physical arrangements.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Urban public spaces should be shaped according to the need as they occupy an important place in urban development. The campuses serve as a small city due to the facilities and social environment they have and thus emerge as important public spaces. Campus areas affect our attitudes towards education and should be tailored to the needs and designed to cover all campus users. As a modern design approach, the inclusive design philosophy; To create quality spaces by increasing the livability and quality of university campuses as a public space, and to spread this philosophy to the whole society in their professional lives by ensuring that this design concept is placed on university students, who are the main campus users, who will provide the development of the society. It is to determine the problems faced by the users in the university campuses, research the approaches and examples that will allow all users to access the campus equipment, use this equipment as they wish, and develop solutions for the problems encountered. This study aims to create an evaluation model to create an inclusive campus environment. The creation of the checklist, which was prepared as a priority, as detailed in the field study. The field study continued with the implementation and results of the checklist in the selected Davutpaşa campus. The fieldwork carried out in the Davutpaşa campus was divided into four categories: psycho-social arrangements, administrative arrangements, outdoor and indoor physical arrangements.

🔖

Cite This Article

OZDEMIR, S., SUNGUR, A. (2022). A model proposal for university campuses in the context of inclusive design. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 301–314. https://ajindex.com/articles/655743

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Banning, J.H. (1993). The pedestrian’s visual experience on campus: Informal learning of cultural messages. The Campus Ecologist, 11(1), 1-3.
  2. Boyer, E. L. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. Harper & Row, Publishers,
  3. Inc, New York. Cinar, E. (1998). A Research on University Campus Planning and Design. Master Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul. Erkilic, M. (2012). Inclusive Schools and Urban Space Diversity: Universal Design Strategies in Use. Metu JFA, 29(1), 193-206.
  4. Erkovan, E. (2013). Examination of Akdeniz University Campus as a Public Space within the Scope of Universal Design Principles. Master Thesis, Bahcesehir University, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul. Fredericson, N. and Cline, T. (2009). Special Educational Needs Inclusion and Diversity. Open University Press,
  5. USA. Griffith, J.C. (1994). Open space preservation: An imperative for quality campus environments. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(6), 645-669.
  6. Hick, P., Kershner, R., & Farrel, P.T. (2009). Psychology for Inclusive Education. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, UK. Imrie, R. (2012). Disability and Rehabilitation. Universal Design and Equitable Access to the Built Environment, 34(10), 873-882.
  7. Kortan, E. (1978). University Design. METU Faculty of Architecture Publication, Ankara.
  8. Kugelmass, W.J. (2004). The Inclusive School: Sustaining Equity and Standards. Teachers Collage Press,
  9. UK. Lunt, I. and Norwich, B. (2009). Inclusive and Effective Schools. Psychology for Inclusive Education, Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, UK. Mengi, A. (2019). Engelli Öğrencilerin Üniversite Eğitimi Sürecinde Karşılaştığı Güçlükler: Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Örneği. YYÜ Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16 (1), 147-70.
  10. Nussbaumer, L. (2012). Inclusive Design: A Universal Need. Fairchild Books, New York. Pauya, S. and Kocaaslan H. (2020). Some Suggestions For Barrier-Free Design of Universities Campuses; Example of İnönü University Campus. Recreation and Sports Sciences (ATRSS), 3 (1), 62-85.
  11. Roth, L. (1993). "Commoditie": How Does the Building Function?, Understanding Architecture: Its Elements, History and Meaning. 8-17
  12. Icon Editions, New York. Okten, G. (2018). Evrensel Tasarım İlkeleri Doğrultusunda Engelsiz Üniversite Kampüslerinin Tasarlanması ve Biçimlenmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Enstitüsü, Sanatta Yeterlik Tezi, Ankara.
  13. Steinfeld, E. and Maisel, J.L. (2012). Universal Design