Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 6

Comparison of standard miniplates and locked miniplates in post-traumatic fracture stabilization

Pages
715–722
Publication Date
2022-11-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was statistically compared with the 95% confidence interval using the Pearson coefficient, and p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: Bicortical screws (lag and positional) or miniplates with monocortical screws are generally used for the rigid fixa- tion of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in maxillofacial surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: The aim of this study is to compare the commonly used 2.0 mm standard miniplate/screw systems and 2.0 mm locking miniplate/screw systems in fresh sheep jaws with Obwegeser-Dal Pont (OD) and Hunsuck-Epker (HE) modifications, by evaluating standard parameters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was statistically compared with the 95% confidence interval using the Pearson coefficient, and p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bicortical screws (lag and positional) or miniplates with monocortical screws are generally used for the rigid fixa- tion of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in maxillofacial surgery. However, in this osteosynthesis method, the plate must be perfectly adapted to the bone to prevent misalignment of the bone segment and occlusal changes. In addition, it is necessary to prevent the position of the condyle in the mandibular fossa from changing after fixation. In recent years, locked miniplate systems have been used to overcome these complications. METHODS: The aim of this study is to compare the commonly used 2.0 mm standard miniplate/screw systems and 2.0 mm locking miniplate/screw systems in fresh sheep jaws with Obwegeser-Dal Pont (OD) and Hunsuck-Epker (HE) modifications, by evaluating standard parameters. RESULTS: Our study consists of two main groups and two subgroups. 40 sheep hemimandibulae were randomly divided into two main groups. Each group was randomly divided into two subgroups. There are ten hemimandibulae (n=10) in each subgroup. Linear force test was applied using 4-hole standard miniplate and 4-hole locking miniplate systems on sheep jaws with 5 mm advancement by applying OD and HE techniques, which are two frequently preferred modifications in SSRO. For statistical analysis SPSS® 16.0 (Sta- tistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois, USA) package program was used. It was statistically compared with the 95% confidence interval using the Pearson coefficient, and p

🔖

Cite This Article

Yazar, L., Aydil, B. A., Ayhan, M., Çömlekçioğlu, Y. (2022). Comparison of standard miniplates and locked miniplates in post-traumatic fracture stabilization. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 6, 715–722. https://ajindex.com/articles/655416

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Dal Pont G. Retro-molar osteotomy for correction of prognathism. Min- erva Chir 1959;14:1138–41
  2. Epker B. Modifications in the sagittal osteotomy of the mandible. J Oral Surg 1977;35:157–9
  3. Hunsuck EE. A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technic for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg 1968;26:250–3
  4. Bockmann R, Meyns J, Dik E, Kessler P. The modifications of the sagit- tal ramus split osteotomy: A literature review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014;2:e271
  5. Miloro M, Ghali G, Larsen P, Waite P. Peterson’s Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. United States: PMPH-USA; 2004
  6. Brasileiro BF, Grempel RG, Ambrosano GM, Passeri LA. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus os- teotomies: Advancement surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:809– 17
  7. Sato FR, Asprino L, Consani S, Noritomi PY, de Moraes M. A compara- tive evaluation of the hybrid technique for fixation of the sagittal split ra- mus osteotomy in mandibular advancement by mechanical, photoelastic, and finite element analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;114:S60–8
  8. Erkmen E, Simsek B, Yucel E, Kurt A. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimen- sional finite elements analysis. Part 1: Advancement surgery-posterior loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34:551–8
  9. Ribeiro-Junior PD, Magro-Filho O, Shastri KA, Papageorge MB. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking mini- plate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:724–30
  10. Ellis E, Graham J. Use of a 2.0-mm locking plate/screw system for mandibular fracture surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:642–5
  11. Gutwald R, Alpert B, Schmelzeisen R. Principle and stability of locking plates. Keio J Med 2003;52:21–4
  12. Sauerbier S, Kuenz J, Hauptmann S, Hoogendijk CF, Liebehenschel N, Schon R, et al. Clinical aspects of a 2.0-mm locking plate system for mandibular fracture surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2010;38:501–4
  13. Alpert B, Gutwald R, Schmelzeisen R. New innovations in craniomax- illofacial fixation: The 2.0 lock system. Keio J Med 2003;52:120–7
  14. Vieira Santos ZT, Goulart DR, Sigua-Rodriguez EA, Pozzer L, Olate S, Albergaria-Barbosa JR. Mechanical evaluation of the use of conven- tional and locking miniplate/screw systems used in sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Su