Journals / Türk Yoğun Bakım Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

Preferences and Experiences of Family Members Witnessing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review

Kardiyopulmoner Resüsitasyona Tanık Olan Aile Üyelerinin Tercihleri ve Deneyimleri: Sistematik Derleme

Pages
171–180
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further comparison studies are needed to identify thepositive and negative experiences of family members who witnesss cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This systematic review aimed to examine the preferences and experiences of familymembers who had witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Electronic searches were performed on Cochrane, JBI, Ovid, PubMed, Scopus, and Web ofScience.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We included studies conducted among adult patients and family members that werepublished in peer-reviewed journals in English between 2013-2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further comparison studies are needed to identify thepositive and negative experiences of family members who witnesss cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2013-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to examine the preferences and experiences of familymembers who had witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Electronic searches were performed on Cochrane, JBI, Ovid, PubMed, Scopus, and Web ofScience. We included studies conducted among adult patients and family members that werepublished in peer-reviewed journals in English between 2013-2018. The studies were summarizedby the researchers independently. Then, the summaries were compared, and a consensus wasestablished among the researchers. A total of nine studies were included. Family membersexpressed that they wanted to witness the cardiopulmonary resuscitation and expected to havethat decision respected by healthcare professionals. Although the number of studies were limited,family members who had witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation experienced less anxiety,depression, post-traumatic stress, and grief. Further comparison studies are needed to identify thepositive and negative experiences of family members who witnesss cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Özet

Bu sistematik derlemenin amacı, kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyona tanık olan aile üyelerinin tercihlerini ve deneyimlerini incelemektir. Cochrane, JBI, Ovid, PubMed, Scopus ve Web of Science elektronik veri tabanlarında taramalar yapıldı. Sistematik incelemeye 2013-2018 yılları arasında yetişkin hastalar ve aile üyeleri ile yürütülen ve hakemli dergilerde İngilizce olarak yayınlanan çalışmalar dahil edildi. Kapsama alınan makaleler araştırmacılar tarafından bağımsız olarak özetlendi ve fikir birliği sağlandı. Toplam dokuz çalışma dahil edildi. Aile üyeleri kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyona tanık olmak istemekte ve bu karara sağlık profesyonelleri tarafından saygı gösterilmesini beklemektedirler. Sınırlı sayıda çalışma olmasına rağmen, kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyona tanık olan aile üyelerinin daha az kaygı, depresyon, travma sonrası stres ve keder yaşadığı belirlendi. Kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyona tanık olan aile üyelerinin olumlu ve olumsuz deneyimlerini belirlemek için daha fazla karşılaştırmalı araştırmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAÇAY, P., DOĞU, Ö. (2022). Preferences and Experiences of Family Members Witnessing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review. Türk Yoğun Bakım Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 171–180. https://ajindex.com/articles/655387

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Leske JS, McAndrew NS, Brasel KJ. Experiences of families when present during resuscitation in the emergency department after trauma. J Trauma Nurs 2013;20:77-85
  2. Brasel K, Entwistle J, Sade RM. Should family presence be allowed during cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Ann Thorac Surg 2016;102:1438-43
  3. Powers KA. Barriers to family presence during resuscitation and strategies for improving nurses’ invitation to families. Appl Nurs Res 2017;38:22-8
  4. Millenson ML, Shapiro E, Greenhouse PK, DiGioia III AM. Patient-and familycentered care: a systematic approach to better ethics and care. AMA J Ethics 2016;18:49-55
  5. Oczkowski SJW, Mazzetti I, Cupido C, Fox-Robichaud AE. Family presence during resuscitation: A Canadian Critical Care Society position paper. Can Respir J 2015;22:201-5
  6. Cypress BS, Frederickson K. Family Presence in the Intensive Care Unit and Emergency Department: A Metasynthesis. J Fam Theory Rev 2017;9:201-18
  7. Monsieurs KG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL, Greif R, Maconochie IK, Nikolaou NI, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015 section 1. Executive summary. ResuscitationLimerick, 1972, currens. Resuscitation 2015;95:1-80
  8. Sak-Dankosky N, Andruszkiewicz P, Sherwood PR, Kvist T. Integrative review: nurses’ and physicians’ experiences and attitudes towards inpatient-witnessed resuscitation of an adult patient. J Adv Nurs 2014;70:957-74
  9. Tomlinson KR, Golden IJ, Mallory JL, Comer L. Family presence during adult resuscitation: a survey of emergency department registered nurses and staff attitudes. Adv Emerg Nurs J 2010;32:46- 58
  10. Itzhaki M, Bar‐Tal Y, Barnoy S. Reactions of staff members and lay people to family presence during resuscitation: the effect of visible bleeding, resuscitation outcome and gender. J Adv Nurs 2012;68:1967-77
  11. Powers KA. Educational Interventions to Improve Support for family presence during resuscitation: A Systematic review of the literature. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2017;36:125-38
  12. Johnson C. A literature review examining the barriers to the implementation of family witnessed resuscitation in the Emergency Department. Int Emerg Nurs 2017;30:31-5
  13. Porter JE, Cooper SJ, Sellick K. Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR): Perceived benefits, barriers and enablers to implementation and practice. Int Emerg Nurs 2014;22:69-74
  14. Sak-Dankosky N, Andruszkiewicz P, Sherwood PR, Kvist T. Integrative review: nurses’ and physicians’ experiences and attitudes towards